General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJasmine Crockett Holds Big Lead in Texas Primary (& Abbot spends millions to fight her).
Last edited Wed Feb 25, 2026, 03:43 PM - Edit history (1)
Jasmine Crockett Holds Big Lead in Texas Primary
February 25, 2026 at 10:56 am EST By Taegan Goddard 263 Comments
https://politicalwire.com/2026/02/25/jasmine-crockett-holds-big-lead-in-texas-primary/
A new University of Texas poll finds Jasmine Crockett (D) with a big lead James Talarico (D) in the Democratic U.S. Senate primary, 56% to 44%.
On the Republican side, Ken Paxton and Sen. John Cornyn running neck-and-neck, with neither candidate close to the 50%-plus-one-vote threshold needed to avoid a runoff.
Paxton led with 36% to Cornyns 34%. Rep. Wesley Hunt was in third, garnering 26% of the vote.
And:
Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas is spending millions of dollars on attack ads targeting Representative Jasmine Crockett, one of two Democratic candidates for Senate, and other prominent Democrats.
— The New York Times (@nytimes.com) 2026-02-25T20:40:06.032984Z
Bread and Circuses
(1,801 posts)Big Blue Marble
(5,676 posts)James Talarico would have a better chance in the general in Texas which
has proven time after time to be a hard nut to crack.
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,914 posts)I voted for Talarico but would be happy to support Crockett. The primary turnout numbers have been encouraging with far more democrats voting so far in the early vote. As of yesterday, the Democrats had far higher turnover than was normal in the primary.
Link to tweet
🟦 DEM: 754,765 (+116,683)
🟥 GOP: 642,681 (+99,738)
Dems: 120.7% of 2022 total
Reps: 62.7% of 2022 total
The people showing up so far in the GOP primary are older
Link to tweet
41% are age 70 or older.
85% are age 50 or older.

Skittles
(170,609 posts)sucks
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,914 posts)Her congressional district was destroyed by this gerrymander. The same thing was done to Al Green who is now in a primary for a different congressional district (CD 18). CD 18 used to be Sheila Jackson Lee's district and was vacant for almost a year when Sylvester Turned died. My oldest was in CD 18 but was moved to another district as a result of the gerrymander for the 2026 election cycle. Al Green is now in a tough primary against Christian Menefee who was just elected to replace Turner. I have heard that Menefee is ahead according to a poll, but Green has been around for a long time.
I personally like Al Green and spoke at an election event he hosted. Green introduced me to both Hillary Clinton and John Lewis as his attorney because I have worked on some voter protection efforts with him and other.
Texas politics are strange right now. I voted for Talarico but would be glad to support Crockett.
Skittles
(170,609 posts)is not an excuse to fuck with Talarico.....of course I'll be voting for Crockett if she wins but I still think she should not have joined this race
JustAnotherGen
(37,892 posts)When should she run it?
Men have no problem throwing an elbow at a woman to get ahead. I've worked too long in Corporate America and yes - local and state politics as well to not know that is a FACT.
She saw an opportunity.
She took it.
It's the American way. All she is doing is giving the good old boys network a quick shove out of her way.
I applaud it.
Rstrstx
(1,645 posts)She cant stand Greg Abbott and Id love to see her go toe to toe with him. Theyre the ones that gerrymandered out her seat.
But yeah, getting into the Senate race at the very last moment was kind of a turnoff for me too. I like her but if she wins the Democratic primary its just going to be that much harder to win in November. Not impossible if Paxton is the nominee, but well have to put up some massive new voter registration numbers, like bigger than Betos in 2018.
Im not surprised that she is leading, I went to a local candidate meet and greet down here in S Texas last week and there were more people taking home Crockett yard signs than Talarico ones. Not by a huge margin but I was impressed with how many were getting snapped up. I think many Dems want a fighter right now and shes about the biggest one in the state.
Horse with no Name
(34,228 posts)Are crossing into the primary to boost Crockett because they are afraid of Talarico. I wouldnt mind either of them but my guess is that shenanigans are afoot.
