Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Botany

(76,564 posts)
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 08:03 AM 2 hrs ago

How Did 435.98% of Voters Cast Ballots in Precinct 760, Northampton County, Pennsylvania?

Over the past year, we’ve documented corruption at every layer of the U.S. electoral system—from back-door “de minimis” updates to voting equipment¹ and fake “ghost counties,” to more than 1.5 million votes for Kamala Harris disappearing in real time on Election Night.² We found it, we documented it, and we sounded the alarm—whether anyone wanted to hear it or not.

Now, a growing number of independent journalists are arriving at the same conclusion, following the evidence to the same unavoidable place.

“This is a 6,500-word article that can be summed up as follows: the GOP had motive, they had means, and they had opportunity. Every institution that could have stopped them chose to look the other way—or participate—in stealing the 2024 election. The proof is here.”
— Christopher Armitage, The Existentialist Republic³

Yet even as more than 41% of Democrats believe the election was stolen, Hakeem Jeffries maintains that there are “no election deniers” on this side of the aisle.⁴ And now, Ken Martin has announced that the Democratic National Committee will not release its internal analysis of the 2024 presidential election.⁵

Snip

Donald Trump publicly thanked Elon Musk for his knowledge of “those vote-counting computers” in Pennsylvania²⁵—and state attorneys general didn’t bat an eye:

Trump, “So, thank you to Elon.”

https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/how-did-43598-of-voters-cast-ballots

********

These are real facts and real #s. Not kooky extremist ideas.





28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Did 435.98% of Voters Cast Ballots in Precinct 760, Northampton County, Pennsylvania? (Original Post) Botany 2 hrs ago OP
kick Baitball Blogger 1 hr ago #1
Ask fleaon. SheltieLover 1 hr ago #2
There's no way that pos won every battleground state. Emile 1 hr ago #3
Funny how every anomaly, voter suppression move, people voting for Ds down ticket but skipping the Botany 1 hr ago #5
i've been skeptical all along. barbtries 3 min ago #28
Kick. Scrivener7 1 hr ago #4
Google AI's response to your question... Native 1 hr ago #6
So what about all the other counties in PA that had precincts with huge over votes? Botany 1 hr ago #8
I'm not saying I don't think there was fraud, which is what I think you might be implying. Native 1 hr ago #10
Sounds like right wing talking points KS Toronado 45 min ago #20
That is still over an 80% turn out edhopper 34 min ago #26
K & R malaise 1 hr ago #7
Pre election polling showed Kamala with Mystery To Me 1 hr ago #9
Wasn't that just one poll? Kaleva 1 hr ago #12
Welcome to DU ! KS Toronado 41 min ago #22
I see that precinct 760 had 903 registered voters in 2024 Kaleva 1 hr ago #11
Can you share the link? EdmondDantes_ 1 hr ago #13
Election Truth Alliance is one of the sources. Botany 1 hr ago #15
That's a complete avoidance of the fact that Election Truth Alliance doesn't cite their source EdmondDantes_ 39 min ago #24
Page 366 Kaleva 40 min ago #23
Substack article that cites other substack articles biocube 1 hr ago #14
Yeah, right NJCher 52 min ago #18
I believe Republicans cheated in 2024, but I want Democratic officials to wake up to the their 2026 plans. Lonestarblue 57 min ago #16
Because as everyone knows but no one will say it out loud Javaman 54 min ago #17
I have written Joe Rogan about Elon's supposed app that gave him the election results four hours before anyone else. waterwatcher123 48 min ago #19
This is how Cheneybush "won" "re-election" in 2004 DFW 43 min ago #21
Just ask Elmo, the DOGE Trolls, and Ellison. They know because they built the tools to do it. Ford_Prefect 35 min ago #25
It's vitally important that the illusion that our votes decide how we live be maintained. Autumn 20 min ago #27

Botany

(76,564 posts)
5. Funny how every anomaly, voter suppression move, people voting for Ds down ticket but skipping the
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 08:36 AM
1 hr ago

Presidential vote like in North Carolina, voting blocks like the right for women to choose what to do
with their bodies that had won just about every election post the overturning of Roe v Wade disappeared, during the 2024 election, Trump’s train wreck of a campaign, Harris and Walz’s huge turn outs @ campaign
events, bomb threats to polling places, the lies about school kids getting trans operations, hanging chad,
SCOTUS ruling, the price of eggs lies, and so on always has favored republicans.

