Idaho
Related: About this forumA young teen gives birth. Idaho's parental consent law snags her care.
The states new law requires parental permission for nearly all health care a minor receives. A 13-year-olds pregnancy gets caught up in the consequences.
Share
https://wapo.st/4hflJjq
On a warm Idaho afternoon, Aleah looks on as guests at her baby shower search for toy pacifiers in a scavenger hunt. (Rachel Woolf for The Washington Post)
By Karin Brulliard
October 21, 2024 at 6:00 a.m. EDT
McCALL, Idaho The patient, 36 weeks pregnant, was having mild but frequent contractions. She had come to the emergency room in this small lakeside town because she was new to the area and had no doctor. In most cases, physician Caitlin Gustafson would have begun a pelvic exam to determine whether labor had started. This time, she called the hospitals lawyers.
Mom-to-be Aleah was only 13 years old. And under a new Idaho law requiring parental consent for nearly all minors health care, Gustafson could be sued for treating her because the girl had been brought in by her great-aunt.
What followed were more than two frantic hours of trying to contact Aleahs mother, who was living in a car, and her grandmother, who was the teens legal guardian. The grandmother finally gave verbal consent for the exam from the Boise-area jail where she was incarcerated on drug charges. ... I was freaking out, said Anna Karren, the relative who had taken Aleah into her home just days before. What if the hospital couldnt reach the right person? They want guardianship papers, and I dont have them.
{snip}
Aleah, who is being identified by only her first name because of her age, had been moved around her whole life. That included spells in foster care and a halfway house, separated from her six siblings. She only briefly lived with her mother several years ago. Her father had long been absent. ... As for her babys teen dad, he now was in juvenile detention. The pair hadnt thought about contraception, Aleah conceded, and she never considered an abortion, which would have required a trip to another state anyway.
{snip}
Aleah talks with the doctor during her daughter's two-week checkup, while Anna Karren cuddles Oaklie in the corner. (Rachel Woolf for The Washington Post)
{snip}
Aleah shares a quiet moment in her new home with Oaklie. (Rachel Woolf for The Washington Post)
Share
https://wapo.st/4hflJjq
By Karin Brulliard
Karin Brulliard is a Colorado-based national reporter covering the American West. Previously, she was an international news editor; a foreign correspondent in South Africa, Pakistan and Israel; and a local reporter. Brulliard joined The Post in 2003. follow on X @karinbrulliard
ALBliberal
(2,879 posts)hlthe2b
(106,571 posts)Had she had options, would she have become pregnant? Would she have elected to maintain the pregnancy if she had options? Elected to keep the baby if she had options? Would she change her mind about ANY of this had she had the option of being educated as to what to expect?
All because patriarchal misogynistic males have decided FOR her--to give her ZERO options. My thoughts as to what the former DESERVE would not be printable here.
tulipsandroses
(6,233 posts)is the end all and be all. This family needed support and help. From Grandma, to mom and all the children. This child, and her child have been failed in so many ways.
Parental consent for medical treatment should not be necessary in these types of situations. What if the pregnancy was a result of incest, or mom's boyfriend? Mom doesn't want to give consent, then what?
Diamond_Dog
(34,991 posts)A woman of 13
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,897 posts)central scrutinizer
(12,441 posts)Once the baby is born, Republicans no longer give a shit. Tragic situation.
Diamond_Dog
(34,991 posts)In favor of teaching sex education in school. Like in 4th-5th grade.
The pair hadnt thought about contraception
Of course these red states make laws banning any kind of sex education other than teaching abstinence
..