Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OnDoutside

(20,860 posts)
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:18 AM Mar 2025

What exactly would need to happen for Trump to run for a 3rd (turd) time ? In terms of changing laws or getting a

Supreme Court opinion ?

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What exactly would need to happen for Trump to run for a 3rd (turd) time ? In terms of changing laws or getting a (Original Post) OnDoutside Mar 2025 OP
Dictators don't follow any laws gab13by13 Mar 2025 #1
Do not give this foolish idea any oxygen. Why even state it? travelingthrulife Mar 2025 #2
Because I think (from what we've seen of their behaviour so far) that it is a greater than 50% chance they'll try it. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #6
A near certainty he will try, if he is still alive. He has never intended to leave. GoodRaisin Mar 2025 #31
Yep, it would be a big mistake to think he won't try. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #33
Bannon has already discussed it OnDoutside Mar 2025 #8
Exactly Blue_Roses Mar 2025 #10
That's our version of "Don't look up!" Burying our heads is HOW WE GOT HERE. Maru Kitteh Mar 2025 #28
A constitutional amendment would be necessary Beausoleil Mar 2025 #3
Biden in 2020, the courts have stopped a lot of what he wants EdmondDantes_ Mar 2025 #18
If he lives that long, and a Constitutional amendment changing the 22nd. Ocelot II Mar 2025 #4
Or, if someone brought it before the SC to "test" the constitutionality, what are the odds that a Trump court would OnDoutside Mar 2025 #11
A constitutional amendment can't be unconstitutional, by definition. Ocelot II Mar 2025 #15
The Constitution is always constitutional... JCMach1 Mar 2025 #17
Technically, a constitutional amendment. Torchlight Mar 2025 #5
I think legally it would be a huge challenge, a constitutional change. defacto7 Mar 2025 #7
In practice, he can get away with it the same way he can be president after starting an insurrection unblock Mar 2025 #9
Yes, that's the type of thing I am expecting. Which makes the midterms so so important. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #13
If that's the case Blue_Roses Mar 2025 #12
You might be onto something there ! OnDoutside Mar 2025 #14
Many rules apply to democrats that don't seem to apply to republicans.... unblock Mar 2025 #19
I've unfortunately noticed... Blue_Roses Mar 2025 #21
I have a feeling he will not be physically able too.nt Tribetime Mar 2025 #16
The technofascists will have no need for a front man by 2028 JCMach1 Mar 2025 #20
They could prop up his dead carcass a la "Weekend At Bernie's" and they'd still vote for him. Wednesdays Mar 2025 #22
22nd Amendment, Section 1 reads... ProudMNDemocrat Mar 2025 #23
It can't be done without another constitutional amendment to repeal it. valleyrogue Mar 2025 #24
Regardless of who has an interest in this, looking at him, it'll be most likely the Grim Reaper. marble falls Mar 2025 #25
Under current law, I'd expect many blue states to not allow him on the ballot. RobertDevereaux Mar 2025 #26
Great point OnDoutside Mar 2025 #27
38 states ratifying a constitutional amendment, but then Obama can run again too krawhitham Mar 2025 #29
Authoritarian option #1: Ignore the constitution and cow the justice system into submission. Eugene Mar 2025 #30
And they could declare a war on the Houthis and declare himself a wartime president like Zelenskyy. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #35
I'm surprised he's not running already Diraven Mar 2025 #32
Yes, this is the most obvious way....up is down and down is up. OnDoutside Mar 2025 #34
Tamping down the third term hype for Trump LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #36
MaddowBlog-Despite the Constitution, Trump says he's 'not joking' about eyeing a third term LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #37
I also doubt that trump will be around for a third term LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #38
Only the good die young, so that bstard will be around forever. OnDoutside Apr 2025 #39
I assume he would run, possibly win, his VP would eventually become president Johonny Apr 2025 #40

OnDoutside

(20,860 posts)
6. Because I think (from what we've seen of their behaviour so far) that it is a greater than 50% chance they'll try it.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:23 AM
Mar 2025

OnDoutside

(20,860 posts)
8. Bannon has already discussed it
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:25 AM
Mar 2025
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5202578-steve-bannon-chris-cuomo-donald-trump-third-term-ambitions/

Former White House strategist Steve Bannon leaned into President Trump’s aspirations for a third term, suggesting Trump will run and win in 2028 while denying his own presidential ambitions.

