Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Blue Flower

(6,319 posts)
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 10:44 AM 6 hrs ago

What researchers have discovered about maternal, infant health under Texas abortion ban

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-12-maternal-infant-health-texas-abortion.html

Here's what they have found
Outcomes worsened for women who experienced pregnancy loss and other serious complications in their pregnancies.

In October, a team of researchers published a study of more than 320,000 pregnancy losses in Texas health care facilities from January 2017 through September 2023. After Texas' near-total abortion ban went into effect in 2022, blood transfusions for women who lost their pregnancies were 15% higher than expected, based on historical trends.

In January 2025, researchers with UTHealth Houston presented research on previable premature rupture of membranes, when a woman's water breaks far too early in pregnancy. In such cases, the fetus rarely survives, while the mother is at risk of infection, bleeding and other serious complications.

The researchers studied outcomes in these patients before and after implementation of the Texas Heartbeat Act, which in September 2021 banned abortion in all but the earliest stages of pregnancy.


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What researchers have discovered about maternal, infant health under Texas abortion ban (Original Post) The Blue Flower 6 hrs ago OP
What we have learned is that men and the government need to stay out of women's healthcare. travelingthrulife 6 hrs ago #1
THIS NotHardly 6 hrs ago #2
You got that right 👍 MustLoveBeagles 5 hrs ago #3
And keep religion out of health care Jerry2144 5 hrs ago #4
Amen. (Excuse the pun) Through the ages, women have had to fight the bullshit in the Bible... chouchou 4 hrs ago #6
+++Totally THIS Diamond_Dog 5 hrs ago #5
Shared responsibility and authority Roy Rolling 2 hrs ago #7
. WhiskeyGrinder 2 hrs ago #8

Jerry2144

(3,169 posts)
4. And keep religion out of health care
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 11:09 AM
5 hrs ago

Number one cause of our problems is people misapplying their religion on others

chouchou

(2,762 posts)
6. Amen. (Excuse the pun) Through the ages, women have had to fight the bullshit in the Bible...
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 12:33 PM
4 hrs ago

...and the Bible bullshit in the men.

Roy Rolling

(7,409 posts)
7. Shared responsibility and authority
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 02:05 PM
2 hrs ago

Responsibility and authority go together always. When responsible for an outcome or event, authority must exist to make it happen. When given authority, the outcome is someone’s fault or benefit.

Making babies is a shared responsibility, leaving a woman to bear the responsibility alone without the authority to make decisions violates this principle of the universe.

And it should be a shared decision, unless the father is missing or a deadbeat. But the decision should be ranked within the context of a woman’s medical health, an infant’s health, and lastly, society’s benefit based on religion or similar metaphysical belief.

So who has the 20-year child responsibility for a full term birth? That person should have the authority to make her own medical decisions—right or wrong—and not based on someone else’s belief or faith.

This is not a green light to use abortion in place of birth control or common sense. That can be damaging to a woman also, as well as the risk of unwanted children—which can become a 20 year problem for missing/negligent parents and society.

WhiskeyGrinder

(26,216 posts)
8. .
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 02:09 PM
2 hrs ago
And it should be a shared decision, unless the father is missing or a deadbeat. But the decision should be ranked within the context of a woman’s medical health, an infant’s health, and lastly, society’s benefit based on religion or similar metaphysical belief.


lol no. The decision belongs to the person who carries the pregnancy.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What researchers have dis...