If there was no manipulation of the vote then a simple bell shaped curve would show “events on both
sides” but that never happens.

LIBERAL MEDIA

barbtries

(31,178 posts)
28. i've been skeptical all along.
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 10:04 AM
3 min ago

here in NC Democrats won almost all the down ballot races.

but I just felt, and still do, that I don't get any mileage from dwelling on it. I need to address the actual conditions on the ground right now.

I am glad that people are doing this research and fervently hope that one day, there will be justice.

PS in my book gw lost twice. so there's that. I am not a kook.

Native

(7,314 posts)
6. Google AI's response to your question...
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 08:41 AM
1 hr ago
The reported turnout of 435.98% in Precinct 760 (Lower Mt. Bethel Township, Lower District) during the 2024 election was an artifact of how state and county systems handled a combined precinct.
Combined Precinct Data: For the 2024 general election, Northampton County combined "Lower Mt. Bethel D Lower" (Precinct 760) and "Lower Mt. Bethel D Independent" for tabulation purposes.
Voter Registration Mismatch: The Pennsylvania state reporting file listed only 164 registered voters for Precinct 760 specifically. However, the actual vote count of 715 for that location included voters from both the "Lower" and "Independent" districts (which had 739 registered voters of its own).
The Calculation Error: Dividing the combined total of 715 votes by only the 164 registered voters assigned to the "Lower" sub-precinct in the state file created the mathematically impossible percentage of 435.98%.
Official Confirmation: While unofficial election night reporting by private vendors sometimes contains these clerical data-mapping errors, official county records reflect a normal turnout percentage when both combined registration totals are accounted for.
Northampton County has experienced other clerical issues in the past, such as a 2023 human error where judicial retention race names were flipped on printed paper ballots, though the machine barcodes recorded the votes correctly.

Native

(7,314 posts)
10. I'm not saying I don't think there was fraud, which is what I think you might be implying.
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 08:55 AM
1 hr ago

edhopper

(37,139 posts)
26. That is still over an 80% turn out
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:33 AM
34 min ago

which looks high. How were the votes compared to past elections.
How does this compare to 2020?

Mystery To Me

(36 posts)
9. Pre election polling showed Kamala with
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 08:54 AM
1 hr ago

47% to 44% lead In Iowa. Trump won the state by 13.2 points. In times past, a discrepancy like that would have been highly suspect.

Kaleva

(40,256 posts)
11. I see that precinct 760 had 903 registered voters in 2024
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 08:57 AM
1 hr ago

Of which 715 voted, indicating a normal voter turnout.

Precinct 760 covers Lower Mt. Bethel Township.

EdmondDantes_

(1,445 posts)
13. Can you share the link?
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 08:59 AM
1 hr ago

The substack certainly doesn't link to where they got their data from

Botany

(76,564 posts)
15. Election Truth Alliance is one of the sources.
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:06 AM
1 hr ago

These are serious people from I.T., computer sciences, engineering, and statistical services.

EdmondDantes_

(1,445 posts)
24. That's a complete avoidance of the fact that Election Truth Alliance doesn't cite their source
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:28 AM
39 min ago

Every time I've looked up the numbers they've claimed in the past, they lied. I see no reason to doubt they've done so again, but it would be nice to have the link handy.

And now that the link to the official numbers has been provided, we know with certainty that the ETA and the substack are lying to us again.

biocube

(182 posts)
14. Substack article that cites other substack articles
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:04 AM
1 hr ago

Have any more reputable media outlets picked this up?

If there was anything to go on, I feel confident state level Democratic parties would sue.

NJCher

(42,615 posts)
18. Yeah, right
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:15 AM
52 min ago
I feel confident state level Democratic parties would sue.

When they refuse to release their 2024 report.

When they vote to substantially fund ice after one, now two murders.

Lonestarblue

(13,280 posts)
16. I believe Republicans cheated in 2024, but I want Democratic officials to wake up to the their 2026 plans.
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:10 AM
57 min ago

They all act as though the elections will be fair and there is nothing to worry about. The fact that the Dominion voting machine company is now owed by one of Trump’s buddies should at least cause some extra checks of the programming in those machines. If there’s a way to cheat, Republicans will use it.

Javaman

(65,264 posts)
17. Because as everyone knows but no one will say it out loud
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:13 AM
54 min ago

It was fixed via Elon’s tabulation software.

Why do you think he and the orange asshole are buddy buddy again?

