Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(9,711 posts)
Fri Jun 16, 2023, 09:44 AM Jun 2023

In rare 3-3 decision, Iowa Supreme Court declines to reinstate law largely banning abortion

In rare 3-3 decision, Iowa Supreme Court declines to reinstate law largely banning abortion


OPINION



DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Abortion will remain legal in Iowa after the state's high court declined Friday to reinstate a law that would have largely banned the procedure, rebuffing Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds and, for now, keeping the conservative state from joining others with strict abortion limits.

In a rare 3-3 split decision, the Iowa Supreme Court upheld a 2019 district court ruling that blocked the law. The latest ruling comes roughly a year after the same body — and the U.S. Supreme Court — determined that women do not have a fundamental constitutional right to abortion.

The blocked law bans abortions once cardiac activity can be detected, usually around six weeks of pregnancy and before many women know they are pregnant.

Writing for the three justices who denied the state's request to reinstate the law, Justice Thomas Waterman said granting that request would mean bypassing the legislature, changing the standard for how the court reviews laws and then dissolving an injunction.

“In our view it is legislating from the bench to take a statute that was moribund when it was enacted and has been enjoined for four years and then to put it in effect,” Waterman wrote.



8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In rare 3-3 decision, Iowa Supreme Court declines to reinstate law largely banning abortion (Original Post) In It to Win It Jun 2023 OP
Good that the Iowa Supreme Court blocked this ignorant change. raging moderate Jun 2023 #1
We all need to be educated more. LiberalFighter Jul 2023 #8
I am expecting Corporate Kim will call a special session of the legislature rurallib Jun 2023 #2
Time to fire up the "Out Of State Hate" buses again!! IA8IT Jun 2023 #4
I'm shocked that Mansfield and Waterman voted against Kimmy. rsdsharp Jun 2023 #3
you sure ain't the only one rurallib Jun 2023 #5
I am very disappointed in Matt McDermott, but I guess I shouldn't be. rsdsharp Jun 2023 #7
Iowa starting Line has a great article on this decision rurallib Jun 2023 #6

raging moderate

(4,510 posts)
1. Good that the Iowa Supreme Court blocked this ignorant change.
Fri Jun 16, 2023, 09:52 AM
Jun 2023

The change was based on ignorance of the actual physical facts. What is called "around six weeks of pregnancy" is actually only about FOUR weeks of pregnancy, since it has been customary to start the count at the first day of the woman's previous period, but we now know that ovulation and fertilization do not occur until two weeks later. Also, recent studies show that the "cardiac activity" was not actually heart activity, and that there is no heart at that point. We need to spread these facts, because many people are afraid to allow abortion at a point when they think the embryo has all these functioning organs and sentience.

LiberalFighter

(53,504 posts)
8. We all need to be educated more.
Mon Jul 17, 2023, 04:12 PM
Jul 2023

I doubt the general public has any idea about the ovulation and fertilization process. I would say that unless the person is an OBGYN I doubt anyone has an idea. Even some of them likely don't.

This needs to be publicized more.

rurallib

(63,260 posts)
2. I am expecting Corporate Kim will call a special session of the legislature
Fri Jun 16, 2023, 09:57 AM
Jun 2023

to ban abortions.

I bet she is really pissed off at the SC right now.
She picked 5 of the 7 and Branstad picked the other 2

IA8IT

(5,913 posts)
4. Time to fire up the "Out Of State Hate" buses again!!
Fri Jun 16, 2023, 11:54 AM
Jun 2023

We got judges that need to be judged evil and voted out..... Stinking Louie Gohmert, Steve King, and repubicans started a stampede of the stupid ejecting three supreme court after same sex marriage ruling.

I want my Iowa back!!

rurallib

(63,260 posts)
5. you sure ain't the only one
Fri Jun 16, 2023, 01:41 PM
Jun 2023

I stopped in the middle of my tracks when I heard this on the radio

rurallib

(63,260 posts)
6. Iowa starting Line has a great article on this decision
Fri Jun 16, 2023, 02:33 PM
Jun 2023

Corporate Kimmy is pissed off:

“To say that today’s lack of action by the Iowa Supreme Court is a disappointment is an understatement,” Reynolds said in a release, adding she believed there was “no fundamental right to abortion” in Iowa or US law.

“But the fight is not over,” she continued, noting she and others were “reviewing our options in preparation for continuing the fight.”


https://iowastartingline.com/2023/06/16/iowa-lawmakers-react-to-decision-that-keeps-abortion-legal/.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Iowa»In rare 3-3 decision, Iow...