Quiet Em
(2,726 posts)They have their own battle going on between Paxton and Cornyn.
I don't know who will win the Democratic Primary, although Crockett is probably favored at this point, but whoever wins it will be due to Democratic voters, not Republicans.
pinkstarburst
(1,956 posts)Look at the numbers. If they gave a sht about Cornyn vs Paxton, their numbers would be what ours are. Their numbers would be HIGHER since there are more republicans in the state! Our numbers are wiping their numbers out because they are crossing over to vote in our primary. They know perfectly well that if Talarico wins, we could flip that seat. If Jasmine wins, they've won. I'm literally sick looking at that data. We have no chance if she's the one who advances.
Quiet Em
(2,726 posts)and if Crockett does win, as many are projecting, the attacks on her stop.
pinkstarburst
(1,956 posts)and by entering the race at the last second against a strong candidate who genuinely could win, she has potentially ruined any chance Texas has at that seat. Crockett should have stuck to her House seat. If her argument was that she couldn't win her House seat because it got gerrymandered then she has zero business running for a statewide race in Texas because no way can she win in ruby red Texas where she will have to pick up conservative votes, if she can't even win in her own House district.
Quiet Em
(2,726 posts)There are other States that are much more likely and much more easier for Democrats to flip. But there is something happening there and it is showing up in the enthusiasm and early voting numbers in the primary. Longshot as it may be, I always stay cautiously optimistic and I believe there is a chance to take that seat with Crockett or Talarico as the candidate. Texas Democrats will decide which candidate they will be sending.
pinkstarburst
(1,956 posts)crossover. No way do I believe that is all "democratic enthusiasm" because the dem numbers are so much higher than republican early vote numbers when there are more republicans in the state.
Quiet Em
(2,726 posts)People who aren't consistent voters and people who are apolitical.
But Republican voters are fighting their own battle between Paxton and Cornyn.
Low turnout on the Republican side with this internal battle happening is a good sign for Democrats and does show that the enthusiasm is leaning towards the Democratic ticket.
Nictuku
(4,618 posts)I also think that congress needs people like Talrico. Perhaps he can run for the seat Crockett vacates. This guy can talk sense into some of these evangelical independents.
pinkstarburst
(1,956 posts)And the republicans know it. This is why they are crossing over to vote for her in the democratic primary right now.
JustAnotherGen
(37,892 posts)Can't reach the past 5-10 year of non-voters or Black voters. I also find it interesting the Latino voters showing up at her rallys.
The wins in 2026 are going to be energizing non-voters who see what a shit ass country we are.
DFW
(59,991 posts)I would want to hear from many more of them before judging a poll to be accurate.
Quiet Em
(2,726 posts)There was another poll a week or so ago. Very similar results. On March 3rd we will have difinitive results.
DFW
(59,991 posts)I know I was denied the chance to cast my primary vote. I'm just one voter, but I doubt I was the only one.
Quiet Em
(2,726 posts)I never miss a vote. I would be livid if that happened to me.
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,914 posts)The GOP is targeting overseas voters in the SAVE Act.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1009921
SSJVegeta
(2,613 posts)DFW
(59,991 posts)So that was it.
SSJVegeta
(2,613 posts)There was a video I s a w a few days ago posted by a black woman who was also denied voting. After some persistence they ended up letting her cast a provisional ballot... they should at least let you do that.
DFW
(59,991 posts)pinkstarburst
(1,956 posts)nature-lover
(1,860 posts)Cobert aired his interview with Talarico on Feb.16. This poll was taken from Feb 2-16.
applegrove
(131,474 posts)nature-lover
(1,860 posts)Maybe more of my fellow Texans will vote!
pinkstarburst
(1,956 posts)and took place before the Colbert interview.
Very small sample size.
hamsterjill
(17,305 posts)Republicans want Crockett to be the candidate because they feel they can beat her in the general. Everyone that I know has voted for Talarico.
Ill support the winner of the primary, but we have a better chance with Talarico at this time.
Before my ass gets flamed. Im a lifelong Texan and a lifelong Democrat, and Texas is a special case. If you dont live down here, you dont understand the politics.
