Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Alito's Latest Opinion Is a Very, Very Bad Sign for Voting Rights
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/03/samuel-alito-opinion-new-york-voting-rights-act-supreme-court/The Supreme Court on Monday evening overturned a New York state court ruling that found that the Staten Island-based district of Republican US House Rep. Nicole Malliotakis discriminated against Black and Latino voters and needed to be redrawn. The Supreme Courts intervention preserves a GOP-led seat that would have been likely to shift to Democrats this November.
The courts ruling sets a disturbing precedent for voting rights in several ways. Federal courts are supposed to defer to state courts on matters of state law. And the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that courts should not change election laws in the middle of an election season, and in this instance the filing deadline for candidates in New York has already passed.
In her dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan, Justice Sonia Sotomayor blasted the courts conservative majority for using one set of rules to uphold redistricting maps that benefit white voters and Republicans in states like Texas while using a completely different set of rules to strike down maps that benefit racial minorities and Democrats in places like New York.
Time and again, this Court has said that federal courts should not interfere with state-court litigation, Sotomayor wrote. Time and again, this Court has said that federal courts should not meddle with state election laws ahead of an election. Today, the Court says: except for this one, except for this one, and except for this one.
*snip*
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Alito's Latest Opinion Is a Very, Very Bad Sign for Voting Rights (Original Post)
Nevilledog
22 hrs ago
OP
Just one more reason why support for court expansion must be a litmus test for our candidates
Fiendish Thingy
22 hrs ago
#3
Irish_Dem
(80,781 posts)1. The US Supreme Court is all in with a permanent GOP dictatorship.
orangecrush
(29,869 posts)5. Because Democrats are just going to lay down for this shit
bluestarone
(21,990 posts)2. You see, THAT'S the scary part
All they have to do is make a decision. NOW think here. THAT DECISION is FINALE there is not shit we can do about that.
Fiendish Thingy
(22,829 posts)3. Just one more reason why support for court expansion must be a litmus test for our candidates
Without expanding the court and killing the filibuster to do so, it will be impossible to restore rights and repair the damage from the Trump era.
orangecrush
(29,869 posts)4. K&R
UTUSN
(77,502 posts)6. K&R