Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hypocrite Mitch McConnell Complains That Democrats Are Too Partisan
McConnell, who has done more to undermine the integrity of the legislative branch than anyone in the last half-century, thinks judges who are unretiring after Trumps win lack integrity. Good grief!December 3, 2024
Senator Mitch McConnell is upset that two Democratic judges are reversing their decisions to retire, complaining Monday that this sort of partisan behavior undermines the integrity of the judiciary.
After Donald Trump was elected to his second term as president last month, two judges appointed by Democratic presidents changed their minds about retiring. U.S. District Judge Max Cogburn, appointed by President Obama, announced that he would remain active on the court for the Western District of North Carolina after previously saying he would move to part-time status in 2022.
Before Cogburn, U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley, a Clinton appointee, changed his mind about moving to senior status on the court for the Southern District of Ohio. To McConnell, this exposes bold Democratic blue where there should only be black robes.
Its hard to conclude this is anything other than open partisanship, the former Senate majority leader added, before offering a warning to Democrats: It would be especially alarming if either of the two circuit judges whose announced retirements created the vacancies currently pending before the Senatein Tennessee and North Carolinawere to follow suit.
https://newrepublic.com/post/188982/hypocrite-mitch-mcconnell-complains-democrats-partisan-confirming-federal-judges?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=SF_TNR
lol
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 493 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hypocrite Mitch McConnell Complains That Democrats Are Too Partisan (Original Post)
Passages
Dec 4
OP
Maddow Blog- McConnell is the wrong guy to whine about 'political games,' judicial nominations
LetMyPeopleVote
Dec 4
#6
Freddie
(9,725 posts)1. Repugs have no concept of hypocrisy
Its like breathing for them
Omnipresent
(6,416 posts)2. From what i learned from maga's, is that...
Mitch brings Democrats and Republicans together, in a bipartisan way. We all hate Mitch!
NotHardly
(1,284 posts)3. Amazing this duplicitous shite is still alive & talking like he matters.
milestogo
(18,071 posts)4. A shame he's not intelligent enough to be ironic.
The Roux Comes First
(1,578 posts)5. The Walking and Mumbling Exemplar of Total Absence of Integrity
You will be remembered by history, little turtle!
LetMyPeopleVote
(155,064 posts)6. Maddow Blog- McConnell is the wrong guy to whine about 'political games,' judicial nominations
As Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell complains about people playing political games with judicial nominations, irony weeps in the corner.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/mcconnell-wrong-guy-whine-political-games-judicial-nominations-rcna182685
The ad came to mind watching the latest developments on Capitol Hill. Newsweek reported:
This sort of partisan behavior undermines the integrity of the judiciary, McConnell said. Never, never before has a circuit judge un-retired after a presidential election. Its literally unprecedented.
Of course, those interested in playing political games with judicial nominations could very easily turn to the Kentucky Republican by saying, From you, all right? We learned it by watching you!
If, for example, McConnell seriously wants to have a conversation about whats literally unprecedented when it comes to the politicization of the federal judiciary, the Senate GOP leader should be interested in his own record.
It was in February 2016, for example, when then-Justice Antonin Scalia died unexpectedly. Then-President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, a center-left, compromise jurist whod received praise from Senate Republicans to fill the vacancy, which in turn opened the door to a historic opportunity to stop the high courts drift to the right......
Nearly four years later, as Election Day 2020 approached, McConnell and his GOP brethren scrambled to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court abandoning the principles Republicans pretended to care about four years earlier even as millions of Americans were taking advantage of early voting.
Not to put too fine a point on this, but McConnell has done more than anyone alive to politicize the judiciary. To the extent that anyone is playing political games with judicial nominations, they are merely following the playbook the Kentucky Republican authored years ago.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was called out by his Democratic colleague after the Kentucky senator complained about playing political games with judicial nominations. McConnell made the remark during a Senate floor session on Monday and said he was concerned that two U.S. circuit court judges who had plans to retire may not follow through with them in the wake of President-elect Donald Trumps victory in the 2024 U.S. election.
This sort of partisan behavior undermines the integrity of the judiciary, McConnell said. Never, never before has a circuit judge un-retired after a presidential election. Its literally unprecedented.
Of course, those interested in playing political games with judicial nominations could very easily turn to the Kentucky Republican by saying, From you, all right? We learned it by watching you!
If, for example, McConnell seriously wants to have a conversation about whats literally unprecedented when it comes to the politicization of the federal judiciary, the Senate GOP leader should be interested in his own record.
It was in February 2016, for example, when then-Justice Antonin Scalia died unexpectedly. Then-President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland, a center-left, compromise jurist whod received praise from Senate Republicans to fill the vacancy, which in turn opened the door to a historic opportunity to stop the high courts drift to the right......
Nearly four years later, as Election Day 2020 approached, McConnell and his GOP brethren scrambled to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court abandoning the principles Republicans pretended to care about four years earlier even as millions of Americans were taking advantage of early voting.
Not to put too fine a point on this, but McConnell has done more than anyone alive to politicize the judiciary. To the extent that anyone is playing political games with judicial nominations, they are merely following the playbook the Kentucky Republican authored years ago.
Passages
(1,311 posts)7. Exactly. He has always been a ruthless opportunist.
Skittles
(159,938 posts)8. says the guy who denied us a SUPREME COURT PICK
FUCK YOU MCCONNELL YOU FUCKING REPUKE HACK