DFW
(59,991 posts)He said "All politics is local." Truer words were never spoken. O'Neill was a Massachusetts Democrat who was Speaker of the House. In Texas, he would have been lucky to be elected city dog catcher in El Paso.
hamsterjill
(17,305 posts)Thanks. Tip was right!!! I'm old enough to remember him.
I know there's been an awful lot of interest in Texas because there is such hope that it will turn. But I have been cracking up at certain posts (or posters!!!) who seem to want to take the subject matter into a specific direction. Look at their profiles, and guess what? Not anywhere near the action! Things definitely work in their own way around here. Many of us who have lived the cycles for several times start to see a pattern when one candidate is outperforming another. I'm seeing one now.
We are lucky to have both Crockett and Talarico representing Texas, but Talarico is the best choice for this moment in time. Republicans are scared shitless of him. They are not afraid of Crockett.
Skittles
(170,609 posts)I really wish she would have sat this one out.
hamsterjill
(17,305 posts)I felt like she just jumped on the bandwagon at the last minute after she saw the writing on the wall. It's just not her time. I don't care what the polls are saying. I live in a very red area, and I've had Republicans tell me that if Talarico wins, that they will vote for him in the General. They will not vote for Crockett.
These Republicans see Talarico as moderate and they like the way he approaches all of the religion stuff. They make fun of Crockett. They don't like her brashness and they don't like her appearance. They feel she comes off as a smartass rather than a knowledgeable professional.
Now, that's pretty shallow on their part, but it is what it is. I didn't think I would ever hear the end of the "Christmas Tree" earrings that she wore in the debate. LOL [Their words; not mine.] Interestingly enough, these people say the same things about Erika Kirk's appearance. They don't like the "bling" on a "grieving" widow.
Skittles
(170,609 posts)I know a lot of it is unfair although as a woman who owns no jewelry I cringe when gals decorate themselves like Christmas trees and I detest the sleeveless look and the ridiculously long eyelashes, I think this stuff is unprofessional and very much contributes to women not being taken seriously.
hamsterjill
(17,305 posts)If someone works in fashion, I can readily see going all out with the exciting and new! But if someone works in a law firm, they are expected to look professional. A school teacher probably wants to dress in a practical way with kids jumping on her all day - something easy to wash, etc.
Politicians, in MY opinion, should be selling their ideas; not their appearance.
AOC comes to mind. I know she's faced some scrutiny, but she's learned to dress pretty conservatively when she's working. She saves the "wow" moments for when she's out on the town. I think her command of that has helped her be taken seriously and also has kept the belief that she's too young to serve to a minimum. She's mastered it - even with the criticisms.
Some have not mastered it yet.
Just my opinion, of course.
I guess that makes me... OLD!!! LOL
Jack Valentino
(4,783 posts)"We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now".
~ Martin Luther King
Coming from an older white male, my primary objection to your post is the line
"It's just not her time."
I thought the same about Obama in 2008--- at first---
I didn't believe America was ready to elect an AA as President!
I thank GOD or whatever that I was wrong!
I was backing Edwards, but when Obama WON the lily-white Democratic Iowa caucuses,
I jumped onto the Obama bandwagon!!!
YES, Talarico may be the more 'strategic' Democratic candidate
for the U.S. Senate in Texas in 2026, according to 'conventional' political strategy---
and 'conventional' political strategy led Hillary Clinton
to select a white male as her running mate in 2016---
which in my humble opinion, cost her the election....
(I advocated for an African-American running mate at the time,
no matter who--- to attempt to decrease the inevitable AA voter turnout falloff,
after the first African-American President! and seems I was completely correct about that!)
Anyway, I don't like to see a woman saying that 'it isn't yet time' for an AA woman
in any political campaign below the presidential level, before the primary has happened
(and it looks like she might well win it, although I would be fine with either, as an outsider)
For a U.S. Senator from Texas, I would definitely pick Crockett,
if it was up to me--- but from a 'political strategy' standpoint,
I might pick the other---
--- but I don't have a primary vote in Texas,
and I have been wrong before---
do you understand what I am trying to say here ??
hamsterjill
(17,305 posts)I feel like you are "mansplaining" to me when you ask that question. I sincerely hope that I'm wrong. I'm quite capable of understanding.