“I’m a firm believer that President Trump will run and win again in 2028, so I’ve already endorsed President Trump,” Bannon told NewsNation’s Chris Cuomo. “A man like this comes along once every century, if we’re lucky. We’ve got him now.”

“He’s on fire, and I’m a huge supporter. Want to see him again in 2028,” he added in an appearance on “CUOMO.”

Trump has floated the idea of running for a third presidential term a number of times despite it being unconstitutional with the 22nd Amendment, which limits politicians to two presidential terms.

Maru Kitteh

(31,234 posts)
28. That's our version of "Don't look up!" Burying our heads is HOW WE GOT HERE.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 10:54 AM
Mar 2025

Let’s try being prepared for the shit they pull, for once. It might even become a habit! That would be helpful.



Beausoleil

(3,008 posts)
3. A constitutional amendment would be necessary
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:21 AM
Mar 2025

but who has stopped Trump yet? He is planning running again and the fix will be in.

EdmondDantes_

(1,339 posts)
18. Biden in 2020, the courts have stopped a lot of what he wants
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:47 AM
Mar 2025

Republican dysfunction stopped any legislation other than the stupid tax cut in 2017. And the Democrats controlling Congress in 2018 stopped any other legislation. McCain stopped his attempt to kill the ACA.

Ocelot II

(128,975 posts)
4. If he lives that long, and a Constitutional amendment changing the 22nd.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:22 AM
Mar 2025

The 22nd amendment prohibits anyone who has been elected president twice from being elected again.

OnDoutside

(20,860 posts)
11. Or, if someone brought it before the SC to "test" the constitutionality, what are the odds that a Trump court would
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:32 AM
Mar 2025

just make stuff up that this is not what the amendment meant ?

Ocelot II

(128,975 posts)
15. A constitutional amendment can't be unconstitutional, by definition.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:44 AM
Mar 2025

There's no way to test a constitutional amendment for constitutionality (unless maybe the procedures for the amendment weren't followed), only for interpretation. The 22nd says: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once." There's not much room there for interpretation. In fact, if we were to accept Trump's claim that he actually won the 2020 election, he wasn't eligible to be elected in 2024.

JCMach1

(29,078 posts)
17. The Constitution is always constitutional...
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:46 AM
Mar 2025

He cant assume the Presidency unless its Amended.

Full stop.

Torchlight

(6,285 posts)
5. Technically, a constitutional amendment.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:22 AM
Mar 2025

In practical term in the here and now though, I have much less faith that this constitutional mechanism would be the chosen tool by the current administration.

defacto7

(14,159 posts)
7. I think legally it would be a huge challenge, a constitutional change.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:23 AM
Mar 2025

Otherwise they'd have to find a way to ignore the constitution.

unblock

(55,896 posts)
9. In practice, he can get away with it the same way he can be president after starting an insurrection
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:29 AM
Mar 2025

The clean way would be a constitutional amendment allowing him to be elected to a third term.

The Republican corrupt way would be to just run him anyway, and when some state objects to putting him on the ballot, the supremes could just say they don't have standing or otherwise don't have the right to make the determination that he's ineligible. Obviously corrupt, but that's basically how they prevented Colorado from removing him from the ballot in 2024.

Finally, a loophole is that the constitution bans him from being *elected* to a third term, but technically not from *serving* a third term. So a couple stooges could run for potus/vpotus, Donnie gets named speaker of the house, and immediately after being sworn in, the stooges resign, making Donnie president.

OnDoutside

(20,860 posts)
13. Yes, that's the type of thing I am expecting. Which makes the midterms so so important.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:41 AM
Mar 2025

Blue_Roses

(13,765 posts)
12. If that's the case
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:33 AM
Mar 2025

then President Obama could run too. But, I don't see any of this happening. I just don't want to see Vance in there either.

JCMach1

(29,078 posts)
20. The technofascists will have no need for a front man by 2028
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:48 AM
Mar 2025

It will be their boy Vance.

Wednesdays

(21,566 posts)
22. They could prop up his dead carcass a la "Weekend At Bernie's" and they'd still vote for him.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:55 AM
Mar 2025

No need for a warm body so long as they have an idol object to worship.

ProudMNDemocrat

(20,602 posts)
23. 22nd Amendment, Section 1 reads...
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 09:57 AM
Mar 2025

No person shall be elected to the Office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the Office of the President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the Office of the President more than once.

