Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(171,869 posts)
Sun May 10, 2026, 05:08 PM Yesterday

Furious Democrats Reportedly Float Dramatic Idea:Throwing Out Virginia's Supreme Court to Push Through Gerrymandered map

Source: MEDIAite

May 10th, 2026, 4:11 pm


Angry Democratic lawmakers held a venting session this weekend to complain about Virginia’s Supreme Court overturning its new gerrymandered map — and some of the Dems floated a “dramatic idea”: replacing the state’s Supreme Court in order to push through the new map anyway.

That’s according to a report from The New York Times on Sunday afternoon. The paper reported “struggling” Dems like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) held a private discussion on Saturday, where they fumed about the court’s ruling from a day earlier. They also strategized a potential counterstrike. Journalist Reid J. Epstein reported the group discussed the “audacious and possibly far-fetched idea” to get the map they all desperately want.

Not everyone loved the plan, though. “The most dramatic idea they discussed — which would involve an unusual gambit to replace the entire state Supreme Court, with a goal of reinstating their gerrymandered map — drew mixed reactions on the call,” Epstein reported. He added, “it was not clear that it would even be viable, or palatable to Gov. Abigail Spanberger and Democrats in the Virginia General Assembly.” Several Democratic lawmakers representing Virginia in the House were also on the call.

“They did not land on a specific course forward, and Mr. Jeffries and the other members of Congress agreed to consult with their lawyers about the most prudent way to proceed, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a private talk,” the report added. The Dem discussion comes as both parties are locked in a redistricting battle heading into the 2026 midterms. Friday’s ruling from Virginia was a blow to Democrats, since the new map would have given the party an advantage in 10 out of the state’s 11 congressional districts.

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/politics/furious-democrats-reportedly-float-dramatic-idea-throwing-out-virginias-supreme-court-to-push-through-gerrymandered-map/



Full headline: Furious Democrats Reportedly Float ‘Dramatic’ Idea: Throwing Out Virginia’s Supreme Court to Push Through Gerrymandered Map