And why has Elon been so quiet lately, hmmmm?

waterwatcher123

(482 posts)
19. I have written Joe Rogan about Elon's supposed app that gave him the election results four hours before anyone else.
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:19 AM
48 min ago

If you have a few moments, consider writing Joe Rogan's show to ask him to invite Elon Musk to the program to explain how he knew the 2024 presidential election results four hours in advance. No secretary of state would have allowed a citizen access to voter data four hours before the polls closed. In fact, many of these precincts and voting districts would not have posted data until after 8:00 p.m. when the polls closed in the east (even later in different time zones). So, what explanation is there other than Elon had some piece of software installed on machines or tabulators that either manipulated the data or provided information in advance of any official data releases? Elon spent 270 million dollars to elect Trump. No one invests that kind of money without a clear path to the ROI.

Just to be clear too. I am sure Elon would not disclose to anyone how his app worked or whether he engaged in election theft. However, these people have such big egos that they can hardly restrain themselves from talking about their technological prowess.

Here is the link to Joe Rogan website form if you care to write (https://www.joeroganexperiencereview.com/contact).

This is what I said to him writing the first time (of course, there was no response). I probably should not have mentioned that I am not a fan of the show.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello,

I am not a fan of your show. However, I did see a clip during the 2024 presidential election where Mr. Rogan mentioned that Elon Musk knew about the presidential election results up to four hours ahead of everyone else. Later, Musk's son (X) all but admitted (hard for a small child to keep secrets) that Elon and his crew had tampered with the election.

I do not want to live in a country controlled by a megalomaniac who is constantly under the influence of ketamine. As such, I think it would be very interesting and timely to consider inviting Elon on your show to see if he will explain what he did with the election besides spend tons of money. I suspect he used his 650 direct to cell satellites to wake up and download an algorithm on ES&S and Dominion voting machines. However, no one can say for sure since the American public is so fickle that voting behavior swings widely from election to election.

I would guess your audience would like to know that someone is not choosing their elected leaders via electronic manipulation. Trump ran an anemic campaign in 2024. Yet, he someone managed to win all the swing states and flip counties that had never voted Republican. Not a single red county flipped the other way. This is very strange behavior that cannot be explained by the strength of his campaign or advertising (people generally do not switch parties that easily).

The Republican party has been perfecting election theft since they staged the fake outrage in Miami-Dade County, Florida in 2000 with operatives. The Democrats probably stole elections prior to that time with on-the-ground efforts in Chicago (Nixon accused Kennedy of such an effort). Either way, we need to know if someone is tampering with our election results (even foreign countries). Elon Musk has the technical capability to do it nationwide with his satellite network. It would be nice for you to ask him point blank about how he knew early results and whether his network connected with any of these voting machines as they were in sleep mode in voting locations (plugged in, but not active).

There are plenty of ways operatives can influence elections. However, someone who tampers with electronic results controls the outcome in a very predictable and inexpensive way. None of us want to live in a world where nothing we do or say makes any difference.

Please consider this as a show or podcast idea.

DFW

(59,799 posts)
21. This is how Cheneybush "won" "re-election" in 2004
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:24 AM
43 min ago

Ohio in 2004 was the Florida of 2000. 2004 was the first year in which electronic voting machines were first widely used in a presidential election. Diebold vote counting machines were made in Ohio. Its CEO declared he would "deliver Ohio for Bush." Ohio's Secretary of State was also the Ohio chairman of the Bush re-election committee. Exit polls indicated that Kerry had won Ohio. Although Bush's win was a "surprise upset," Diebold went to court to get their vote counting machines designated "private property," and thus ineligible for forensic examination to make sure their reported results were accurate. However ONE of their machines, way out in some rural precinct DID get forensically examined before its owners came to collect it. This was a precinct with 600 registered voters. The machine reported 3000 votes for Bush. The machine's makers declared that it was just a "glitch" that by no means warranted forensic examination of the other machines. The Republicans did magnanimously reduce the margin of victory in Ohio by 2400 votes, though.

Forget Republican claims of "anti-kommanism." They are the consummate Stalinists ("Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" ). правду сказать, товарищи!!

Ford_Prefect

(8,522 posts)
25. Just ask Elmo, the DOGE Trolls, and Ellison. They know because they built the tools to do it.
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:32 AM
35 min ago

No shit. It's what they do .... And they Absolutely did do it!

Autumn

(48,826 posts)
27. It's vitally important that the illusion that our votes decide how we live be maintained.
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 09:47 AM
20 min ago
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Did 435.98% of Voters...