The ONLY exception was VP Gerald Ford, who assumed the Presidency after the resignation of Richard Nixon in August of 1974. Ford was eligible to run for a full term in 1976. Had he won, he would also be eligible to run in 1980.

Donald Trump is a LAME DUCK. He is NOT eligible to run again in 2028 regardless of what he says or tries to do in the interim. The 22nd Amendment is clear on that.

valleyrogue

(2,564 posts)
24. It can't be done without another constitutional amendment to repeal it.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 10:17 AM
Mar 2025

Prohibition repeal comes to mind.

Trump is going to be gone long before then. He is pushing 80 now.

marble falls

(70,907 posts)
25. Regardless of who has an interest in this, looking at him, it'll be most likely the Grim Reaper.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 10:33 AM
Mar 2025

RobertDevereaux

(2,022 posts)
26. Under current law, I'd expect many blue states to not allow him on the ballot.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 10:49 AM
Mar 2025

Write-ins would not sufficiently counter that.

Eugene

(66,783 posts)
30. Authoritarian option #1: Ignore the constitution and cow the justice system into submission.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 10:55 AM
Mar 2025

Rump and allies just launched an all-out attack on the rule of law.
That attack on law firms is not just a shakedown, it's about
shutting uncooperative litigators out of the federal courts.

Option #2: The constitution means what our judges say.
They are also promoting the argument that the constitution only
blocks a third term after two consecutive terms.
Therefore, Rump could run while Obama would be disqualified.
The law means what they get their hand-picked judges say.

EDIT:
I almost forgot Option #3: Go full authoritarian and cancel elections.
In cases of authoritarian breakthrough, believe the autocrat.
He means what he says. Trust Rump to make good on his
promise to the Christian nationalists, that 2024 would be
the last election they'd have to fight.

OnDoutside

(20,860 posts)
35. And they could declare a war on the Houthis and declare himself a wartime president like Zelenskyy.
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 11:59 AM
Mar 2025

Diraven

(1,818 posts)
32. I'm surprised he's not running already
Wed Mar 26, 2025, 11:36 AM
Mar 2025

Basically he could just run, regardless of what the law and the Constitution says. When he inevitably gets the Republican nomination they'll just say he's our candidate and then demand states put him on the ballot. When some blue states refuse the case would go before the Supreme Court, and the conservative majority there would definitely find some pretense to rule he gets to run, because otherwise a Democrat would almost certainly win and they can't allow that.

LetMyPeopleVote

(174,729 posts)
36. Tamping down the third term hype for Trump
Sun Mar 30, 2025, 06:19 PM
Mar 2025

Believe or not, this issue was discussed a while back when there were discussions about Bill Clinton running as vice-president on a Gore-Clinton ticket. The thought was that Gore would resign after the election and President Clinton could serve a third term. This concept was discussed and rejected.

The three ways that trump could run for a third term (i) a constitutional amendment, (ii) trump running as vice president and then have his running mate resign and (iii) trump becoming speaker of the house and then the POTUS and Vice President resigning.

A constitutional amendment is not likely. https://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3380306 It is unlikely that such an amendment could get through congress much less be ratified by the required number of states.

The third option has so many variables that it is also unlikely. trump would have to be appointed/elected as Speaker and then both the POTUS and the VP resign. This option does not have the 12th Amendment issue but has so many variables that it is unlikely

The 12th Amendment is clear that no one can run as VP if they are not eligible to run as POTUS. I agree with the legal analysis set forth below.




https://electionlawblog.org/?p=149214
As I told the Associated Press:

Derek Muller, a professor of election law at Notre Dame, noted that the 12th Amendment, which was ratified in 1804, says “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”

Muller said that indicates that if Trump is not eligible to run for president again because of the 22nd Amendment, he is not eligible to run for vice president, either.

“I don’t think there’s any ‘one weird trick’ to getting around presidential term limits,” Muller said.

In addition, pursuing a third term would require extraordinary acquiescence by federal and state officials, not to mention the courts and voters themselves.

He suggested that Trump is talking about a third term for political reasons to “show as much strength as possible.”


