Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mr.Bee

(1,766 posts)
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 01:34 AM Yesterday

Did trump's Racism Just Hand The MidTerms To The Democrats?

While all the Republicans in the room applauded his blatant racism against 'illegal aliens', immigrants,
his advocacy for religion, lies, abolishing personal freedoms, having to present papers in order to vote,
isn't this a bridge too far for most Americans?
It was all there in full display.

It is not immigrants or people of color that have stolen your jobs, your wealth,
it's CEOs, billionaires, and people like Darn Old J. Trump.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did trump's Racism Just Hand The MidTerms To The Democrats? (Original Post) Mr.Bee Yesterday OP
Of course not. We would not be in this position if that was how most Americans reacted to such. RockRaven Yesterday #1
Immigration was a key point that swung the election. Melon Yesterday #2
Don't be so sure... WarGamer Yesterday #3
Do they realize that most of the voter fraud is not really a thing? HeartsCanHope Yesterday #4
If its not told by the media slightlv Yesterday #5
You're right, of course. HeartsCanHope 21 hrs ago #8
You're not the only one, Hearts! slightlv 7 hrs ago #20
In practice, there is no need for anti-fraud legislation re voting WarGamer 6 hrs ago #22
That Gallup poll does NOT address the draconian requirements of the SAVE Act. SunSeeker Yesterday #6
Do you mean "disenfranchisement" bill? harumph 19 hrs ago #14
Yes. nt SunSeeker 16 hrs ago #17
I support voter ID requirements, as do most Democrats. W_HAMILTON 20 hrs ago #10
We used to use signatures Bettie 19 hrs ago #13
November will tell the tale. Boomerproud 23 hrs ago #7
the speech won't change anything and Dems already had the midterms in hand from the general awful mess LymphocyteLover 20 hrs ago #9
Yup, to quote Bill Clinton... GoCubsGo 20 hrs ago #11
I didn't hear him say anything about the economy Mr.Bee 19 hrs ago #15
he's fucking delusional (among many other problems) LymphocyteLover 10 hrs ago #18
No RB77 19 hrs ago #12
To me, IT WAS SHOCKING Mr.Bee 19 hrs ago #16
To me, PAR FOR THE COURSE B.See 10 hrs ago #19
Nope Jose Garcia 7 hrs ago #21

RockRaven

(19,037 posts)
1. Of course not. We would not be in this position if that was how most Americans reacted to such.
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 01:42 AM
Yesterday

Melon

(1,282 posts)
2. Immigration was a key point that swung the election.
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 01:55 AM
Yesterday

I doubt that the populace has all swung back. They literally voted for what’s happening.

HeartsCanHope

(1,606 posts)
4. Do they realize that most of the voter fraud is not really a thing?
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 03:57 AM
Yesterday

I think most of the voter fraud actually favors Republicans, so you think they'd keep quiet about it!

https://www.ms.now/opinion/msnbc-opinion/republicans-voter-fraud-convictions-2024-rcna146434

This data was from 2024. Seems a weird thing to point out when their own Heritage Foundation data shows

it's not really an issue. https://electionfraud.heritage.org/

I know it's just a way of making it harder for minorities to vote. But if you are the party committing MORE voter

fraud, it seems odd to have the data out there for people to find. Just saying!

slightlv

(7,648 posts)
5. If its not told by the media
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 04:05 AM
Yesterday

If none of the old media headlines it. How does word get out. Put it on SM and the thousands of bots bath and ridicule it.

Besides people willing spend 20 to 40 minutes finding out what kind of tree or potato they are... but they wint take the time to do real research!

HeartsCanHope

(1,606 posts)
8. You're right, of course.
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 07:23 AM
21 hrs ago

I forget that we're in the wild, wild west as far as bots and SM. I'm an old-timer. Grew up before any of this was a thing.

Thanks for helping me.

slightlv

(7,648 posts)
20. You're not the only one, Hearts!
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 09:07 PM
7 hrs ago

I came of career age during Wangs. Bot Farms were a total new one on me only a few years ago. But with the spread and addictive character of Social Media, we're going to have to get a handle on all of it before too much longer. When we take back our government, we may find, like some European nations, that there are certain limits to free speech that will need to be enacted. That will hurt a lot, for what we grew up understanding... but hate speech and speech disseminated by non-humans only for the aristocracy has to be nipped in the bud at some point. It's not a popular opinion, I know. And I hope there are several ways of achieving it without too much restriction. But our Constitution is sorely out of date in today's AI world.

WarGamer

(18,392 posts)
22. In practice, there is no need for anti-fraud legislation re voting
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 10:05 PM
6 hrs ago

As you said, it just doesn't exist.

Having said that... it polls well, in a bipartisan way.

SunSeeker

(58,098 posts)
6. That Gallup poll does NOT address the draconian requirements of the SAVE Act.
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 04:24 AM
Yesterday

That poll merely found 84% support requiring simple photo identification to vote and 83% support providing proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time.

