General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm really starting to fear TSF will withdraw from
NATO. Jesus Christ! (Could he do that on his own?)

lapfog_1
(30,645 posts)dem4decades
(12,415 posts)ms liberty
(10,002 posts)This timeline really sucks.
milestogo
(19,660 posts)reality.
He's already done that.
EndlessWire
(7,545 posts)say he supported NATO. Could it be that he said that to lie to Zelenskyy about the security measures needed for the deal?
Dorothy V
(176 posts)NATO is liable to kick us out!
Wouldn't blame them if they did.
Dynamic Unicorn
(27 posts)The US is the largest contributor to NATO, and it isnt by a little bit. 2/3 of NATO expenditure is by the US.
Unfortunately, NATO is completely reliant on the US and would collapse without our support.
harumph
(2,540 posts)Dynamic Unicorn
(27 posts)The US was 1 trillion of that. Roughly 2/3.
The simple fact is that European countries have not spent much on defense until recently after Ukraine was invaded, and still lag far behind the US.
It is important that the US remain in NATO and on good terms with our European allies.
Jacson6
(1,060 posts)However, The President can refuse to supply military support which would leave US troops in Europe to die in case of an invasion.
I can't believe I have to write this after being in NATO in Europe 40 years ago.
Volaris
(10,777 posts)SheltieLover
(63,519 posts)

Volaris
(10,777 posts)And nope...you're right.
SheltieLover
(63,519 posts)

ShazzieB
(19,558 posts)I don't know what he would have to do to get impeached at this point. It's hard to even imagine what it would take.
SheltieLover
(63,519 posts)Congrats on winning photo contest, btw!
Oved your entry!
ShazzieB
(19,558 posts)I totally missed that post, so you just had the honor of informing me!
dem4decades
(12,415 posts)We are so fucking screwed.
BBbats
(155 posts)Vinca
(51,663 posts)who knows. WWIII? A world war is about the only disaster Trump hasn't caused.
Emrys
(8,332 posts)Any scant credibility he believed he had as an honest broker in negotiations just went up in numerous puffs of smoke.
Tomorrow, Zelensky meets up with representatives from Europe in London. I'm sure the heightened solidarity will spill out of the room, and any remaining illusions about the role of Trump and the US under its current leadership will be gone.
My one regret is that they hadn't lined up Kaja Kallas for a visit to the White House tomorrow. She'd have pinned Trump and Vance's ears back.
Trump can't withdraw on his own, BTW. Biden covered that base, and it has to go through Congress.
As a sidelight: the EU has recently offered Zelensky a strategic minerals deal. I'm sure it would be much fairer than anything Trump might cook up, and would involve assurances about future security.
bluestarone
(18,982 posts)What they would do?
Emrys
(8,332 posts)Lancero
(3,125 posts)Won't care enough to protest things.
Even here, with everything that Trump has already done, many people still can't be bothered to support even a one day boycott.
Johnny2X2X
(22,424 posts)Russia has their eyes on a lot more than just Ukraine and the US will never oppose Russia under Trump. In fact, I can imagine where Russia invades a NATO country and Trump supplies Russia with US inteligence and weapons.
angrychair
(10,230 posts)That isn't how it works. That is a treaty and the NDAA has law written into it to prevent a president from leaving a treaty.
No not possible or realistic.
Response to bluestarone (Original post)
Post removed
bluestarone
(18,982 posts)
Response to bluestarone (Reply #20)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #23)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Post removed (Reply #19)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
Efilroft Sul
(3,880 posts)The former Warsaw Pact countries moved west after knowing what Soviet/Russian tyranny was like. They chose to be European and find strength in numbers. If Russia doesn't want to feel threatened by NATO, it could always choose to act lawful and civilized. But it has not.
cilla4progress
(26,193 posts)...
JustAnotherGen
(34,485 posts)It will allow the rest of them to go all in on the organization. And the moment we do - Ukraine needs to be allowed in.
At this moment - our involvement is preventing other members from going all in on Russia.
Susan Calvin
(2,220 posts)We are on our own, with nothing but Putin for an ally.
tishaLA
(14,540 posts)Hell, if Idi Amin were still around, we'd hold him in our warm embrace, too.
Raven123
(6,424 posts)tishaLA
(14,540 posts)aligning itself with other rogue nations.
LetMyPeopleVote
(159,200 posts)It looks like Europe is preparing in case trump does pull out of Nato.
Link to tweet
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/48021
Reports were conflicting on the exact shape of the to-be-announced defense spending package and on Friday officials across the continent told media talks were still ongoing multilaterally among European states, and inside the governments of countries key to that build-up like Britain, France and Germany.
A Thursday article published by the newswire agency Bloomberg said frantic talks among European Union defense and security leadership were working to unleash hundreds of billions of euros of additional financing for defense.
News reports in Paris, London and Berlin said first details of the arms build-up program would be announced at an emergency EU leaders meeting on March 6. A formal continental defense strategy will be announced by European Commission Defense Commissioner Adrius Kubilius and EU Foreign Minister Kaja Kallas on Marth 19.
ecstatic
(34,648 posts)The world order is about to shift.