Now, there’s no question there is potential constitutional ambiguity here, as Professor Brian Kalt has discussed. But scholars like Professor Michael Dorf a quarter century ago were bolstering the idea of a Gore-Clinton ticket in 2000:

Thus, if Clinton were to be elected Vice President, and ascend to the Presidency based on, for example, Mr. Gore’s resignation, then nothing unconstitutional would have occurred. Clinton would have been elected to the Presidency only twice — though he would serve as President thrice. Under the Twenty-Second Amendment, that is perfectly permissible.

. . . But in seeking the Vice-Presidency — a job, in John Nance Garner’s unforgettable phrase, “not worth a bucket of warm spit” — Clinton would hardly be bidding for dictatorial powers.


Similar claims were made by Professor Brian Gray and elsewhere. But in my earlier scholarship, I found this interpretation weaker than the one advanced by Matthew Franck:

It follows from the 22nd Amendment that Bill Clinton, being “constitutionally ineligible” to be elected president, is ineligible to become president by another route. He is, in short, ineligible to be president, and therefore ineligible to become vice president under the 12th amendment.


I agree. But it’s worth noting that if–and I think it’s still a big if–such a gambit arose, there are tremendous complexities in its implementation. Not the least of which is the fact that after Trump v. Anderson, I believe the Court expressly left open the opportunity for states to review qualifications of presidential (and vice-presidential) candidates outside of the 14th Amendment and exclude candidates on that basis. Vice presidential nominations and ballot access deadlines for them occur in late summer, giving an exceedingly truncated window for review–and, frankly, one that may leave a major party without a vice presidential candidate on the ballot in several states with the approval of the United States Supreme Court. (Setting aside, of course, the will power of someone like J.D. Vance relinquishing the presidency.)

I really enjoy Professor Hasen's election law blog. This article made me smile.

Finally, I doubt that trump will live long enough for these options to be necessary.

LetMyPeopleVote

(174,729 posts)
37. MaddowBlog-Despite the Constitution, Trump says he's 'not joking' about eyeing a third term
Mon Mar 31, 2025, 11:53 AM
Mar 2025

The 22nd Amendment says, “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” The incumbent president doesn't fully accept that.

If you're just catching up on news from the weekend, Trump said he's "not joking" about possibly trying to pursue a third term.

The Constitution says, "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice." Trump apparently doesn't accept that. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-03-31T11:58:35.374Z

If you're just catching up on news from the weekend, Trump said he's "not joking" about possibly trying to pursue a third term.

The Constitution says, "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice." Trump apparently doesn't accept that.



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/constitution-trump-says-s-not-joking-eyeing-third-term-rcna198827

This strategy came to mind anew upon hearing the Republican talk about possibly pursuing a third term in the White House. NBC News reported:

President Donald Trump did not rule out the possibility of seeking a third term in the White House, which is prohibited by the Constitution under the 22nd Amendment, saying in an exclusive interview with NBC News that there were methods for doing so and clarifying that he was “not joking.” ... “A lot of people want me to do it,” Trump said in a Sunday-morning phone call with NBC News, referring to his allies.


.....In fact, in his interview with NBC News, Trump was hardly subtle. “I’m not joking,” he said, adding that there are “methods” in which he could pursue such a goal.

NBC News asked about a possible scenario in which Vice President JD Vance would run for office and then pass the role to Trump. Trump responded that “that’s one” method. “But there are others, too,” Trump added. Asked to share another method, Trump simply responded “no.”


Hours after the NBC News report reached the public, the president chatted with reporters aboard Air Force One and dodged a series of questions on the topic, though he claimed that “people” have asked him to run for a third term — which he said would be a fourth term “in a way” because his 2020 race was “totally rigged.” (It was not rigged; he lost fair and square, and he’s been lying uncontrollably about this for more than four years.).....

I won’t pretend to know where this is headed or the degree to which the president is prepared to defy constitutional law. But Scott Cummings, a professor of legal ethics at the UCLA School of Law, made a comment on "The Rachel Maddow Show" on Friday that stood out for me.

Commenting on autocracies around the world that have consolidated power, Cummings noted that in none of these countries “do leaders do all the things that Trump is doing, take aim at all of these independent institutions, and then just walk away.” Rather, the professor added, authoritarians take these steps because they intend “to stay in power permanently.”

trump needs to stay in power and will try to stay in power anyway that he can

Johonny

(25,383 posts)
40. I assume he would run, possibly win, his VP would eventually become president
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 03:36 PM
Apr 2025

and he would whisk away as a three-time winner.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What exactly would need t...