MaddowBlog-As Trump's executive orders top 100, his earlier promises to voters got ignored

[LetMyPeopleVote]

Trump used to condemn executive orders, slamming them as evidence of inept presidential leadership. That was before he dramatically changed his mind.
https://bsky.app/profile/stevebenen.com/post/3llraiqifw22g

Before: Trump condemned executive orders, slamming them as evidence of an inept president who doesn't know how to make deals or work with Congress.

Now: Trump is boasting about signing 100 executive orders in 10 weeks, outpacing his predecessors

Link to tweet

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-executive-orders-top-100-earlier-promises-voters-go-ignored-rcna199076

It’s easy to sympathize with those who’ve struggled to keep up with Donald Trump’s flood-the-zone approach to executive orders. Indeed, as of last week, the president surpassed 100 executive orders before his second term even reached the 70-day mark. The Republican signed more EOs in the first two months of his second term than in the first two years of his first term.

The New York Times’ Carlos Lozada, who took on the unenviable task of reading each of the president’s directives, explained in his latest column:

The executive order is Trump’s preferred governing tool. Even with Republican congressional majorities, he favors the flourish of the order over the hassle of lawmaking. Why bother assembling legislative coalitions when you can just write, “By the authority vested in me as president by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered” and then tack on whatever you like?

To be sure, each of the orders deserves to be considered on the individual merits, but stepping back, it’s also worth appreciating the degree to which Trump promised Americans a very different approach to exercising presidential power.....

The same month, at a primary debate, Trump vowed, “I would build consensus with Congress, and Congress would agree with me. ... I don’t like the idea of using executive orders like our president. It is a disaster what [Obama’s] doing. I would build consensus, but consensus means you have to work hard. You have to cajole. You have to get them into the Oval Office and get them all together, and you have to make deals.”

Perhaps the best line of them all was delivered in January 2016, when Trump told CNN his thoughts on the “executive-order concept.” The future president explained, “You know, it’s supposed to be negotiated. You’re supposed to cajole, get people in a room, you have Republicans, Democrats, you’re supposed to get together and pass a law. [Obama] doesn’t want to do that because it’s too much work. So he doesn’t want to work too hard. He wants to go back and play golf.”

Eight years later, Trump isn’t just signing executive orders on a nearly daily basis, he’s publicly bragging about the fact that he’s signing more orders than any of his presidential predecessors.

The Republican has not yet explained when or why he changed his mind about the “executive-order concept,” but I’m eager to hear him elaborate on the subject.

[Wiz Imp]

1. Didn't Trump and Republicans say it was illegal to issue so many EOs

when Obama & Biden issued far fewer than Trump? And Obama & Biden generally issued them only after trying (and failing) to get Congress to pass legislation. Trump hasn't even tried to get Congress to pass any laws. He's doing this to explicitly circumvent Congress. And how many of those 100 have been unconstitutional? I'm sure it is well over 50%, and many of the remainder are effectively meaningless (like the Gulf of America nonsense).