Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(53,457 posts)
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 10:49 AM Yesterday

At the risk of asking a very stupid question in regards to the reflecting pool

why not just use chlorine to shock it clear of algae and keep it chlorinated to prevent the return of it? I do realize that they would need to filter but I assume that is already going on just not well.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At the risk of asking a very stupid question in regards to the reflecting pool (Original Post) dsc Yesterday OP
it is not now and has never been a swimming pool rampartd Yesterday #1
It seems turning it into a self contained body of water would have been cheaper and more effective than the 15 million dsc Yesterday #3
Just chlorine isn't enough - the still, warm water perfect for the growth of algae. Ocelot II Yesterday #2
Aside from what's already been mentioned thucythucy Yesterday #4
AI response Wiz Imp Yesterday #5
guess that makes sense dsc Yesterday #6
I visited DC in the spring of 2024. Americanme Yesterday #8
Aeration would help. surfered Yesterday #7
Aeration would disturb the surface of the pool so it wouldn't reflect any more. Ocelot II Yesterday #9
How would it be a reflecting pool? obamanut2012 Yesterday #11
It would kill wildlife and pollute the water in the tidal basin obamanut2012 Yesterday #10

rampartd

(5,408 posts)
1. it is not now and has never been a swimming pool
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 10:54 AM
Yesterday

i think it actually connects to the potomac

dsc

(53,457 posts)
3. It seems turning it into a self contained body of water would have been cheaper and more effective than the 15 million
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 10:57 AM
Yesterday

we just spent.

Ocelot II

(131,682 posts)
2. Just chlorine isn't enough - the still, warm water perfect for the growth of algae.
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 10:56 AM
Yesterday

They made it even worse by painting the bottom of the pool dark blue; the dark color causes the water to heat even more, and the ducks add fertilizer. Massive amounts of chlorine will kill it temporarily but it will come back. The real problem is with the plumbing system that supplies and circulates the water, which leaks and has never been repaired. More here: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/05/31/us/trump-reflecting-pool-problems.html?unlocked_article_code=1.qVA.Hbdd.gbkvbjqGoMdC&smid=url-share

thucythucy

(9,170 posts)
4. Aside from what's already been mentioned
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 10:58 AM
Yesterday

chlorine would potentially harm or even kill anything drinking from that water: birds, squirrels, the ocasional cat or dog...

What a mess.

Wiz Imp

(10,698 posts)
5. AI response
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 11:11 AM
Yesterday

The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool is not chlorinated because it is designed as an architectural monument, not a swimming pool. Maintaining standard chlorine levels for its 6.75 million gallons of water would be prohibitively expensive, dangerous to local wildlife, and highly corrosive to the monument's pumps and surrounding structures

It may be AI, but it is 100% accurate.

dsc

(53,457 posts)
6. guess that makes sense
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 11:15 AM
Yesterday

but then it seems the algae is insurmountable unless you are going to just keep recycling the water at a very fast rate.

Americanme

(594 posts)
8. I visited DC in the spring of 2024.
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 11:27 AM
Yesterday

While standing and admiring the reflecting pool, I thought it was beautiful just as it was. I surely didn't have any thoughts that it should look like a swimming pool. Trump is an idiot.

Ocelot II

(131,682 posts)
9. Aeration would disturb the surface of the pool so it wouldn't reflect any more.
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 01:44 PM
Yesterday

It would no longer be a reflecting pool - would defeat the entire purpose of the thing.

obamanut2012

(29,649 posts)
10. It would kill wildlife and pollute the water in the tidal basin
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 01:49 PM
Yesterday

It is not a swimming pool. There is zero reason to put chemicals into it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At the risk of asking a v...