As a note - the VA state Supreme Court Justices are elected for 12- year terms by a majority vote of the VA General Assembly (which is both chambers).
51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Furious Democrats Reportedly Float Dramatic Idea:Throwing Out Virginia's Supreme Court to Push Through Gerrymandered map (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP
As the kids say, Do It! Do It! Do It! Chasstev365 Yesterday #1
I'm equally angry, but is there no alternative solution? This freaks me out--especially with the timing. hlthe2b Yesterday #2
When faced with an existential threat, tomorrow can wait. paleotn 23 hrs ago #17
SCOTUS went nuclear first Bobstandard 18 hrs ago #28
GOP SCOTUS went nuclear with in 2000 with Bush vs Gore ruling DemocracyForever 18 hrs ago #34
Valid argument. We weren't first to act. paleotn 6 hrs ago #46
I have great doubts about whether Gov Spanberger would go for it. scipan 18 hrs ago #29
A Private Call Reveals Democrats' Desperation Over Tossing of Map (NYT gift article) LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #3
Original title: Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #4
Speaking as a Virginia Democrat" AverageOldGuy Yesterday #5
This orangecrush 21 hrs ago #24
We don't have to do any of that to achieve new lines for 2028 FBaggins 19 hrs ago #27
That's a mistake, IMHO RussBLib Yesterday #6
My thinking, Give the Virginia SC ONE warning that this is what will be done if they refuse. BUT bluestarone Yesterday #7
Virginia Supreme , intelpug 15 hrs ago #37
When republicans pull similar actions to combat Democrats, their members don't worry about it, they just do it. MLWR Yesterday #8
They're doing that in Iowa too Bettie 11 hrs ago #42
Whether they should do it or not... DET Yesterday #9
Democrats need to start taking bold and decisive actions. magicarpet 23 hrs ago #10
That is your perception Boo1 18 hrs ago #31
what if the new court rules the same? msongs 23 hrs ago #11
Make sure it doesn't. paleotn 23 hrs ago #16
what if the new court rules the differently? Torchlight 11 hrs ago #41
Think about what happens if we let the GOP redistricting advantage cost us the House. SamuelAdams 23 hrs ago #12
Dems eye 'audacious' secret plan to oust entire blue state Supreme Court: report LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #13
Bottom line, if Democrats have any political courage at all, they will tear it down and then rebuild PatrickforB 23 hrs ago #14
Flip the script. Rethugs would start doing this Monday 8am. NoMoreRepugs 23 hrs ago #15
give it a go, magats would DoBW 22 hrs ago #18
Do it! nt in2herbs 22 hrs ago #19
Extraordinary times require extraordinary measures. If we don't take the house back in November, we lose our demcracy. Fil1957 22 hrs ago #20
Just do whatever Republicans would do and tell everyone to f**k off. rickford66 22 hrs ago #21
Is this really dramatic? Zelda_Orchid 22 hrs ago #22
DO IT DO IT DO IT orangecrush 21 hrs ago #23
That's a pretty aggressive proposal. NH Ethylene 21 hrs ago #25
Ohio Repugs ignored their state supreme court when it came to redistricting mikewv 20 hrs ago #26
Mike Dewine specifically multiple times... OhioBack2Blue 12 hrs ago #38
They should follow West Virginia's example. Lasher 18 hrs ago #30
well there's Spanberger, Ms bipartisan. and IF they can't cheat, we scipan 18 hrs ago #32
I hope they find a way to make lemonade out of this lemon juice. COL Mustard 18 hrs ago #33
My prediction LPBBEAR 16 hrs ago #35
You made your ruling now enforce it! bluestateboomer 16 hrs ago #36
Dems cry saying they are "playing by the rules" OhioBack2Blue 11 hrs ago #39
Maybe I am missing something dsc 11 hrs ago #40
Would require constitutional amendment Shrek 8 hrs ago #45
OK that makes sense dsc 4 hrs ago #47
It isn't "pushing through a gerrymandered map," intheflow 10 hrs ago #43
This isn't the first time that a constitutional amendment passed by voters was overturned by courts. MichMan 9 hrs ago #44
That was the national court dsc 4 hrs ago #48
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan 2 hrs ago #51
Test Run Kid Berwyn 3 hrs ago #49
Trump Wins Big as Virginia Dems Won't Go Nuclear to Save 4 House Seats LetMyPeopleVote 3 hrs ago #50

hlthe2b

(114,535 posts)
2. I'm equally angry, but is there no alternative solution? This freaks me out--especially with the timing.
Sun May 10, 2026, 05:15 PM
Yesterday

It smacks of a nuclear option that might reverberate for years/decades.

I get the strong "Do IT" reaction as that was almost reflexively mine as well, but, damn!

paleotn

(22,626 posts)
17. When faced with an existential threat, tomorrow can wait.
Sun May 10, 2026, 07:23 PM
23 hrs ago

But I don't think it will happen. I don't think it needs to. I still think the ground swell will be enough to overwhelm anything the Pukes are doing. Little gerrymandering required. $5 gas and the the repercussions of that aren't going anywhere. It will still be an unholy mess in November. And that's if Donnie doesn't do additional crazy shit in the mean time. We all know he will. He's his own worst enemy.

Bobstandard

(2,366 posts)
28. SCOTUS went nuclear first
Sun May 10, 2026, 11:26 PM
18 hrs ago

A nuclear response is appropriate. In fact, anything less is surrender. Every if it doesn’t succeed it’s a necessary statement.

DemocracyForever

(161 posts)
34. GOP SCOTUS went nuclear with in 2000 with Bush vs Gore ruling
Mon May 11, 2026, 12:06 AM
18 hrs ago

If the U.S. Senate dems had gone nuclear in response to the unconstitutional Bush vs Gore ruling, by co-sponsoring the Congressional Black Caucus's challenge to the fraudulent Florida 2000 vot3e count, our country wouldn't now be about to become a Nazi dictatorship. If sure is a big word.

scipan

(3,098 posts)
29. I have great doubts about whether Gov Spanberger would go for it.
Sun May 10, 2026, 11:32 PM
18 hrs ago

Voted the "most bipartisan"…..

