Hospitals gave patients meds during childbirth, then reported them for illicit drug use
Source: USA Today
Published 6:04 a.m. ET Dec. 11, 2024 | Updated 6:04 a.m. ET Dec. 11, 2024
Amairani Salinas was 32 weeks pregnant with her fourth child in 2023 when doctors at a Texas hospital discovered that her baby no longer had a heartbeat. As they prepped her for an emergency cesarean section, they gave her midazolam, a benzodiazepine commonly prescribed to keep patients calm. A day later, the grieving mother was cradling her stillborn daughter when a social worker stopped by her room to deliver another devastating blow: Salinas was being reported to child welfare authorities. A drug test had turned up traces of benzodiazepine the very medication that staff had administered before wheeling her into surgery.
For Victoria Villanueva, pregnant with her first child, the drug detected in her babys system was morphine. Villanueva had arrived at an Indiana hospital at 41 weeks to have her labor induced. To ease the pain of her contractions, doctors gave her narcotics. A day later, a social worker told the new mother: The babys meconium or first bowel movement had tested positive for opiates. Now, instead of bonding with her baby, Villanueva shook with fear that her newborn could be taken away. I didnt even know how to function, she recalled.
What happened to Salinas and Villanueva are far from isolated incidents. Across the country, hospitals are dispensing medications to patients in labor, only to report them to child welfare authorities when they or their newborns test positive for those very same substances on subsequent drug tests, an investigation by The Marshall Project and Reveal has found.
The positive tests are triggered by medications routinely prescribed to millions of birthing patients in the U.S. every year. The drugs include morphine or fentanyl for epidurals or other pain relief, anxiety medications, and two different blood pressure meds prescribed for C-sections. In a time of increasing surveillance and criminalization of pregnant women since the end of Roe v. Wade, the hospital reports have prompted calls to the police, child welfare investigations and even the removal of children from their parents.
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/12/11/pregnant-hospital-drug-test-medicine/76804299007/
brer cat
(26,398 posts)riversedge
(73,267 posts)NotHardly
(1,284 posts)benfranklin1776
(6,593 posts)Jesus God what the hell ever happened to basic sanity and decency
These hospitals create the situation and then choose to knowingly expose the patient to criminal liability because of their own actions. They themselves then ought to be liable for the intentional infliction of emotional distress they caused.
wnylib
(24,547 posts)are experiencing this more than others.
It looks like hospital staff WANT to separate some children from their families. Is there a profitable adoption or other market for these babies and their siblings?
flashman13
(859 posts)skypilot
(8,940 posts)*
NotHardly
(1,284 posts)... my word. I cannot that I have ever so depressed about the future of this country than I am at this point.
Marthe48
(19,181 posts)Deny pain relievers or anti-anxiety medicines to women in labor. Make them suffer.
I hate rwnj
Irish_Dem
(58,803 posts)Solly Mack
(93,053 posts)magicarpet
(16,747 posts)It is all the women's fault.
Silent Type
(7,134 posts)From linked Article:
"Hospital drug testing of pregnant women, which began in the 1980s and spread rapidly during the opioid epidemic, was intended in part to help identify babies who might experience withdrawal symptoms and need extra medical care. Federal law requires hospitals to alert child welfare agencies anytime such babies are born. But a previous investigation by The Marshall Project and Reveal found that the relatively inexpensive, pee-in-a-cup tests favored by many hospitals are highly susceptible to false positives, errors and misinterpretation and many hospitals have failed to put in place safeguards that would protect patients from being reported over faulty test results."
Lancero
(3,108 posts)They'll start following things to the letter. No more using best judgement and refusing to report on drug tests that detected something that was prescribed, gotta kick it over to CPS just to be safe.
Silent Type
(7,134 posts)Hekate
(95,042 posts)Cirsium
(1,019 posts)A doctor's commitment is to the patient's well being. That is what they are paid for. Doctors need to fight, not comply.
Tactical Peek
(1,274 posts)Hekate
(95,042 posts)rurallib
(63,254 posts)a few weeks ago, I believe the show was Reveal.
What the 'system' did to this poor young lady was to say the least criminal.
I think this is the show. https://revealnews.org/podcast/she-ate-a-poppy-seed-salad-child-services-took-her-baby/
2naSalit
(93,098 posts)bucolic_frolic
(47,309 posts)RobinA
(10,175 posts)This starts out talking about women testing positive for the drugs that they were actually given in the hospital. It then jumps to false positives. Two completely different issues told as if it were one issue. Kinda hard to solve a problem if you can't even figure out what the problem is.
barbtries
(29,914 posts)hatred toward women in this country appears to be as ubiquitous as racism. I hate this.
how can the people doing the reporting not know that the positive tests were the result of meds given in a medical setting?!
IronLionZion
(47,036 posts)absolutely stupid to just go straight to assuming illegal drug abuse, when it's legal hospital prescribed use under doctor supervision. Time for process improvements and/or update the laws.
geardaddy
(25,367 posts)Would mothers with Anglo names be reported?
canuckledragger
(1,973 posts)You beat me to it.
geardaddy
(25,367 posts)Great minds!
KT2000
(20,907 posts)the nightmare grows
Faux pas
(15,394 posts)LiberalFighter
(53,503 posts)irisblue
(34,369 posts)GenThePerservering
(2,675 posts)and improper charting rather than a direct attack on women. There is no reason for hospitals to be this sloppy with their charting - oftentimes mistakes are made with lethal results. Unfortunately, this will only increase with greater automation.
(I was an editor and scribe in medical and tech reporting for years, then in quality assurance).
BumRushDaShow
(143,427 posts)good luck with that.
I.e., these are the hospitals that routinely deal with gunshot victims and unsheltered in ERs who not only have physical medical issues but mental ones as well due to untreated psychiatric problems and/or addiction (and who unfortunately often end up wheeled out to the pavement and dumped - and that makes the "news" ).
Because of that constant exposure to actual addicts, they become numb and "assume" that many of their patients are or could also be "addicts".
rubbersole
(8,639 posts)wendyb-NC
(3,855 posts)Clouds Passing
(2,536 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,322 posts)This isn't like finding a few aspirin missing on an inventory - these have to be accounted for. And Lord knows they are going to bill them at a 2000% markup
Which means they are documented in the chart and time stamped with approvals and dose administration.
How is this even a thing?
timms139
(178 posts)demand a drug screen before letting them give any medications then compare the two .