Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
Related: About this forumThousands of California national forest campsites may close this summer amid federal budget freeze, report says
https://ktla.com/news/california/thousands-of-california-forest-campsites-may-close-this-summer-amid-federal-budget-freeze-report-says/
Nearly 4,000 campsites across California’s 18 national forests could close for part or all of the summer season as the U.S. Forest Service struggles with budget constraints following President Donald Trump’s federal spending freeze, according to a report by The New York Times.
The potential closures could impact visitor centers and backcountry trails at popular outdoor destinations such as Desolation Wilderness in Lake Tahoe and the Mount Whitney area.
An internal agency memo cited by the Times indicated that financial limitations may render some sites “unsafe” due to the inability to maintain them.
Forest Service employees who spoke with the publication noted that the funding freeze could significantly impact essential services, including human waste removal, trail maintenance, and search-and-rescue operations. Mount Whitney, known for frequent rescues and fatalities, may be particularly affected.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Thousands of California national forest campsites may close this summer amid federal budget freeze, report says (Original Post)
DBoon
Mar 6
OP
PoindexterOglethorpe
(27,591 posts)1. Well, gosh, who needs national forest campsites, anyway?
Or waste removal or search-and-rescue operations? I am sure that all the Republicans going to a national forest will happily do without such things.
quaint
(3,818 posts)3. They planned to hire a raker but they have already deported them.
Apologies for my sick humor.
wiggs
(8,155 posts)2. If no one goes to national forests, fewer people care about protecting them. Then TSF's friend come in
to 'increase use' by building hotels at the edge of Grand Canyon, log forests, sell off pieces, etc.
This is what they are doing to other kinds of federal facilities. Disable, wreck, destroy....then eliminate.