Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWelcome Back John Fetterman
He actually stood up to Shitler with a pro Union post on X. I just hope this isn't a case of a broken clock being correct two times day.
U.S. Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) is responding on X to the Politico report “Trump moves to strip unionization rights from most federal workers” by writing “See yinz in court.” The Pennsylvania Democrat, who took criticism from some supporters for flying to Mar-a-Lago and seeking an amiable instead of rancorous relationship with Trump, closely aligns his political identity with working class people.
[NOTE: Fetterman often uses the colloquial “yinz and youse” to describe his constituency.]
MAGA supporters are pushing back on Fetterman’s comment and flooding him with comments including “federal employees don’t need unions.”
One MAGA objector elaborated: “I’m sorry, @JohnFetterman, government employees at an level should not be unionized. Their bosses have no incentive to keep costs under control when negotiating contracts. Governments and unions are in bed together.”
Another expressed surprise at Fetterman’s stance, although the Senator has always been a supporter of labor unions. She wrote: “@JohnFetterman you have consistently amazed me with your common sense approach to respond on this administration and the decisions it is making. I'm shocked that you would think a union is necessary for federal employees. Help me understand your rationale. Genuinely curious.”...
[NOTE: Fetterman often uses the colloquial “yinz and youse” to describe his constituency.]
MAGA supporters are pushing back on Fetterman’s comment and flooding him with comments including “federal employees don’t need unions.”
One MAGA objector elaborated: “I’m sorry, @JohnFetterman, government employees at an level should not be unionized. Their bosses have no incentive to keep costs under control when negotiating contracts. Governments and unions are in bed together.”
Another expressed surprise at Fetterman’s stance, although the Senator has always been a supporter of labor unions. She wrote: “@JohnFetterman you have consistently amazed me with your common sense approach to respond on this administration and the decisions it is making. I'm shocked that you would think a union is necessary for federal employees. Help me understand your rationale. Genuinely curious.”...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fetterman-tells-trump-see-yinz-in-court-after-major-worker-threat/ar-AA1BRMcS?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=b9c1e79efb684eb8afcdbdb8b1d6d5bc&ei=14
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Welcome Back John Fetterman (Original Post)
Norbert
Friday
OP
Autumn
(47,619 posts)1. Welcome back for one pro union post? That seems vaguely familiar
Ms. Toad
(36,433 posts)2. All those federal workers laid off "for cause" probably beg to differ with the MAGAts
contending federal workers don't need unions. Wasn't it a union that sued to get them back their jobs?
Aristus
(69,497 posts)3. Yeah, but for how long? When is the next time he dives to the right?
n/t
videohead5
(2,585 posts)4. Did you notice
That after last year's election he started drifting toward Trump and now after those state elections in Pennsylvania went Democrat he's drifting back. He's got his finger stuck in the air.
displacedvermoter
(3,629 posts)5. Hope he is not too bummed about not being able
to vote to confirm Stefanik for UN Ambassador.