General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Did 435.98% of Voters Cast Ballots in Precinct 760, Northampton County, Pennsylvania?
Over the past year, weve documented corruption at every layer of the U.S. electoral systemfrom back-door de minimis updates to voting equipment¹ and fake ghost counties, to more than 1.5 million votes for Kamala Harris disappearing in real time on Election Night.² We found it, we documented it, and we sounded the alarmwhether anyone wanted to hear it or not.
Now, a growing number of independent journalists are arriving at the same conclusion, following the evidence to the same unavoidable place.
This is a 6,500-word article that can be summed up as follows: the GOP had motive, they had means, and they had opportunity. Every institution that could have stopped them chose to look the other wayor participatein stealing the 2024 election. The proof is here.
Christopher Armitage, The Existentialist Republic³
Yet even as more than 41% of Democrats believe the election was stolen, Hakeem Jeffries maintains that there are no election deniers on this side of the aisle.⁴ And now, Ken Martin has announced that the Democratic National Committee will not release its internal analysis of the 2024 presidential election.⁵
Snip
Donald Trump publicly thanked Elon Musk for his knowledge of those vote-counting computers in Pennsylvania²⁵and state attorneys general didnt bat an eye:
Trump, So, thank you to Elon.
https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/how-did-43598-of-voters-cast-ballots
********
These are real facts and real #s. Not kooky extremist ideas.
Baitball Blogger
(51,832 posts)SheltieLover
(77,662 posts)Emile
(41,012 posts)Botany
(76,564 posts)Presidential vote like in North Carolina, voting blocks like the right for women to choose what to do
with their bodies that had won just about every election post the overturning of Roe v Wade disappeared, during the 2024 election, Trumps train wreck of a campaign, Harris and Walzs huge turn outs @ campaign
events, bomb threats to polling places, the lies about school kids getting trans operations, hanging chad,
SCOTUS ruling, the price of eggs lies, and so on always has favored republicans.
If there was no manipulation of the vote then a simple bell shaped curve would show events on both
sides but that never happens.
LIBERAL MEDIA
barbtries
(31,178 posts)here in NC Democrats won almost all the down ballot races.
but I just felt, and still do, that I don't get any mileage from dwelling on it. I need to address the actual conditions on the ground right now.
I am glad that people are doing this research and fervently hope that one day, there will be justice.
PS in my book gw lost twice. so there's that. I am not a kook.
Scrivener7
(58,614 posts)Native
(7,314 posts)Combined Precinct Data: For the 2024 general election, Northampton County combined "Lower Mt. Bethel D Lower" (Precinct 760) and "Lower Mt. Bethel D Independent" for tabulation purposes.
Voter Registration Mismatch: The Pennsylvania state reporting file listed only 164 registered voters for Precinct 760 specifically. However, the actual vote count of 715 for that location included voters from both the "Lower" and "Independent" districts (which had 739 registered voters of its own).
The Calculation Error: Dividing the combined total of 715 votes by only the 164 registered voters assigned to the "Lower" sub-precinct in the state file created the mathematically impossible percentage of 435.98%.
Official Confirmation: While unofficial election night reporting by private vendors sometimes contains these clerical data-mapping errors, official county records reflect a normal turnout percentage when both combined registration totals are accounted for.
Northampton County has experienced other clerical issues in the past, such as a 2023 human error where judicial retention race names were flipped on printed paper ballots, though the machine barcodes recorded the votes correctly.
Botany
(76,564 posts)Native
(7,314 posts)KS Toronado
(23,244 posts)edhopper
(37,139 posts)which looks high. How were the votes compared to past elections.
How does this compare to 2020?
malaise
(293,565 posts)Very important
Mystery To Me
(36 posts)47% to 44% lead In Iowa. Trump won the state by 13.2 points. In times past, a discrepancy like that would have been highly suspect.
Kaleva
(40,256 posts)KS Toronado
(23,244 posts)
Kaleva
(40,256 posts)Of which 715 voted, indicating a normal voter turnout.
Precinct 760 covers Lower Mt. Bethel Township.
EdmondDantes_
(1,445 posts)The substack certainly doesn't link to where they got their data from
Botany
(76,564 posts)These are serious people from I.T., computer sciences, engineering, and statistical services.
EdmondDantes_
(1,445 posts)Every time I've looked up the numbers they've claimed in the past, they lied. I see no reason to doubt they've done so again, but it would be nice to have the link handy.
And now that the link to the official numbers has been provided, we know with certainty that the ETA and the substack are lying to us again.
Kaleva
(40,256 posts)Precinct 760 consists of LOWER MT. BETHEL TWSP LOWER.
biocube
(182 posts)Have any more reputable media outlets picked this up?
