General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnthem Blue Cross Blue Shield Won't Pay for the Complete Duration of Anesthesia for Patients' Surgical Procedures
https://www.asahq.org/about-asa/newsroom/news-releases/2024/11/anthem-blue-cross-blue-shield-will-not-pay-complete-duration-of-anesthesia-for-surgical-proceduresAnother Example of Insurers Putting Profits Over Patients
CHICAGO In an unprecedented move, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield plans representing Connecticut, New York and Missouri have unilaterally declared it will no longer pay for anesthesia care if the surgery or procedure goes beyond an arbitrary time limit, regardless of how long the surgical procedure takes. The American Society of Anesthesiologists calls on Anthem to reverse this proposal immediately.
Anesthesiologists provide individualized care to every patient, carefully assessing the patients health prior to the surgery, looking at existing diseases and medical conditions to determine the resources and medical expertise needed, attending to the patient during the entire procedure, resolving unexpected complications that may arise and/or extend the duration of the surgery, and working to ensure that the patient is comfortable during recovery.
Payment for anesthesia services is based on several factors, including the exact amount of time for anesthesiologists to deliver care preoperatively, during the operation, and when transitioning the patient to the recovery unit afterwards. With this new policy, Anthem will arbitrarily pre-determine the time allowed for anesthesia care during a surgery or procedure. If an anesthesiologist submits a bill where the actual time of care is longer than Anthem's limit, Anthem will deny payment for the anesthesiologists care. With this new policy, Anthem will not pay anesthesiologists for delivering safe and effective anesthesia care to patients who may need extra attention because their surgery is difficult, unusual or because a complication arises.
This is just the latest in a long line of appalling behavior by commercial health insurers looking to drive their profits up at the expense of patients and physicians providing essential care, said Donald E. Arnold, M.D., FACHE, FASA. Its a cynical money grab by Anthem, designed to take advantage of the commitment anesthesiologists make thousands of times each day to provide their patients with expert, complete and safe anesthesia care. This egregious policy breaks the trust between Anthem and its policyholders who expect their health insurer to pay physicians for the entirety of the care they need.
*snip*
Don't remember seeing this story in November. I'm guessing it resurfaced because of the insurance CEO being killed today.
ZonkerHarris
(25,342 posts)OMGWTF
(4,465 posts)I know someone who had a colonoscopy and woke up in the middle of it. Said it was the worst pain of their life. This is fking barbaric!!
xmas74
(29,779 posts)Is been in labor for 3 days, failure to progress and my blood pressure skyrocketed almost out of control. I had it done at 1:30 in the morning in a Saturday.
Two months later I received a letter from United rejecting payment because I didn't schedule the c section in advance.
soandso
(1,627 posts)What a bunch of bullshit!
After what happened today, I don't think I'd want to be an employee of a health insurance company.
xmas74
(29,779 posts)I lost. At the time they were getting away with denying claims left and right.
It took a few years but I paid it off.
soandso
(1,627 posts)and so much stress, as well as additional expense, when you'd just had a baby.
This shit has to change.
TBF
(34,552 posts)who jumped in to perform the emergency c-section (baby was literally stuck). They argued they would only pay for the delivery doctor - that the surgeon ($25K fee) was not covered. My husband happens to be an attorney & was in the delivery room. They did call in a capable surgeon to deal with the situation and save both of us. In the end UH paid. But I would expect it's much more difficult for families who aren't trained in the law - we had no problem threatening to sue them.
ChazInAz
(2,793 posts)Apparently the IV had slipped out of my vein. I wasn't in much pain, but I felt like I needed to cut a nuclear fart. Woozily, I mentioned this to the people shoving things into me. (Got a nice view on a TV screen of a place I'd never seen before.) The comment caused some alarm, and corrective measures were taken.
Demobrat
(9,921 posts)He says theres a contingent insisting his wife paid for this.
somehow women will always be blamed.
a spouse will be looked at and for spouses to kill spouses isn't unusual. Maybe the employees know something about their relationship. Maybe not.
TBF
(34,552 posts)in this case, given victim's profession, it wouldn't be the first place I'd look.
soandso
(1,627 posts)with those bullet casing having the words inscribed on the them which happen to come from the title of a book about insurance companies denying claims. I also read that he and his wife have lived apart for some time so that may be where the employee speculation arose.
