General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsZuckerberg lawyer skewers his 'toxic masculinity and Neo-Nazi madness' as he drops Meta as client
Mark Lemley, a Bay Area intellectual property attorney and Stanford Law School professor, had represented Meta in a proceeding over the companys alleged use of copyright texts for training artificial intelligence. The case, brought by a group of authors, could lead to precedent case law.
But Lemley couldnt rationalize what he called Facebooks descent into toxic masculinity and Neo-Nazi madness, he wrote on Bluesky.
On Monday, the attorney had been removed from the case and Metas roster. While Lemley believed his client was on the right side of the case, he said: I cannot in good conscience serve as their lawyer any longer.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/zuckerberg-lawyer-skewers-toxic-masculinity-201128907.html
SunSeeker
(54,298 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(11,046 posts)but at least that's something!
spanone
(137,986 posts)Thank you, Sir.
Irish_Dem
(62,278 posts)No laws, no ethics, no rules for the wealthy and powerful.
BadgerMom
(3,022 posts)Last week he said those of us who walked away from Meta products because of his sharp turn to the right are virtue signalling. He said it to diminish customers who have walked away from his unvetted platforms. I embrace virtue signalling. You bet I am virtue signalling. I have integrity, something the needy, thirsty Zuck does not.
https://www.livemint.com/news/us-news/mark-zuckerberg-says-users-exiting-meta-over-fact-checking-reforms-is-virtue-signaling-11736531091429.html
Skittles
(161,253 posts)UTUSN
(73,095 posts)Bird Lady
(1,969 posts)The problem is there are thousands of assholes with law degrees and no moral fiber, who will work for anyone the more odious the better.
Just as a side note: Zuckerberg is not a good example of masculine anything.