Trump bolts from Supreme Court early as conservative justices skeptical of his arguments
Source: Raw Story
April 1, 2026 11:53AM ET
President Donald Trump reportedly left a Supreme Court hearing early after conservative Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and John Roberts seemed skeptical of ending birthright citizenship.
Shortly following Solicitor General John Sauer's arguments against birthright citizenship, Trump was seen leaving the court, according to NBC News and a pool report.
During oral arguments, Roberts suggested that the U.S. Constitution protected the notion of birthright citizenship.
"We're in a new world where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who's a US citizen," Sauer argued. "It's a new world. It's the same Constitution," Roberts said.
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-bolts-from-scotus-early-as-conservative-justices-skeptical-on-citizenship-argument/?utm_source=superhead
Chasstev365
(7,798 posts)The Republicans Party would say, Anything you say Boss!"
ruet
(10,278 posts)I think 9-0 is pretty close to being the correct prediction.
BumRushDaShow
(169,748 posts)it was an interesting combo of questions and and cross-questions and agreement between justices.
The downside was that damn motor-mouth Sauer. He was literally spewing out his responses in the fashion of the "then dazzle them with bullshit" method of litigating.
The racist POS also doesn't believe that Native Americans/First Peoples are U.S. citizens, but then stumbled over that when questioned by several justices.
Chasstev365
(7,798 posts)charliea
(333 posts)And I hope you're right, but Thomas is bribable, and Alito is a "seven mountains" wackadoodle. The others appear to have decent reading comprehension vis-a-vis the 14th Amendment. It's looking like the best TSF can hope for is a 7-2 decision against his mob boss decree.
My fingers are crossed, and I hope I'm not overly optimistic.
Deminpenn
(17,506 posts)Trump? His mother was in the US illegally after not keeping to the terms of her visa. Therefore he would not have brithright citizenship, correct?
Miguelito Loveless
(5,752 posts)and explained he was losing?
RockRaven
(19,372 posts)highplainsdem
(62,137 posts)babies born here, he's a complete hypocrite objecting to birthright citizenship.
Ray Bruns
(6,362 posts)RobertDevereaux
(2,037 posts)Writers please note: Flump doesnt storm or lash out. He galumphs or limp-noodles out like the drained, doomed flaccidity he is.
Aristus
(72,187 posts)we should point out that when the Second Amendment was ratified, the deadliest firearm in the world was a single-shot musket that took a skilled user over thirty seconds to re-load.
No one at the time could have imagined that one day, a 'new world' would have a firearm capable of killing thirty school children in five seconds with one pull of the trigger. Or that there would be people out there who thought it perfectly acceptable to have un-trained civilians own such firearms.
Blue Owl
(59,101 posts)oasis
(53,693 posts)pat_k
(13,373 posts).. with every insane utterance out of Sauer's mouth.
He couldn't handle the display of disobedience.
Truth social rant alert!!
Mblaze
(1,037 posts)Are not hopping a jet to America to have a child so it can have birthright citizenship. Are they going to just leave the baby here when their visas expire?
It's easy to come up with worst-case scenarios on almost anything.
BootinUp
(51,322 posts)I like that.
Trueblue Texan
(4,464 posts)I'm no lawyer, but even I know that if a law isn't working anymore, you have to change the law, in this case, the Constitution. You can't just stop honoring the Constitution just because the president thinks it doesn't work anymore. Jesus. What morons.
pat_k
(13,373 posts)The idea was once relegated to obscure articles in right-wing journals and little-noticed debates before conservative groups. But Trump ushered it into the limelight on his first day back in office last year by issuing an executive order purporting to upend the well-established understanding that virtually everyone born on U.S. soil gets American citizenship
...
Eastman has been advancing his fringe interpretation of the 14th Amendment since 2005, racking up more than 100 op-eds, interviews, law review articles, debates, speeches and legislative hearings.
John is probably the brain trust, said Ediberto Roman, a Florida International University law professor whos debated Eastman.
...
GiqueCee
(4,257 posts)... who deserves to be disbarred.
Deminpenn
(17,506 posts)for over an hour or more especially when no one in the room was lavishing him with praise. I'm sure he was bored after 10 minutes. Let's be honest, the only reason he even showed up was to try and intimidate the justices.