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,688 posts)
3. A Private Call Reveals Democrats' Desperation Over Tossing of Map (NYT gift article)
Sun May 10, 2026, 05:16 PM
Yesterday

I personally believe that given the ruling by Alito and other GOP gerrymandering, the steps outlined here are appropriate.



https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/10/us/politics/democrats-virginia-plans-gerrymandering.html?unlocked_article_code=1.hVA.KzAI.Wf17nRa9PSjl&smid=nytcore-ios-share

During a private discussion on Saturday that included Democratic House members from Virginia and Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the minority leader, the lawmakers vented anger at their defeat at the Virginia Supreme Court, spoke about a collective determination to flip two or three Republican-held seats under the existing map and discussed a bank-shot proposal to redraw the congressional lines anyway, according to three people who participated in the call and two others who were briefed on it.....

Any plans to enact a new congressional map for this year’s midterm elections would require action in the next few days. In a court filing last month, Steven Koski, the commissioner of the Virginia Department of Elections, said any changes to the maps after Tuesday, May 12, “will significantly increase the risk” of his agency being unable to properly prepare for the state’s scheduled Aug. 4 primary election......

One key to the plan would be having Democrats in Richmond lower the mandatory retirement age for state Supreme Court justices, an idea that began circulating among state lawmakers and members of Congress after a column proposing a version of the idea was published on Friday night in The Downballot, a progressive newsletter.

Ms. Spanberger would have to sign off on any legislation that lowered the judicial retirement age. She has not been briefed on the proposal, the people involved in the discussion or briefed on it said. Her spokeswoman, Libby Wiet, declined to comment.

The first step in the process, as discussed on the delegation’s call, would be to invoke a January ruling by a circuit court judge in Tazewell County, Va., that said the 2026 constitutional amendment effort to redraw the maps was invalid because county officials did not post notice of it at courthouses and other public locations three months before a general election.

Representative Suhas Subramanyam, a Democrat who represents Loudoun County, Va., said in an interview that he supported doing whatever was necessary to preserve the map voters approved in last month’s referendum — including replacing the state’s Supreme Court justices.

Everyone has got to have a strong stomach right now; this is a complete disaster waiting to happen if people are timid,” said Mr. Subramanyam, who was on the Saturday call. “We have Republican states ignoring their constitutions and interrupting early voting and ignoring their Supreme Courts all together. We know based on that, Republicans would explore every single option possible to move this forward.”....

In an interview on Friday night, before his Saturday meeting with Virginia lawmakers, Mr. Jeffries said he was “exploring how to unravel this decision.”

“It’s an all-hands-on-deck moment, and it’s unprecedented in American history as far as we can tell that an actual election has been overturned by a handful of unelected judges,” Mr. Jeffries said. “We’re not going to step back, we will continue to fight back.”

This is a very aggressive plan which could backfire. However, this plan may be necessary to stop trump's gerrymandering.

Fiendish Thingy

(23,936 posts)
4. Original title:
Sun May 10, 2026, 05:23 PM
Yesterday

“Dems come up with an audacious, courageous response to VASC ruling, then decide it is simply too audacious and courageous to pursue”.

FIFY

( )

My understanding is that three of conservative justices’ terms end before 2028, and the ruling gave a road map for how to get the amendment past the current court, so these other solutions are sort of Hail Mary option to get the new map for 2026.

AverageOldGuy

(4,129 posts)
5. Speaking as a Virginia Democrat"
Sun May 10, 2026, 05:53 PM
Yesterday

DO IT. We have three choices:

1. Two Justices' terms end before the 2028 election. When their terms expire, put in Democrats, giving us a 5-2 edge.

2. Special legislative session, lower the retirement age, thereby dumping several judges now, put in young Democrats.

3. Do nothing and continue to eat shit.

#3 is unaccetable.

#1 or #2 is fine with me. Yes, we will have to listen to bitching and moaning from Republicans nationwide but screw 'em, it's time we take lots of big guns to a gunfight.