The SAVE Act would require everyone to show up with proof of citizenship every time they voted, something that most photo IDs do not provide. That would disenfranchise millions of voters. The House version of the bill would to replace that requirement with a directive that states regularly submit their voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security, as well as a restrictive photo ID requirement for voting. That would still disenfranchise millions of voters, especially women and the poor. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-save-act-bills-would-still-block-millions-americans-voting

Key provisions of the SAVE Act:

●The bill not only requires proof of citizenship, but also proof of residence in order to register. This could block even more Americans from voting. Roughly 9 percent of the population has moved within a state in the past year, but many will not update their driver’s licenses until they expire.

●The bill would require photo ID to vote, providing a narrow list of acceptable IDs more restrictive than the voter ID laws in every state but Ohio. For example, the bill prohibits the use of student IDs (even those issued by state universities), and accepts tribal IDs only with an expiration date, even though many tribal IDs do not contain them.

●The legislation would mandate voter roll purges every 30 days, placing enormous burdens on election officials and ending the 90-day quiet period that protects voters from being mistakenly thrown off the rolls right before Election Day.

●The bill would prohibit universal mail voting, requiring all mail voters to submit an application in order to receive a mail ballot. This would end the longstanding principal method of voting in eight states and Washington, DC.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-save-act-bills-would-still-block-millions-americans-voting

Those SAVE Act provisions fly in the face of what Americans want, according to the Gallop poll you cite, which found that 60% favor automatic voter registration, whereby citizens are registered when they do business with state agencies such as the Department of Motor Vehicles, and sending absentee ballot applications to all eligible voters. 64% of Americans oppose removing people from voter registration lists if they haven’t voted in any elections in five years and 58% oppose limiting the number of drop boxes or locations for returning absentee ballots.

The SAVE Act is not a "voter ID" bill, it is a voter disenfranchisement bill.

W_HAMILTON

(10,273 posts)
10. I support voter ID requirements, as do most Democrats.
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 07:31 AM
20 hrs ago

The issue is the type of voter ID required.

We Democrats are in favor of the types of ID that were sufficient for decades and resulted in no level of voter fraud even worth discussing.

Republicans want to enforce ever-increasing levels of voter ID, not to prevent already essentially non-existent voter fraud, but because they want to make it more difficult to vote because they know they are getting VOTED THE FUCK OUT the next chance we, the voters, get to vote.

Boomerproud

(9,243 posts)
7. November will tell the tale.
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 05:14 AM
23 hrs ago

Last edited Wed Feb 25, 2026, 06:51 AM - Edit history (1)

He won twice being who he is.

LymphocyteLover

(9,674 posts)
9. the speech won't change anything and Dems already had the midterms in hand from the general awful mess
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 07:29 AM
20 hrs ago

the GOP has made of things

GoCubsGo

(34,836 posts)
11. Yup, to quote Bill Clinton...
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 07:49 AM
20 hrs ago

It's the economy, stupid. And, the Trump-Epstein cover-up. The looting of our Treasury. And,...

Mr.Bee

(1,766 posts)
15. I didn't hear him say anything about the economy
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 09:09 AM
19 hrs ago

he hasn't already said for weeks, same delusional lies about how great it is,
That is the state of our union?
An episode of FoxNews.

RB77

(76 posts)
12. No
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 08:30 AM
19 hrs ago

He’s already been elected twice. The fact that he’s a racist isn’t a newly revealed secret. If we’re going to win the midterms we need to focus on Democracy and economy. We’ve had a better economy under Democratic administrations since the 80’s and it seems that most voters don’t realize this. Just my opinion these days. 🤓

Mr.Bee

(1,766 posts)
16. To me, IT WAS SHOCKING
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 09:15 AM
19 hrs ago

I haven't heard anyone come out so blatantly racist in years, and on national TV.
He is completely wrong about the Somalis, it was a WHITE woman, Aimee Bock.
And revealing he plans to invade and attack other blue states?
The man is an enemy of ALL people.

B.See

(8,174 posts)
19. To me, PAR FOR THE COURSE
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 06:07 PM
10 hrs ago

from the psychopath who said of Latino immigrants, they're bringing their drugs, they're criminals and rapists, who calls Black mayors and journalists low IQ, who speaks of shithole countries, posts the Obamas as apes, and who in a national debate for the land's highest office, said Haitians were 'eating the cats and the dogs.' Black history and monuments being removed, erased while he restores the names of rebel insurrectionists.

But not to worry cause there'll still be sellout clowns like Donalds, Scott, et al, eager to lend (a) black-face to Trump's racism and bigotry.

(a Stephen in every plot)

Jose Garcia

(3,469 posts)
21. Nope
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 09:24 PM
7 hrs ago

Few people will remember the speech in November.

The House is already lost for the GOP. Trump's unpopularity has already sealed that fate. The only question is whether or not they lose the Senate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did trump's Racism Just H...