If there was anything to go on, I feel confident state level Democratic parties would sue.
NJCher
(42,615 posts)When they refuse to release their 2024 report.
When they vote to substantially fund ice after one, now two murders.
Lonestarblue
(13,280 posts)They all act as though the elections will be fair and there is nothing to worry about. The fact that the Dominion voting machine company is now owed by one of Trumps buddies should at least cause some extra checks of the programming in those machines. If theres a way to cheat, Republicans will use it.
Javaman
(65,264 posts)It was fixed via Elons tabulation software.
Why do you think he and the orange asshole are buddy buddy again?
And why has Elon been so quiet lately, hmmmm?
waterwatcher123
(482 posts)If you have a few moments, consider writing Joe Rogan's show to ask him to invite Elon Musk to the program to explain how he knew the 2024 presidential election results four hours in advance. No secretary of state would have allowed a citizen access to voter data four hours before the polls closed. In fact, many of these precincts and voting districts would not have posted data until after 8:00 p.m. when the polls closed in the east (even later in different time zones). So, what explanation is there other than Elon had some piece of software installed on machines or tabulators that either manipulated the data or provided information in advance of any official data releases? Elon spent 270 million dollars to elect Trump. No one invests that kind of money without a clear path to the ROI.
Just to be clear too. I am sure Elon would not disclose to anyone how his app worked or whether he engaged in election theft. However, these people have such big egos that they can hardly restrain themselves from talking about their technological prowess.
Here is the link to Joe Rogan website form if you care to write (https://www.joeroganexperiencereview.com/contact).
This is what I said to him writing the first time (of course, there was no response). I probably should not have mentioned that I am not a fan of the show.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
I am not a fan of your show. However, I did see a clip during the 2024 presidential election where Mr. Rogan mentioned that Elon Musk knew about the presidential election results up to four hours ahead of everyone else. Later, Musk's son (X) all but admitted (hard for a small child to keep secrets) that Elon and his crew had tampered with the election.
I do not want to live in a country controlled by a megalomaniac who is constantly under the influence of ketamine. As such, I think it would be very interesting and timely to consider inviting Elon on your show to see if he will explain what he did with the election besides spend tons of money. I suspect he used his 650 direct to cell satellites to wake up and download an algorithm on ES&S and Dominion voting machines. However, no one can say for sure since the American public is so fickle that voting behavior swings widely from election to election.
I would guess your audience would like to know that someone is not choosing their elected leaders via electronic manipulation. Trump ran an anemic campaign in 2024. Yet, he someone managed to win all the swing states and flip counties that had never voted Republican. Not a single red county flipped the other way. This is very strange behavior that cannot be explained by the strength of his campaign or advertising (people generally do not switch parties that easily).
The Republican party has been perfecting election theft since they staged the fake outrage in Miami-Dade County, Florida in 2000 with operatives. The Democrats probably stole elections prior to that time with on-the-ground efforts in Chicago (Nixon accused Kennedy of such an effort). Either way, we need to know if someone is tampering with our election results (even foreign countries). Elon Musk has the technical capability to do it nationwide with his satellite network. It would be nice for you to ask him point blank about how he knew early results and whether his network connected with any of these voting machines as they were in sleep mode in voting locations (plugged in, but not active).
There are plenty of ways operatives can influence elections. However, someone who tampers with electronic results controls the outcome in a very predictable and inexpensive way. None of us want to live in a world where nothing we do or say makes any difference.
Please consider this as a show or podcast idea.
DFW
(59,799 posts)Ohio in 2004 was the Florida of 2000. 2004 was the first year in which electronic voting machines were first widely used in a presidential election. Diebold vote counting machines were made in Ohio. Its CEO declared he would "deliver Ohio for Bush." Ohio's Secretary of State was also the Ohio chairman of the Bush re-election committee. Exit polls indicated that Kerry had won Ohio. Although Bush's win was a "surprise upset," Diebold went to court to get their vote counting machines designated "private property," and thus ineligible for forensic examination to make sure their reported results were accurate. However ONE of their machines, way out in some rural precinct DID get forensically examined before its owners came to collect it. This was a precinct with 600 registered voters. The machine reported 3000 votes for Bush. The machine's makers declared that it was just a "glitch" that by no means warranted forensic examination of the other machines. The Republicans did magnanimously reduce the margin of victory in Ohio by 2400 votes, though.
Forget Republican claims of "anti-kommanism." They are the consummate Stalinists ("Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" ). правду сказать, товарищи!!
Ford_Prefect
(8,522 posts)No shit. It's what they do .... And they Absolutely did do it!