Opinion Dems' future -- and democracy itself -- might depend on the DNC chairman pick - WaPo Rubin
As Democrats try to rebuild after the losses of 2024, there is lots of chatter about creating new organizations to work on communications or messaging or policy development. Democrats are effectively looking for workarounds to the DNC, which is no longer perceived as capable of meeting major challenges. Ask Democratic activists, donors and politicians about the DNCs race for a new chairman for early next year, and you likely will get an eye roll or a comment about the DNCs irrelevance.
Although the DNC hauls in massive donations, sets the presidential primary calendar and performs other functions, it was created in another era before the internet, MAGA and the explosion of dark money. The DNC doesnt need to be replaced, but it needs an overhaul. The DNC contest is about more than one party. In an era in which there is only one small-d democratic party, fashioning it into an instrument to effectively organize, message and combat disinformation is critical.
Former Maryland governor Martin OMalley, who announced his run, last won elective office in 2010; another potential choice, Rahm Emanuel, served in the first Obama term. If the DNC wants business as usual, any of these (or the stolid Minnesota chair Ken Martin, who also announced) would do. But none seems up to reinvigorating the DNC to make it central to the partys and democracys revival. If the DNC wants someone of a different generation who possesses the energy to shake up the party and to improve the partys standing in the critical Midwest then Wisconsin chair Ben Wikler is the obvious choice.
Wikler has not announced (nor agreed to talk to me about it) but I know of no other contender who has mastered online communication and organizing, and who can enlist influencers to reach apolitical voters all critical tasks among the many necessary to innovate a moribund party. An Atlantic magazine piece last year praised him (Wiklers talent is getting people to show up) for dragging the state party back from virtual irrelevance and dubbed him the man who has been hailed as the best state chair in the country. You would think the DNC would want to nationalize his organization, described as a comprehensive digital operation, an in-house research group, and a full-time staff of youth organizers.
(snip)
As a sunny Midwesterner from a nail-biter state rather than a deep blue enclave Wikler understands how reaching ticket-splitters and moderates would be a plus for a party perceived as heavy on coastal elites. One Democratic think tanker tells me, Harris won 14 of 19 states that touched the Atlantic or Pacific. She won 5 of 31 states that did not. A DNC chair from the interior of the country like Ben Wikler is a must.
More..
https://wapo.st/3Z97YdS
(free)
Passages
(1,311 posts)A disaster.
dutch777
(3,504 posts)They listened and gave voice to their local folks who paid attention to that and split their ticket when going all GOP would have been easy. What works in rural PA does not work in urban Detroit and on and on. We need better STRONG and LOCAL Dem operations informing the DNC, not DNC directives out of DC to locals. I believe we will win this back Congressional district by Congressional district or we won't win nationally for quite some time.
returnee
(317 posts)
didnt we lose Wisconsin?
And, for the record, I hate Rahm Emmanuel.
question everything
(48,971 posts)But I like the way she describes his suitability.
And, Wisconsin was the only one that voted R but retained the D senate seat
returnee
(317 posts)Theyre talking about the Dem chair in Wisconsin taking his place. My point was: If hes so good, why didnt we win there? If he couldnt help in his home state, hows he gonna help in others? Just asking.
lees1975
(6,027 posts)Consolation prize for losing to Lindsay Graham?
I'm not trying to be snarky here, by any means, but how in the world have we been able to hold what we have with the DNC being
"moribund" as the Wapo piece calls it? And what is it that seems to prevent us from being able to put together an ongoing, central campaign, addressing major issues and getting ahead of media coverage in an age where half of the cameras and microphones seem automatically programmed to follow Trump.
Blue_Tires
(56,230 posts)Of the responsibility always being on Dems to "save the world"?