FBaggins

(28,739 posts)
27. We don't have to do any of that to achieve new lines for 2028
Sun May 10, 2026, 10:56 PM
19 hrs ago

There will be a general election this November... that "counts" in a way last year's election didn't. They can pass the amendment again after November and have a new referendum with lines in place before 2028

RussBLib

(10,726 posts)
6. That's a mistake, IMHO
Sun May 10, 2026, 05:57 PM
Yesterday

Just lower the retirement age of the VSC and appoint new ones? Don’t think I’ve ever heard of the GOP doing that.

Since redistricting to benefit blacks now seems off-limits, then we should redistrict to bunch all the Republicans together in one or two districts and leave the rest for the Dems. That is certainly not racist, but it is still discrimination.

https://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1



bluestarone

(22,429 posts)
7. My thinking, Give the Virginia SC ONE warning that this is what will be done if they refuse. BUT
Sun May 10, 2026, 06:01 PM
Yesterday

Be READY to DO IT, if you warn them. DO NOT warn them if you're not gonna follow through!!

intelpug

(168 posts)
37. Virginia Supreme ,
Mon May 11, 2026, 02:58 AM
15 hrs ago

Give the court one warning , Warning of what? They already made their ruling, They are hardly going to take it back now

MLWR

(1,068 posts)
8. When republicans pull similar actions to combat Democrats, their members don't worry about it, they just do it.
Sun May 10, 2026, 06:19 PM
Yesterday

"North Carolina Republicans passed legislation in November and December 2024 to strip key powers from newly elected Democratic officials, including incoming Governor Josh Stein and other Council of State members... The Republican-led General Assembly moved to weaken the authority of the incoming Democratic governor and attorney general before they took office."
What Democrats are attempting in this instance doesn't appear to me to be any more "audatious."

Bettie

(19,840 posts)
42. They're doing that in Iowa too
Mon May 11, 2026, 07:10 AM
11 hrs ago

they seem pretty sure that Rob Sand is going to win, so they are busily stripping all power from the governor's office.

ETA: At this point, he MIGHT be allowed to use the governor's actual physical office, but that's not even a sure thing (sarcasm, mostly).

magicarpet

(19,341 posts)
10. Democrats need to start taking bold and decisive actions.
Sun May 10, 2026, 06:42 PM
23 hrs ago

We have pussy footed around trying to be likeable gentlemen who cherish following protocols and decorum. But where has this gotten us with these ruthless Fascists.

These Nazis mean business to take and to hold America as exclusively their own and mold it to fit their grand idealizations of their warped god, his warped laws, a their warped church - as they seek to build a warped interpretation of a more perfect and ideal Fascist Theocratic Utopia.

Our Democratic form of goverance is not perfect but there is much we can do to improve upon, build upon, and make it better. If we would finally work together in unison and collaborate our intellect, our abilities, and our productive energies.

First of all we must tar and feather the Fascists and Nazis among us, run them the fuck out of town and out of all levels of our government.

Then boldly get down to the business of getting this government and country back on track and fully operational once again. But not repeating and reiterating the mistakes often made in the past.

Time is against us,.. we have fallen very very deeply into the abyss of Fascism. Most people have hardly even noticed the depth of the danger zone we have crossed into. Ushered here to this point by the often trusted and guiding hand of trump's runaway Fascistic MAGA-ISM.

Purging, disinfecting, and cleansing our country of this vile toxin of MAGA-ISM is priority number one requiring our immediate attention.

Let the consequesnces be suffered for those who brought us here. Then let the healing begin so that which was dismantled, destucted, and destroyed can be repaired and restored.

The country, its people, and their government have taken gigantic leaps and steps backwards and much corrective actions must be taken to clear the slate of this MAGA scourge.

Boo1

(444 posts)
31. That is your perception
Sun May 10, 2026, 11:43 PM
18 hrs ago

"likeable gentlemen who cherish following protocols and decorum"

I have seen no evidence that this is true.

