Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Maddow Blog-Why the Trump administration's deportations policy crushes U.S. credibility
To hear Pam Bondi tell it, immigrants might have followed the law and played by the rules, but the Trump administration has decided to no longer care.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-administrations-deportations-policy-crushes-us-credibility-rcna200439
In other words, American laws were all fine and good, but as far as the future vice president was concerned, a Trump/Vance administration would be free to decide who is and is not in the country legally — not based on laws, but rather, on their whims.
Three weeks later, without a month to go before Election Day, Trump echoed his running mate’s sentiment: Haitian migrants, he said, who’d been given Temporary Protected Status and were in the U.S. legally, were “illegal immigrants as far as I’m concerned.”
But it wasn’t a matter of opinion. Trump’s baseless assumptions were irrelevant. In a system rooted in the rule of law, questions about illegalities aren’t supposed to come alongside politicians using the phrase “as far as I’m concerned.”
All of this came to mind anew on Tuesday when Attorney General Pam Bondi briefly spoke to reporters outside the White House.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhdclvdlmmynkwsmg5tdc/post/3lmcw6dq6ji2x
When NBC News’ Peter Alexander asked Bondi, “Should those individuals who followed the rules as they existed at the time be forced to leave the country now?” the nation’s chief law enforcement official replied, “Well, Peter, the rules at the time weren’t fair. The rules were dangerous to Americans.”.....
This approach is rooted in the idea that the United States is led, not by laws and institutions, but by a mercurial ruler who’ll tell us what’s true, until he changes his mind, at which point everyone will be expected to keep up.
At a congressional hearing yesterday, Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada asked a Trump nominee, “Why would any country want to do business with us, much less negotiate a trade deal, if we don’t even honor our ongoing agreements?”
The senator was referring to the White House’s trade tariffs, but it’s a question with broad applicability. The credibility of the United States is taking a beating, and thanks to Trump and his team, it's difficult to know when, or if, it will recover.
Three weeks later, without a month to go before Election Day, Trump echoed his running mate’s sentiment: Haitian migrants, he said, who’d been given Temporary Protected Status and were in the U.S. legally, were “illegal immigrants as far as I’m concerned.”
But it wasn’t a matter of opinion. Trump’s baseless assumptions were irrelevant. In a system rooted in the rule of law, questions about illegalities aren’t supposed to come alongside politicians using the phrase “as far as I’m concerned.”
All of this came to mind anew on Tuesday when Attorney General Pam Bondi briefly spoke to reporters outside the White House.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhdclvdlmmynkwsmg5tdc/post/3lmcw6dq6ji2x
Link to tweet
When NBC News’ Peter Alexander asked Bondi, “Should those individuals who followed the rules as they existed at the time be forced to leave the country now?” the nation’s chief law enforcement official replied, “Well, Peter, the rules at the time weren’t fair. The rules were dangerous to Americans.”.....
This approach is rooted in the idea that the United States is led, not by laws and institutions, but by a mercurial ruler who’ll tell us what’s true, until he changes his mind, at which point everyone will be expected to keep up.
At a congressional hearing yesterday, Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada asked a Trump nominee, “Why would any country want to do business with us, much less negotiate a trade deal, if we don’t even honor our ongoing agreements?”
The senator was referring to the White House’s trade tariffs, but it’s a question with broad applicability. The credibility of the United States is taking a beating, and thanks to Trump and his team, it's difficult to know when, or if, it will recover.