US newspapers are deleting old crime stories, offering subjects a 'clean slate'
Source: The Guardian
Sat 4 Jan 2025 10.00 EST
Civil rights advocates across the US have long fought to free people from their criminal records, with campaigns to expunge old cases and keep peoples past arrests private when they apply for jobs and housing. The efforts are critical, as more than 70 million Americans have prior convictions or arrests roughly one in three adults. But the policies havent addressed one of the most damaging ways past run-ins with police can derail peoples lives: old media coverage.
Some newsrooms are working to fill that gap. A handful of local newspapers across the US have in recent years launched programs to review their archives and consider requests to remove names or delete old stories to protect the privacy of subjects involved in minor crimes.
In the old days, you put a story in the newspaper and it quickly, if not immediately, receded into memory, said Chris Quinn, editor of Cleveland.com and the Plain Dealer newspaper. But because of our [search engine] power, anything we write now about somebody is always front and center.
Quinn pioneered a right-to-be-forgotten experiment in 2018, motivated by the many inquiries he would receive from subjects describing the harms of past crime coverage and pleading for deletion. People would say: Your story is wrecking my life. I made a mistake, but
Ive changed my life. It was long considered taboo in media to retract or alter old stories, particularly when there are no concerns about accuracy. But Quinn said he felt an ethical obligation to rethink those norms. I couldnt take it any more
I just got tired of telling people no and standing on tradition instead of being thoughtful.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/04/newspaper-crime-stories
Mawspam2
(860 posts)Yeah, no. Don't do Republicans work for them. Thay want to erase and memory hole everything.
If someone did a crime and got convicted, no matter what is was, it needs to be a permanent part of the record. Let them explain why it no longer matters.
LeftInTX
(30,989 posts)summer_in_TX
(3,338 posts)I think it makes sense in many cases if the person is not a career criminal. A fresh start.
Polybius
(18,575 posts)Luckily, captured archives last forever.
OldBaldy1701E
(6,734 posts)The internet never forgets. I understand the whole 'clean slate' thing as it applies to people who honestly made a mistake.
BUT...
The nation needs to have information about some people and that information is kept out there for a reason. Giving anyone the capability of removing such information will open the floodgate to the rethugs trying to erase anything they don't like.
Which, most of the time is their own sleazy actions.
Maggiemayhem
(859 posts)Who decides what info is erased?
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Maggiemayhem This message was self-deleted by its author.