Now...perhaps you have misunderstood my comment, or maybe I didn't say it as clearly as I should. It's not her time right now because she filed and joined the race quite a while after Talarico had already been campaigning and had a big following. Her entrance into the race divided the voters' choice. I thought her timing was a mistake. Talarico was already doing quite well.
I also thought that Colin Allred's comments about Talarico (which were made obviously to benefit Crockett) brought a degree of negativity into a race that HAD been quite civil. Civility seems to be why some people like Talarico.
Crockett has also taken money from Henry Cuellar's PAC as well as said she would do away with assault rifles. The latter was the blow that killed Beto's chances. Do *I* want assault rifles banned? Hell yes, I grew up in Uvalde. But Is Texas ready for that at this moment in time? Hell no.
The comment had nothing to do with the fact that she's Black or that she's a woman; it had to do with her timing of entering the race.
No...do you understand what *I'm* trying to say here?
As I said in an earlier post on this thread, if you don't live in Texas, you don't understand the politics. That's just the way it is down here. It's not the typical political atmosphere - particularly not now. Texas is a ginormous state and encompasses lifestyles that some don't even remember exist any more.
Obama won (thankfully!) because he was in a much bigger, broader election area (i.e., the whole country). Of course he didn't win Texas. THIS is Texas down here and we do not have the political capital (yet) to make mistakes. Let's get it turned back to blue and THEN we can press for more.
I feel like Crockett has a bright future, and I hope she does. I will be an ardent supporter IF she wins the primary. But I will also feel that she has little chance of winning the General. I won't show it, but deep down, I'll know. Because I'm a realist, a lifelong Texan, and a lifelong Democrat - and I know how things work in Texas. I'm joined on this thread by several other Texans who have voiced similar mindsets.
You are free to disagree, of course - all the way from Michigan!!!
kwolf68
(8,412 posts)dumb miscalculation by the Democratic establishment. Thankfully, Shumer's shenanigans in Maine are backfiring in spectacular fashion as Pastner is surely going to waltz all over the old, tired, bored and complicit Mills before he takes the US Senate in Maine from a most concerned Senator, much to Chucks chagrin.
Crockett is great, but she's not gonna win in Texas. Talarico is literally the only chance the Democrats have. And also he comes from a "religious left" perspective. It is an absolute imperative the Democrats get someone like this into the Senate who can challenge the narrative being pushed by the theocratic right.
If Talarico gets it he wins, if Crockett gets it she loses (NOT because she isn't good). I'll bookmark this post.
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,914 posts)It does not surprise me that this polling is not clear
Link to tweet
Emerson: Talarico +9
UT Texas: Crockett +12
Hobby: Crockett +8
Impact: Talarico +4
Slingshot: Crockett +1
(All polls pre-Colbert Talarico surge)
Polling is all over the place. This seems like an especially tough race to poll/model turnout. 🤷♂️
Jack Valentino
(4,783 posts)anything can happen
Skittles
(170,609 posts)Jack Valentino
(4,783 posts)it's very interesting how many other Republicans attack her,
and SPEND MONEY to do so! One can only conclude
that those Republicans FEAR her!--- or they wouldn't open their wallets
trying to influence the decision in the Democratic primary!
I'm ok with either likely Democratic candidate who will eventually emerge from the primary!
In EITHER case, they'll have 'the electoral wind at their back',
and we may FINALLY win a state-wide election in Texas,
for the first time in decades!
applegrove
(131,474 posts)while Talarico appeals to the better angels of their present hearts. She could get people hopping mad. Rethugs/MAGA are afraid of people becoming hopping mad and psychologically healthy in that.
Jack Valentino
(4,783 posts)which has been their pattern without diaper-Don on the ballot in off-year elections....
As for 'better angels', I don't believe that maggots HAVE any...!