Ballroom security money nixed by Senate parliamentarian
Source: Politico
Ballroom security money nixed by Senate parliamentarian
Republicans proposed sending $1 billion to the Secret Service, with some to be used on the controversial White House project.

Artist renderings of the new White House East Wing and Ballroom are photographed Tuesday, March 31, 2026. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick) | AP
By Jordain Carney
05/16/2026 09:52 PM EDT
Updated: 05/16/2026 10:20 PM EDT
President Donald Trumps hopes of using public funding to secure his proposed White House ballroom are under threat after a Senate official said Saturday a $1 billion Secret Service line item could not be included in a GOP immigration enforcement bill as drafted.
Elizabeth MacDonough, the chambers parliamentarian, ruled that the language aimed at enhancing Secret Service security measures would need to be reworked if Republicans want to pass the larger bill along party lines as planned, according to a statement from Budget Committee Democrats.
MacDonough, the Democrats said, struck the entire Secret Service provision because it included funding that fell outside of the jurisdiction of the Judiciary Committee, which included the language in their portion of the immigration enforcement bill. The administration estimated that approximately $220 million of the $1 billion would go toward the White House construction project.
While we expect Republicans to change this bill to appease Trump, Democrats are prepared to challenge any change to this bill, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the top Budget Committee Democrat, said in a statement Saturday.
{snip}
Jennifer Scholtes contributed to this report.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/16/ballroom-funding-senate-parliamentarian-00924612
Reposted by Chris Geidner
https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social
*******
Jen Bendery
@jbendery.bsky.social
There it is. The Senate parliamentarian rules the $1 billion for Trump's ballroom in the GOP's budget reconciliation bill violates the rules + is subject to 60 votes vs 51.
Via budget committee Dems:
10:17 PM · May 16, 2026
******
There it is. The Senate parliamentarian rules the billion for Trump's ballroom in the GOP's budget reconciliation bill violates the rules + is subject to 60 votes vs 51.
— Jen Bendery (@jbendery.bsky.social) 2026-05-17T02:17:07.182Z
Via budget committee Dems:
Volaris
(11,793 posts)They arent afraid to change that crap like Dems are
GB_RN
(3,586 posts)And IIRC, the Repukes did it when the Parliamentarian ruled against them. And then, McConnell then hired McDonough. Shes ruled against them on more than a couple occasions, with speculation that shed be fired.
Firing the Parliamentarian just for
reasons
would become just one more tit-for-tat that Im not sure even Thune would want to get into.
But, Ive been wrong in the past. Could be wrong now.
Bluetus
(3,068 posts)That way, if we get 51 Senate seats and control of the House, we can pass voting rights, Supreme Court reform and all the other things that the Jim Crow Party has been blocking.
debsy
(1,036 posts)I still cant bring myself to refer to him as potus.
So no legislation will pass for Dems until 2029 at the earliest.
J_William_Ryan
(3,565 posts)And when Republicans get 51 Senate seats and control of the House, they repeal voting rights, Supreme Court reform, and enact a fascist agenda supported by the Jim Crow party.
Karasu
(2,064 posts)Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
bmichaelh This message was self-deleted by its author.