GOP leaders openly balk at emergency funding push for Trump's war
Source: Raw Story
March 13, 2026 1:06PM ET
Congressional Republicans are openly rejecting Donald Trump's pleas for emergency funding to sustain the Iran war, signaling deep skepticism within his own party about a conflict that remains broadly unpopular with American voters, according to a report.
Operation Epic Fury has already consumed staggering sums over $1 billion per day, with the Pentagon burning through $11.3 billion in just the first six days of combat. Yet Republican lawmakers are unmoved by White House requests for supplemental spending.
Top Republicans told Politico they see no urgency to boost the Pentagon's already bloated $1 trillion budget. Democrats are unlikely to provide support, making passage of any supplemental package an uphill political battle especially in a midterm election year when Trump needs to campaign on affordability.
The White House faces a political nightmare, Politico reported. It must spend significant time and political capital securing funding for a deeply unpopular war while simultaneously claiming fiscal responsibility.
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/gop-iran/
Deminpenn
(17,440 posts)nt
Bayard
(29,434 posts)progressoid
(53,102 posts)Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) acknowledged the potential for a political fight, but also said Congress cant simply push a supplemental bill for Iran off indefinitely.
Were there, and we have to sustain it, he said. The last thing we want to do is not have the resources to keep the region as settled as possible when you have 40,000 personnel there on a full-time basis.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/13/getting-congress-to-pay-for-the-iran-war-wont-be-an-easy-sell-00826757
BumRushDaShow
(168,823 posts)when no one (the public) is around (vacations and whatnot) to pay attention.
hibbing
(10,581 posts)All talk from them, just like all the other times. Throw in some pork for some Senators and it will be the best bill ever.
Bluetus
(2,677 posts)If they have another half trillion, that won't replace the dwindling stocks of Patriot missiles and the like.
You know what takes a lot of cash? Sending in thousands of ground troops. Good luck getting an appropriation for money to do that. Surely the Republican Senators aren't stupid enough to do that. Are they?
Prairie Gates
(7,967 posts)BumRushDaShow
(168,823 posts)and some are evacuating.

popsdenver
(2,191 posts)by a Private Equity Group, that just recently figured out that their "gouging" of the company, way over did it, and are having to regroup and back off on their canabalizing of the company........
Norrrm
(4,823 posts)More expensive in money and the lives of those Trump considers 'suckers and losers'.
popsdenver
(2,191 posts)are suckers and losers would have figured out from Viet Nam and IRAQ that they are merely cannon fodder for the Military Industrial Complex as well as the U.S. Oil companies........
ToxMarz
(2,893 posts)Gee, ya think?
liberalgunwilltravel
(1,187 posts)Ring a bell?
James48
(5,183 posts)And it seems to me, with the loss of those 3 F-15s ($97 million replacement cost) , and the two KC-135s now out of action ( $79 million each on the books right now) , along with the Thaad, Patriot, and other hi tech missiles, we probably have blown more than that $11 billion they are citing. Im thinking were approaching double that, based on the forces now tagged. This new 5,000 Marine Corp amphibious force is going to add to the price tag too.
Bluetus
(2,677 posts)IronLionZion
(51,129 posts)Tax cuts and tariffs will pay for it the same way Mexico paid for the wall.
mdbl
(8,573 posts)They can certainly afford the shit they supported.