General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA 'disaster': Gretchen Whitmer's talk on tariffs and meeting with Trump anger fellow Democrats
The Michigan governor tried to play nice with Trump. Instead, there’s a sense in the party that she got played when the president used her as a bipartisan Oval Office prop. First, in a policy speech outlining a “consistent national strategy,” Whitmer staked out common ground with President Donald Trump. And though Whitmer criticized Trump’s sweeping, roller-coaster rollout of — and subsequent retreat from — tariffs, she said she was not against tariffs “outright” and expressed understanding of Trump’s “motivation” behind deploying them. That drew a social media rebuke from Colorado’s Democratic governor, Jared Polis.
“Tariffs are bad outright because they lead to higher prices and destroy American manufacturing,” Polis, another potential 2028 contender who has also sought ways to find common cause with Trump, wrote on X. “Trade is inherently good because both parties emerge better off from a consensual transaction.”
Then, later Wednesday, Whitmer joined Trump in the Oval Office. She was scheduled to meet privately with him and discuss Michigan issues. That wasn’t how it ultimately played out. Instead, she stood by as he signed several executive orders, including two calling for Justice Department probes of officials who served in his first administration and called him out for falsely claiming the 2020 election was stolen. He made the false claims about the election’s being “rigged” again Wednesday.
Whitmer was invited into the Oval Office alongside Michigan state House Speaker Matt Hall, a Republican, as Trump held court with reporters and signed the executive orders. Photos showed Whitmer standing uncomfortably against a door as the cameras rolled.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/disaster-gretchen-whitmers-talk-tariffs-meeting-trump-anger-fellow-dem-rcna200530

madaboutharry
(41,851 posts)I’m surprised that she even considered going to meet with him. What did she think would be accomplished?
SunSeeker
(55,493 posts)But I don't understand why she supports Trump's inane tariffs. They are deeply unpopular. https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3922 And knowledgeable economists agree that these tariffs will NOT bring back manufacturing to Michigan or anywhere else. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-tariffs-entice-companies-expand-us-manufacturing-economic/story?id=120635951
Response to SunSeeker (Original post)
Post removed
hatrack
(62,256 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 10, 2025, 07:54 AM - Edit history (1)
And btw, the last fucking thing I want to hear about right now is "bipartisanship".
It means one thing at the moment - surrender.
That's all it will ever mean until President Whiny Toddler is wheeled out of the West Wing on a gurney with a sheet over his face.
This isn't 1992, Governor. Get a fucking clue.
alarimer
(17,143 posts)Like Neville Chamberlain.
Tariffs are a tool and should be used judiciously. What Trump is doing is not that. Why is anybody sucking up to him?
BeyondGeography
(40,424 posts)They had no control of the agenda with Trump (oh, what a surprise) and if she had a good answer for what she would have done differently on tariffs, she wouldn’t have been there in the first place.
A national Democratic strategist said, “It is a massive indictment on Whitmer and her team’s judgment to, first, not have an answer on the tariff question and then go the White House and get absolutely played by Donald Trump to the point she is caught in the Oval Office as he signs one of his revenge and retribution executive orders and says 2020 was rigged.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/disaster-gretchen-whitmers-talk-tariffs-meeting-trump-anger-fellow-dem-rcna200530
Whitmer would have been one of my top choices had there been a primary in 2024 but I was mostly going on her ability to win in Michigan (admittedly no small thing) and her personality. When she started this pivot to “bipartisanship” right after the election I thought it was standard stuff, but it’s malpractice that she and her team did not update the playbook once the carnage started. If you’re a senior in Michigan worried about Social Security, how did yesterday feel? A government worker who is out of work, an individual who fears for himself and/or his family because of Stephen Miller’s deportation strategy, a teacher or a medical professional who is freaked out by what is happening with the DOE or HHS or just an average American appalled by who Trump is and what he has done to our country. None of it apparently mattered to Team Whitmer. She’s in the “bipartisan” lane and she’s sticking to it.
Yesterday was an exercise in empty-headed performative politics by Whitmer. It was a sad day for her and, given her stature, for the Democratic Party.
RJ-MacReady
(377 posts)Ok scratch her name from a possible 2028 run. What an absolute blunder. Srop trying to appease these people.
Vinca
(51,929 posts)Prairie Gates
(4,907 posts)Say what you want about Trump: he certainly knows how to degrade and humiliate people.
Wingus Dingus
(8,946 posts)Paladin
(30,211 posts)Passages
(2,634 posts)It is how they are used. Biden used them to protect Americans, not hurt them.
harumph
(2,662 posts)But the interaction with Trump was BADLY played. So BAD that it would give any Democrat pause when considering her for higher office. The Democratic party is infested with people who want to 'tack to the middle,' as if the 'middle' isn't some intangible
location where progressive or even modest left-of-center dreams go to die, but our MSM sells as bipartisanship.
Passages
(2,634 posts)run instead of hit back and confront.
Biden used tariffs, they were done well.
malaise
(283,219 posts)Do they ever learn?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gretchen_Whitmer_kidnapping_plot
newdeal2
(2,332 posts)By pardoning those criminals and telling the DOJ to pay them back for their trouble.
yorkster
(2,963 posts)the fact that she was in the damn OVAL OFFICE. How the hell did I miss that?
Geez Gretchen. Not schmart.
jalan48
(14,848 posts)pinkstarburst
(1,688 posts)Kid Berwyn
(20,038 posts)When she got off, Poof! No tariffs.
Then she read what the original script said.
NNadir
(35,623 posts)...this is not the time, as another poster noted in this thread to channel Neville Chamberlin.