Sure is an interesting case.
TBF
(34,552 posts)and that explains the rumor. I hadn't read that yet, but I haven't been seeking the stories out (read enough yesterday!).
soandso
(1,627 posts)A comment from her said he was a wonderful father but nothing about "and husband", so I wondered. She also mentioned he'd been receiving threats and something about "lack of coverage".
3Hotdogs
(13,484 posts)allegorical oracle
(3,254 posts)justifying the misdeed. If caught and tried, it causes me to wonder if they'll be able to find a jury that will indict the shooter.
And, if any good emerges, perhaps it will prompt insurance companies to wake up to how despised they are. (I would add most ALL insurance, not just health, is a scam.)
Karasu
(286 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 5, 2024, 06:26 AM - Edit history (1)
happen to a health insurance CEO and not a politician.
Frankly, I would 100% expect this to continue to happen until the health care system changes to one without a profit motive or the system/country collapses (and at this point, I know which one I'm betting on).
TommyT139
(732 posts)...how long until some open carry red state husband with a wife in labor crisis doesn't insist on her getting the care she needs.
I vaguely recall a version of this being a movie plot a lot time ago -- but a father and son?
Nigrum Cattus
(190 posts)We are the only 1st world nation that doesn't have universal healthcare.
Single payer or whatever form of universal healthcare is less expensive
in every way. The congress is responsible for the fix we are in.
Passages
(1,318 posts)No one believes this is fair, no one.
Coventina
(27,986 posts)markodochartaigh
(2,216 posts)gunning down people in the street.
I do predict, however, that if the killer is found and starts a GoFundMe for his defense, the amount received will dwarf the GDP of most countries.
Omnipresent
(6,420 posts)Driving the point home that denying claims will not be allowed.
magicarpet
(16,747 posts).... becomes alert and fully awake during brain surgery,... and is screaming in bloody pain.
The insurance company goes oh well,... we are after all entitled to a reasonable level of returns on our investments and profits. We owe that to our investors.
Boo-boos are supposed to be painful.
Now go pound sand.
Bo Zarts
(25,643 posts)It reminds me of a Mad Magazine cartoon back in the late '50s or early '60s. The docs are all gathered around the patient's bed, and the poor guy has a horrible look of pain on his face. In his hands is the bill for the services rendered. The caption of the cartoon was "The Presenting of the Bill."
enigmania
(224 posts)calimary
(84,496 posts)I LOVED all the illustrations, even the little bitty ones on the outside corners of the pages. Just blew my mind.
Prof. Toru Tanaka
(2,340 posts)Going by your description, I thought of the fold-ins.
I had a subscription to MAD in the 1970s and I always looked forward to receiving each issue.
Demobrat
(9,921 posts)and the insurance company refuses to pay them.
soandso
(1,627 posts)Seriously. Ain't that some stuff? I guess the brain doesn't feel anything and the patient gets a local in the scalp.
Anyway, this is is flat out insane. Only the doctors can stop this shit.
colorado_ufo
(5,934 posts)I used to work in surgery decades ago, and there are no pain receptors in the brain. Patients were awake and in no discomfort. it is often necessary to assess if the surgeon is in the correct area.
Hekate
(95,049 posts)Ponder that.
This is horrifying. I guess drive-thru mastectomies and drive-thru births just didnt give their shareholders enough warm fuzzies.
nilram
(3,003 posts)hahahahahahaha, I crack myself up.
soandso
(1,627 posts)Silent Type
(7,140 posts)When someone covered by Medicare goes into the hospital, Medicare will pay a set rate for the diagnosis, even if care takes several days more than expected. The hospital either absorbs it or files an appeal documenting the set rate was not enough because of complications, etc.
Besides-- Medicare and others are headed toward these payment models--
Medicare's bundled payment model, also known as episode-based payment (EBP), groups all costs associated with a patient's care into a single payment. This includes the fees for surgeons and anesthesiologists, as well as staff, supply, and facility costs. The goal of bundled payments is to improve the quality of care and patient experience while reducing costs.
soandso
(1,627 posts)They probably did that after years of getting bilked by hospital administrations. This must also be why the hospital is so eager to kick the patient out.
