Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(74,973 posts)
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 03:09 PM Apr 1

LEAVITT: There's a lot of evidence. DHS and ICE have that evidence and I saw it this morning."

So, simpletons like Leavitt are allowed to see classified info but our Democrat Senators are not allowed. damn,


‪Aaron Rupar‬ ‪@atrupar.com‬
·
2h
REPORTER: The vice president said he was a convicted member of MS-13. What evidence is there to back that up?


LEAVITT: There's a lot of evidence. DHS and ICE have that evidence and I saw it this morning."
https://bsky.app/profile/keptsimple.bsky.social/post/3llrfnl6zps2j

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LEAVITT: There's a lot of evidence. DHS and ICE have that evidence and I saw it this morning." (Original Post) riversedge Apr 1 OP
Honesty Cirsium Apr 1 #1
It's kind of the old saying: America, love it or Leavitt. Dave Bowman Apr 1 #5
They're all lying. Solly Mack Apr 1 #2
Or tonkatoy8888 Apr 1 #3
Yeah right, just like the WMDs in Iraq. JohnSJ Apr 1 #4
I wouldn't assume this person is telling the truth. Mike 03 Apr 1 #6
She, the press mouthpiece. niyad Apr 1 #8
Leavitt's nothing more than AI in human form. A possible cyborg. She doesn't even allegorical oracle Apr 1 #7
They lie like other people breathe. Irish_Dem Apr 1 #9
So Judge Boasberg is not allowed to see the evidence, sensitive "state secrets" Arazi Apr 1 #10
A Reporter actually asked a relevant follow-up question Wiz Imp Apr 1 #11
The real question we should be asking LittleWoman Apr 1 #12
Unless we see it wryter2000 Apr 1 #13

Dave Bowman

(4,941 posts)
5. It's kind of the old saying: America, love it or Leavitt.
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 03:16 PM
Apr 1

And they sure hate it so let's move to Russia, traitors.

Mike 03

(18,329 posts)
6. I wouldn't assume this person is telling the truth.
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 03:21 PM
Apr 1

He probably got a call. "Go out and say something... Tell the media you've seen the evidence."

allegorical oracle

(4,549 posts)
7. Leavitt's nothing more than AI in human form. A possible cyborg. She doesn't even
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 03:23 PM
Apr 1

know she's lying -- any more than TSF knows he is.

Arazi

(7,693 posts)
10. So Judge Boasberg is not allowed to see the evidence, sensitive "state secrets"
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 03:36 PM
Apr 1

But the White House press secretary gets full access?

🙄

#GOPLies

Wiz Imp

(4,648 posts)
11. A Reporter actually asked a relevant follow-up question
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 03:45 PM
Apr 1
https://www.yahoo.com/news/karoline-leavitt-lies-her-mouth-174940067.html

“You said you’d seen evidence that this man was a convicted gang member. In what court was he convicted and for what?” a different reporter followed up.


Leavitt's "answer"? A long string of bullshit word salad that never mentions a court or what the man was convicted for.

“This individual was an MS-13 ring leader. This individual was engaged in human trafficking. And I’m glad you brought up this point again, because if you just saw the headline from insane, failing Atlantic magazine this morning, you would think this individual was father of the year, living in Maryland, living a peaceful life when that couldn’t be further from the truth. They didn’t even mention in the title of that article, or even in the first paragraph, that this individual is an illegal criminal who broke our nation’s immigration laws. He is a leader in the brutal MS-13 gang, and he is involved in human trafficking. And now MS-13 is a designated foreign terrorist organization.”


Anyone need more proof that she's lying?

LittleWoman

(268 posts)
12. The real question we should be asking
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 03:54 PM
Apr 1

The real question we should be asking is how in the name of all that is holy is it legal for the U S to deport/send anyone to a foreign prison? The only legal choices are either to deport them to their country of origin after a legal hearing or if they have committed a crime to try them and sentence them to a U S prison and then deport them when they have served their sentence. Sending Venezuelans to a prison in El Salvador is NOT deporting them!

The answer to my question is that what is being done is not in any way legal period.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»LEAVITT: There's a lot of...