General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt just gets worse
Hegseth's wife brought along to sensitive meetings with foreign officials.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is facing scrutiny over his handling of details of a military strike, brought his wife, a former Fox News producer, to two meetings with foreign military counterparts where sensitive information was discussed, according to multiple people who were present or had knowledge of the discussions.
One of the meetings, a high-level discussion at the Pentagon on March 6 between Hegseth and U.K. Secretary of Defense John Healey, took place at a sensitive moment for the trans-Atlantic alliance, one day after the U.S. said it had cut off military intelligence sharing with Ukraine. The group that met at the Pentagon, which included Adm. Tony Radakin, the head of the U.K.’s armed forces, discussed the U.S. rationale behind that decision, as well as future military collaboration between the two allies, according to people familiar with the meeting.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/hegseth-brought-his-wife-to-sensitive-meetings-with-foreign-military-officials/ar-AA1BSglZ?ocid=AMZN

CanonRay
(15,168 posts)TommyT139
(1,108 posts)She could claim she couldn't sleep with him for a year, or until he has a year sober, whichever is longer.
SheltieLover
(65,626 posts)
Deuxcents
(21,555 posts)People paying big bucks for the “successful” mission. My head spins at the chaos as my heart breaks at the callousness they display for us and our allies.
gab13by13
(27,325 posts)and I will work for free.
Every Congressional Democrat must agree to repeat my messages, and they need to seek out microphones.
For example: When SignalGate broke, every Democrat must lead off with, "Hegseth and Waltz must resign, or be fired by Trump." No matter what question they are asked this must be their first response and it must be forceful. Then they can move on to holding investigations to make sure that our security is protected.
Another example:
When Trump attacks Canada and Denmark as bad allies, every Democrat must lead off with, "Canadian and Denmark soldiers fought and died for us in Iraq and Afghanistan, our president and VP have disrespected their sacrifice and I demand that they apologize to the families of their fallen soldiers' loved ones." No matter what question they are asked about Canada and Greenland, this must be their first response.
Congressional Democrats are horrible at messaging and controlling the narrative.
Not sure who is in charge of hiring me (for free) but PM me at DU.
surfered
(5,800 posts)His only experience is with a pod cast. Nepo baby or DEI hire?
cliffside
(859 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(160,734 posts)As Pete Hegseth flails, there are apparently Pentagon insiders eager to talk about the defense secretary’s struggles.
https://bsky.app/profile/stevebenen.com/post/3llopdxucnk2a
Hegseth's other problem: There appear to be Pentagon insiders who are willing to talk to reporters about his incompetence, failures, and abuses
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/allegations-hegseth-mount-pentagon-chief-faces-new-kind-problem-rcna198856
It’s common for the Defense Department and other federal agencies to have liaisons. Each military branch sends liaisons to Capitol Hill. The Pentagon, State Department and others all use interagency liaisons to more closely coordinate and keep tabs on policy. But it is not common for those senior-level positions to be filled by family members of the Cabinet heads....
Despite Hegseth’s apparent preoccupation with merit-based employment decisions, his younger brother received a position of influence at the Pentagon despite a background as the founder of a podcast production company.
Around the same time, The Wall Street Journal published another report about the defense secretary that raised eyebrows:
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is facing scrutiny over his handling of details of a military strike, brought his wife, a former Fox News producer, to two meetings with foreign military counterparts where sensitive information was discussed, according to multiple people who were present or had knowledge of the discussions.
The Journal’s report, which has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, added that a Defense secretary “can invite anyone to meetings with visiting counterparts, but attendee lists are usually carefully limited to those who need to be there and attendees are typically expected to possess security clearances given the delicate nature of the discussions.”....
The reporting from the AP and the Journal dovetailed with a Politico report that said while Donald Trump has expressed public support for Hegseth, “behind the scenes, administration insiders are starting to express doubts about the Pentagon chief’s judgment.” CNN had a related piece that said, “Interviews with multiple current and former national security officials this week, including career military and civilian officials, reflect growing concerns about Hegseth’s leadership at the Pentagon.”
Taken individually, the revelations about his brother’s job and his wife’s access are certainly important in their own right. But let’s not overlook the story behind the stories: It appears increasingly obvious that there are some people at the Pentagon who’ve learned some unfortunate things about Hegseth, and they’re suddenly eager to share that information with journalists.
Or put another way, two months into Hegseth’s tenure, he’s generating the kind of chatter that his respected and qualified predecessor didn’t have to worry about at the department he ostensibly leads.
It’s a problem for the Pentagon chief that there’s evidence of his incompetence, abuses and failures, but it’s just as notable a problem that there are DOD insiders who are apparently willing to talk to reporters about his incompetence, abuses and failures.