Silent Type
(7,140 posts)quickly that wasn't going to work because docs, hospitals and others caught on quickly that if they keep increasing their charges they'd get paid more.
In late 1970s and 1980s, Medicare reimbursement policies were changed to prevent the obvious greed. Medicaid and private insurers did the same.
soandso
(1,627 posts)Once payment was guaranteed, universities raised tuitions and salaries.
Irish_Dem
(58,803 posts)It is a way to force surgeons to refuse to take complicated cases.
They just tell the patient there is nothing that can be done.
Because they know they won't get paid if they take too long.
Unless you can find a very gifted surgeon who can do the complicated surgery
quickly you are out of luck.
lonely bird
(1,930 posts)Health insurance is not insurance. It is a casino where you provide the money that the house uses. All they are doing is making bets.
Joinfortmill
(16,557 posts)Lonestarblue
(11,929 posts)And Republicans keep voting for people who want to take their money but deny them healthcare. Nice racket when you can easily get away with it.
markodochartaigh
(2,216 posts)The US has a profit making system which produces as much profit as possible while producing as little health care as possible as a byproduct.
NBachers
(18,167 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(24,023 posts)Demobrat
(9,921 posts)Probably never knew what hit him. The patients to whom he denied care were not so lucky.
orwell
(7,985 posts)...now that the circus is coming to town.
Send in the Clowns...
DeeDeeNY
(3,522 posts)It didn't even deal with people who were uninsured. Only those who actually had health insurance. The level of cruelty exposed in the health care industry was scary.
calimary
(84,496 posts)enigmania
(224 posts)harboring great animus towards scumbag CEOs and their ilk when I was a young man, as I watched manufacturing disappear and prices rose. Never acted on it, of course.
70sEraVet
(4,198 posts)Her doctor came in, examined her, and said, "Well, when I check on you tomorrow, if you are still recovering at this rate, I may just release you tomorrow."
He walked out, and ten minutes later he walked back in, looking embarrassed.
"Your insurance company said you're ready to go home today."
We only exist for the benefit of their profit margins.
Seinan Sensei
(720 posts)RandySF
(70,954 posts)Joe Nation
(1,032 posts)Universal Healthcare!
Universal Healthcare!
Universal Healthcare!
Universal Healthcare!
Universal Healthcare!
Universal Healthcare!
Universal Healthcare!
Universal Healthcare!
Universal Healthcare!
NOW!
SheltieLover
(59,812 posts)Evolve Dammit
(18,955 posts)Demobrat
(9,921 posts)Evolve Dammit
(18,955 posts)Demobrat
(9,921 posts)Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield are separate companies.
Evolve Dammit
(18,955 posts)IronLionZion
(47,036 posts)Anthem is a for profit company within that federation. Anthem has such a shitty reputation that they changed their name to Elevance Health 2 years ago.
Evolve Dammit
(18,955 posts)Co-pays and deductibles go up every year. When will US get our act together? Not under newly elected admin that's for damn sure.
NGeorgian
(90 posts)MistakenLamb
(790 posts)not a good sign though especially with the incoming administration
Jeebo
(2,306 posts)And I live in Missouri. If I have to face surgery, I will have questions for the doctors.
Ron
MO policy but my surgery I discuss below was done over the state line in KS.
PufPuf23
(9,282 posts)The rich get richer at the cost of lives and quality of lives.
Rank and file medical professionals are worn to a nub.
leftstreet
(36,375 posts)orion9941
(258 posts)As a teenager I had a car accident that shattered my pelvis and crushed my ribs.
I was in surgery for 16 hours. God bless the surgeons, nurses, and everyone else.
But if this was in place at my worst when I needed grace the most, my parents would have been bankrupt!
I can't imagine going through injuries like that. You're lucky to be alive. Crushed ribs = can't breath.
xmas74
(29,779 posts)I had Anthem when I went in for a simple out patient removal of an ovarian cyst. The first incision made them realize immediately that it was bigger than they thought and it was cancer. Once they converted from a lapro to a fully open abdominal surgery is when they saw cancer also on the other ovary and in my uterus. They also discovered possibly decades of undiagnosed endometriosis all over the abdominal wall, kidneys,colon, and a vein. While scraping the endo they nicked a vein and I began to hemorrhage, needing several units of blood.