SamuelAdams

(166 posts)
12. Think about what happens if we let the GOP redistricting advantage cost us the House.
Sun May 10, 2026, 07:07 PM
23 hrs ago

I still think we win back the House but the more they gerrymander, the more likely they could hold the House. If they also keep the Senate, they would be emboldened to cut more money from the social safety net, maybe end programs altogether. They might decide to end the filibuster to pass the SAVE Act. There would be no check on this administration. The war in Iran could continue the next 2 years. He could attack Cuba, Greenland, and anyone else he wants. ICE and border patrol would continue with no checks. We should think about those consequences before refusing to do anything that would upset Republicans.

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,688 posts)
13. Dems eye 'audacious' secret plan to oust entire blue state Supreme Court: report
Sun May 10, 2026, 07:14 PM
23 hrs ago

Given the outrageous ruling by SCOTUS, the GO P actions taken in Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi and Alabama, these steps are appropriate. The GOP cannot claim clean hands given the steps taken by SCOTUS and these states.

Dems eye 'audacious' secret plan to oust entire blue state Supreme Court: report

DO IT! Get creatove Dems. No shame. No "but my precious decorum". Fight. The. Fascists. #Virginia

www.rawstory.com/virginia-red...

br00t4c (@br00t4c.bsky.social) 2026-05-10T19:51:47.254Z

https://www.rawstory.com/virginia-redistricting-2676875271/

Congressional Democrats are quietly kicking around a long-shot scheme to clear out Virginia's entire Supreme Court, which just torched their gerrymandered congressional map.

During a private Saturday call that included Virginia's Democratic House delegation and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), lawmakers vented over Friday's ruling and floated what The New York Times described as "an audacious and possibly far-fetched idea" to replace every sitting justice and reinstate their map, according to a Sunday report.

The scheme includes lowering the mandatory judicial retirement age from 75 to 54 — the age of the youngest current justice — forcing all seven off the bench. Virginia judges are appointed by the Democratic-controlled General Assembly, which could then stack the court with friendly replacements.

"The conversation reflected the desperation and fury that have gripped the party after the state Supreme Court struck down a favorable map that had been ratified by voters," the Times wrote, calling the mass ouster the "most dramatic idea they discussed."

The idea reportedly drew "mixed reactions" on the call, and Democrats did not land on a path forward. Gov. Abigail Spanberger has not been briefed, her spokeswoman told the Times. Former Rep. James Moran (D-VA) warned the gambit would be "just a bridge too far" and could backfire.

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA), who was on the call, told the Times he supports doing whatever is necessary, adding: "Everyone has got to have a strong stomach right now; this is a complete disaster waiting to happen if people are timid."

PatrickforB

(15,513 posts)
14. Bottom line, if Democrats have any political courage at all, they will tear it down and then rebuild
Sun May 10, 2026, 07:16 PM
23 hrs ago

something better and much less corrupt in its place.

Honestly, I don't think the idea of Trump as an aberration and then back to business as usual is going to work this time. When Republicans stopped wanting to actually govern and instead went all-out on winning and amassing power, they became a cancer that needs to be rooted out, as so Wall Street and the modern robber barons.

We need to be using block chain to ensure absolute transparency around where money goes and imposing severe sanctions on corruption. This, of course, will cause us to have to rethink the whole first and second chakra blockages that have allowed the paranoid and profit-hungry military industrial complex to grow into the corrupt monster it is.

I'm fucking TIRED of having MY tax dollars spent on shit that doesn't even come close to helping me. A trillion dollar war budget? Sorry - rather have HEALTHCARE. A huge bloated secret police force called ICE rounding up brown skinned people? Sorry - rather have free college for my grandkids. A prison-industrial complex with concentration camps as its flagship? Nope. Sorry. I'd much rather have childcare subsidies. A political-industrial complex that soaks people for money in return for 'fighting for' them? Sigh. Sorry - rather have the rules of corporate governance FORCIBLY changed to a stakeholder approach that holds the interests of workers, consumers (including truth in news reporting) and the environment equal to shareholder profits. Reinstatement of Jim Crow due to the Klan part of the Supreme Court legislating from the bench? Nope. Absolultely not. I want the original voting rights act COMPLETELY REINSTATED IMMEDIATELY. Gerrymanders? Nope. It would be much better to have nonpartisan groups set logical boundaries based on actual communities.

