Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's BTC reserve plan would be a 'bad deal' -- Ex-NY Fed president
"Bill Dudley joined others in suggesting the only purpose of a US government Bitcoin reserve would be to reward Trumps crypto supporters."
Another former financial official with the United States government has expressed concerns about President-elect Donald Trumps intention to establish a national Bitcoin
reserve while in office.
In a Dec. 6 Bloomberg op-ed, economist and former New York Federal Reserve Bank President Bill Dudley said despite Bitcoins recent rise to more than $100,000, it was hard to fathom how the US government holding cryptocurrency would benefit residents.
Dudley said Bitcoin hardly qualifies as money, citing examples of people losing access to their crypto wallets and slow and expensive transactions.
However, the former Fed president suggested that one of the reasons Bitcoiners may support policies to establish a US reserve would be to send the price soaring rather than bestow benefits on non-hodlers.
Theres no exit strategy, so the purpose must be to push prices higher, not create value for the government which would be stuck holding volatile tokens that produce no income, said Dudley, adding:
To fund the purchases, either the Treasury would have to borrow (driving up debt service costs) or the Federal Reserve would have to create money (fueling inflation).
reserve while in office.
In a Dec. 6 Bloomberg op-ed, economist and former New York Federal Reserve Bank President Bill Dudley said despite Bitcoins recent rise to more than $100,000, it was hard to fathom how the US government holding cryptocurrency would benefit residents.
Dudley said Bitcoin hardly qualifies as money, citing examples of people losing access to their crypto wallets and slow and expensive transactions.
However, the former Fed president suggested that one of the reasons Bitcoiners may support policies to establish a US reserve would be to send the price soaring rather than bestow benefits on non-hodlers.
Theres no exit strategy, so the purpose must be to push prices higher, not create value for the government which would be stuck holding volatile tokens that produce no income, said Dudley, adding:
To fund the purchases, either the Treasury would have to borrow (driving up debt service costs) or the Federal Reserve would have to create money (fueling inflation).
https://cointelegraph.com/news/federal-reserve-president-donald-trump-bitcoin-reserve-plan-bad-deal
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 299 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's BTC reserve plan would be a 'bad deal' -- Ex-NY Fed president (Original Post)
Mike 03
Saturday
OP
no_hypocrisy
(49,041 posts)1. Crypto is not gold.
Gold at least retains, if not increases its value overall.
Crypto could easily lose its value with a sudden massive sell-off.
Which would you rather have as a national Treasury Reserve?
multigraincracker
(34,203 posts)2. Sure, like we need a tulip bulb reserve.
What could ever go wrong?
Irish_Dem
(58,803 posts)3. Doing good for the US is not a goal for Trump.
What is good for him is the only concern.