I'm telling this because my surgery went over by several hours. According to this policy I could be denied any more anesthesia after what was initially predicted to be no more than 40 minutes in and out. Can anyone imagine going through what I did without anesthesia?
People will die under this policy.
RainCaster
(11,594 posts)That could be the first of many if decisions like this are allowed to stand. What an awful company.
C Moon
(12,593 posts)Gee, I wonder what they will do.
pfitz59
(10,944 posts)But deleted it.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(10,369 posts)soandso
(1,627 posts)What will happen is doctors will refuse to accept that crappy insurance.
C Moon
(12,593 posts)soandso
(1,627 posts)I would also expect those states governments are going to say hell no and this will go to court.
moniss
(6,060 posts)the anesthesiologist didn't keep me under for the whole procedure. (I'm not saying it was this but I'm just relaying what it is like to come to while a procedure is still taking place.) So the person doing the colonoscopy needed to snip some polyps to send for examination. That all took place with me being under enough to not be able to scream, open my eyes or move but I was conscious enough to feel every bit of it.
NoMoreRepugs
(10,609 posts)I think YES.
Historic NY
(37,970 posts)its was always fun to get an additional bill. I required an active monitoring for any surgery due to a low heart rate, in including colonoscopy. I'd make the bells and other alarms go off. After my recent death and rebirth the gave me a defibrillator pacemaker and raised my heart rate.
Ms. Toad
(35,586 posts)A substantial number of anesthesiologists are out-of-network even when the hospital in which you are having surgery is in-network, so this may be a way of trying to rein in costs associated with the higher costs of care by an anesthesiologist.
When I was 5 months pregnant I had an emergency appendectomy. Insurance completely denied the claim by the anesthesiologist because they were out of network. They were eventually required to cover the costs - because the closest in-network anesthesiologist was 50 miles away. Not a good look to require a 5-month pregnant woman needing emergency surgery to research and find the only in-network anesthesiologist (and then to drive 50 miles to have surgery. (The anesthesia was complex, since they tried to operate with only an epidural to save my daughter from in-utero exposure to anesthesia. Unfortunately, they had to switch to anesthesia since there was too much pain associated with the surgery.)
I'm sure I'm not the only one who has successfully argued to get out-of-network anesthesia covered as in-network care, since most people are completely unaware that anesthesiologists are often not employed by the hospitals in which they work.
I'm not suggesting it is appropriate - just that there are reasons unique to anesthesiologists for special rules - and to some extent these rules are similar to the time limits insurance imposes, at least indirectly, on regular office visits (where payment is based on the time each kind of visit is allotted - and if the visit runs over (or the doctor chooses to schedule longer visits) there is no additional payment.
Martin68
(24,638 posts)Trump's win has given all the corrupt players in industry and politics permission to do whatever they want.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,912 posts)Yes, I know this doesn't result in anesthesiologists setting a timer, it just triggered an unfortunate memory.
orleans
(35,132 posts)better luck next time.
blue cross SUCKS
bmichaelh
(626 posts)This may not be limited to just Anthem.
Some of the BCBS across state lines have similar, if not identical, policies.
For example, in 2021, I was undergoing lymphoma treatment.
The drug was denied due to 'eligible for stem cell transplant'
It was successfully appealed.
I did some research on the internet and found out this reasoning was also used in another Blue Cross & Blue Shield.
Passages
(1,318 posts)The financial stress from debt can hinder cancer patients' recovery and even hasten death, researchers have found.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/06/16/1104969627/medical-debt-upended-their-lives-heres-what-it-took-from-them#:~:text=The%20debt%20forces%20many%20to,'%22
THE REMEDY IS UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE
No one needs to justify a man's murder but we do need to fix our lawmakers' addiction to legal bribes. Overturning Citizens United must be front and center on our political platform.
IronLionZion
(47,036 posts)so insurance companies want us to feel the pain. Meanwhile their stocks and profits are doing great.
Vinca
(51,157 posts)A stiff drink? Does Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield have any helpful hints?????
Buns_of_Fire
(17,901 posts)$100 for the next five minutes."