To reiterate in ways the Democratic movers and shakers on this site can understand better, I'm FUCKING TIRED of being TAXED WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. Because this government the Democrats allowed to cheat its way into power with the help of Thiel, Musk and other tech-bro robber barons is the end game of the effort Wall Street financiers and robber barons begun clear back in 1935 to gut the New Deal which they hated.

I'm so fucking tired of these little boys in billionaire suits sucking energy from the grid like parasites with their AI data centers, designed ultimately to impose a surveillance state on us.

When are we going to fucking WAKE UP and get ugly?

You know our government has pretty much stopped even pretending to

NoMoreRepugs

(12,216 posts)
15. Flip the script. Rethugs would start doing this Monday 8am.
Sun May 10, 2026, 07:21 PM
23 hrs ago

Start fighting, who cares if we lose a fight or two? We need to win this war.

Fil1957

(842 posts)
20. Extraordinary times require extraordinary measures. If we don't take the house back in November, we lose our demcracy.
Sun May 10, 2026, 08:15 PM
22 hrs ago

November is our last chance, and we must use all legal means to secure that election.

Zelda_Orchid

(102 posts)
22. Is this really dramatic?
Sun May 10, 2026, 08:18 PM
22 hrs ago

Every Republican appointee, in every branch of government, at every level, needs to be impeached & removed from office. THEN we can get back to normal.

NH Ethylene

(31,390 posts)
25. That's a pretty aggressive proposal.
Sun May 10, 2026, 09:13 PM
21 hrs ago

It may not happen, but kudos for the Dems for stepping up to play hardball.

mikewv

(297 posts)
26. Ohio Repugs ignored their state supreme court when it came to redistricting
Sun May 10, 2026, 09:32 PM
20 hrs ago

why not do the same?

OhioBack2Blue

(194 posts)
38. Mike Dewine specifically multiple times...
Mon May 11, 2026, 06:25 AM
12 hrs ago

He not only gave the Ohio Supreme Court the finger he also told the voters to go screw themselves, after 2015 and 2018 referendums were passed imposing fair maps!

Gov. Supine is no moderate, centrist and in 2023 Ohio republicons held the first statewide, unlawful election using illegal maps. Not hyperbole, actual fact.

Ohio, which has been one party rule for decades, is now an actual theocratic autocracy with Christian Nationalists controlling Gov. Supine from the statehouse and dictating to citizens of Ohio.

Under such conditions, Ohio has declined from a top tier state, down to 38th worst states out of 50, across 71 different quality measures (USN&WR, both 2024 and 2025).

Lasher

(29,651 posts)
30. They should follow West Virginia's example.
Sun May 10, 2026, 11:41 PM
18 hrs ago

The GOP WV Legislature cooked up bogus charges against several state Supreme Court Justices and forced them out. Our GOP governor subsequently appointed new Justices to take their places. Since it worked for the GOP in WV, I don't know why the same tactic wouldn't work for Democrats in Virginia.

scipan

(3,098 posts)
32. well there's Spanberger, Ms bipartisan. and IF they can't cheat, we
Sun May 10, 2026, 11:49 PM
18 hrs ago

Are already set to take 224-225 House seats, if all toss ups go our way. That's from the Cook political report and Larry Sabato's crystal Ball. Ratings keep moving leftward as well.

The big question mark is the cheating.

COL Mustard

(8,353 posts)
33. I hope they find a way to make lemonade out of this lemon juice.
Sun May 10, 2026, 11:57 PM
18 hrs ago

In normal times I’d be against something like this, but these ain’t normal times. It’s time to play hardball.

LPBBEAR

(682 posts)
35. My prediction
Mon May 11, 2026, 01:33 AM
16 hrs ago

As with past issues the Dems will ultimately do nothing. They'll talk a lot, threaten to do something, write a few strongly worded letters, make some noise, but ultimately, they'll do nothing. As a result of the inaction we'll see Trump in for a third and lifetime term.

What should happen.

