Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Indiana
Related: About this forumIndiana asks Supreme Court to speed process so state can put its strict abortion law into effect
Hat tip, Joe.My.God.
IN Petitions SCOTUS On Parental Notice Abortion Law
July 15, 2022
July 15, 2022
Indiana asks Supreme Court to speed process so state can put its strict abortion law into effect
By Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter
Updated 11:40 PM ET, Thu July 14, 2022
(CNN) -- Indiana asked the Supreme Court Thursday to move quickly to officially transmit its opinion overturning Roe v. Wade to a federal appeals court so that the state can attempt to put its strict parental notification law into effect.
The Indiana law was enjoined by a district court in 2017 as a violation of Supreme Court precedent. But last month, after the Supreme Court invalidated Roe v. Wade in a case called Dobbs v. Jackson, the justices instructed the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit to take another look at the Indiana law pursuant to Dobbs. ... Under Supreme Court rules, the justices would set that process in motion by transmitting their mandate by July 25. In an emergency application filed with the court Thursday, however, the state asked the court to speed up the process.
The request comes as more than half the states are expected to bar or severely restrict abortion. Thirteen states have laws in place that are designed to be "triggered" and take effect if Roe no longer applies. In some states those laws have gone into effect, but others such as Texas, Idaho and Tennessee will wait for the Supreme Court mandate to come down. Those states have not yet asked the justices to expedite its judgment.
"Immediate transmittal of this Court's judgment is necessary to avoid inflicting further irreparable harm to the State of Indiana," the state's Solicitor General Thomas M. Fisher argued.
{snip}
By Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter
Updated 11:40 PM ET, Thu July 14, 2022
(CNN) -- Indiana asked the Supreme Court Thursday to move quickly to officially transmit its opinion overturning Roe v. Wade to a federal appeals court so that the state can attempt to put its strict parental notification law into effect.
The Indiana law was enjoined by a district court in 2017 as a violation of Supreme Court precedent. But last month, after the Supreme Court invalidated Roe v. Wade in a case called Dobbs v. Jackson, the justices instructed the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit to take another look at the Indiana law pursuant to Dobbs. ... Under Supreme Court rules, the justices would set that process in motion by transmitting their mandate by July 25. In an emergency application filed with the court Thursday, however, the state asked the court to speed up the process.
The request comes as more than half the states are expected to bar or severely restrict abortion. Thirteen states have laws in place that are designed to be "triggered" and take effect if Roe no longer applies. In some states those laws have gone into effect, but others such as Texas, Idaho and Tennessee will wait for the Supreme Court mandate to come down. Those states have not yet asked the justices to expedite its judgment.
"Immediate transmittal of this Court's judgment is necessary to avoid inflicting further irreparable harm to the State of Indiana," the state's Solicitor General Thomas M. Fisher argued.
{snip}
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Indiana asks Supreme Court to speed process so state can put its strict abortion law into effect (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2022
OP
lark
(24,289 posts)1. Fuck those forced birthers.
Fuck the RW christofascist senators who voted that states can restrict a woman's right to travel.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)2. I've read several posts this morning about abortion rights.
All the quotes in the articles come from men. Thomas, Peter, Mike
I am so sick of the He-Man Woman Haters Club.
Maybe the quotes about the coming abortion prisons will come from women.
bamagal62
(3,680 posts)3. I fu@king hate these people.
Every single one.