Actions that are as dirty and lowdown as anything the Republicans come up with and worse. Every Democratically controlled state should gerrymander the fuck out of their states and do everything in their power to disenfranchise every goddamn fucking Republican from the ability to vote. Fuck them and their fucking feelings.

OhioBack2Blue

(194 posts)
39. Dems cry saying they are "playing by the rules"
Mon May 11, 2026, 06:41 AM
11 hrs ago

....the rules have changed! The republicons changed them.... don't like it? Too late.... you ignored warnings for decades....you've done little to hold RCons accountable to the old law and order rules.

Mike Dewine, for example, should be in jail, not only for his defiance of the Ohio Supreme Court 7 times but also his, knowledge of and involvement in, the First Energy corporation / statehouse bribery scandal- the largest corruption scandal in the history of Ohio.

Get with the program Dems!

There are the new rules, at least temporarily, and until you can figure out some way to hold RCons accountable you will need to leverage these strategies to save Democracy and the country.

.

dsc

(53,438 posts)
40. Maybe I am missing something
Mon May 11, 2026, 06:56 AM
11 hrs ago

but since for this plan to work a rehearing would be needed, why not just expand the size of the court by 2 seats, appoint the 2 seats, get the case reheard, and it would be 5 to 4 for the referendum instead of 4 to 3 against. That would be in line with what states such as Utah have done.

Shrek

(4,456 posts)
45. Would require constitutional amendment
Mon May 11, 2026, 10:20 AM
8 hrs ago
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/constitution/article6/section2/

The Supreme Court shall consist of seven justices. The General Assembly may, if three-fifths of the elected membership of each house so vote at two successive regular sessions, increase or decrease the number of justices of the Court, provided that the Court shall consist of no fewer than seven and no more than eleven justices. The Court may sit and render final judgment en banc or in divisions as may be prescribed by law. No decision shall become the judgment of the Court, however, except on the concurrence of at least three justices, and no law shall be declared unconstitutional under either this Constitution or the Constitution of the United States except on the concurrence of at least a majority of all justices of the Supreme Court.

MichMan

(17,361 posts)
44. This isn't the first time that a constitutional amendment passed by voters was overturned by courts.
Mon May 11, 2026, 09:04 AM
9 hrs ago

Not saying it is the same thing, but it does happen.

In 2006, Virginia voters passed a constitutional amendment stating marriage was defined as being between a man and a woman. It passed by 57%, but was later ruled unconstitutional in 2014.

A referendum is scheduled for November 2026 to officially repeal the 2006 law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Virginia_Question_1

Response to dsc (Reply #48)

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,688 posts)
50. Trump Wins Big as Virginia Dems Won't Go Nuclear to Save 4 House Seats
Mon May 11, 2026, 03:06 PM
3 hrs ago

This is disappointing
The state’s Democrats have decided against forcing resignations on the state Supreme Court to preserve their redistricting. Funny how Republicans always find a way, and Democrats don’t.



https://newrepublic.com/article/210250/trump-virginia-dems-redistricting-war

Top Virginia Democrats have decided against exercising a controversial procedural end run around last week’s state Supreme Court ruling that struck down their redistricting, which wiped away a gain of four House seats, the Democratic leader of the state Senate told The New Republic.

The decision—which nixes a complicated idea, discussed over the weekend by Democrats, to replace the state Supreme Court and get the case reheard—is likely to anger rank-and-file Democrats who had hoped the party would respond aggressively to the ruling, which has made it more likely that Republicans hold the House this fall.

The decision also contrasts sharply with moves undertaken by many GOP state legislatures in the South, who are aggressively gerrymandering their states with wild abandon to erase decades-old majority-majority seats from existence, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a key Voting Rights Act protection against racial gerrymanders.

“As a practical matter,” Virginia’s state Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell said in an interview, the move “would not be capable of being implemented” given the “time frame.”

The decision effectively kills off hopes of getting back the four House seats that Democrats had moved into their column by pulling off a victory in last month’s referendum, which redrew the state’s House map. Last week, the state Supreme Court struck down the new map, wiping away that potential four-seat gain.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Furious Democrats Reporte...