Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 02:31 AM Mar 2012

Should Mass Dems vote for Santorum in Primary?

Just asking the question.

Wouldn't it be nice that the state where Romney held his only elected office ever got defeated in the Primary next week, March 6?

Of course, none of us support Santorum, but can we Dems show up and vote Romney down here where he was actually elected to be Governor ?

Wouldn't that make a statement to the nation?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. It's not an open primary--people would have to declare a change in affiliation.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 03:02 AM
Mar 2012

I've already voted as I won't be in the state on election day (I feel bad, too because I give rides to the polls for quite a few people and I'm not sure my surrogates will take care of all my "customers" even though I've extracted a dozen promises). I don't know how big the turnout will be at this primary...we'll see.

 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
3. But if one is unaffiliated...
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 03:22 AM
Mar 2012

Massachusetts
Mass. Gen. Laws ch.53 §37
Affiliated voters must vote in the primary of their party; however, unaffiliated voters may vote in either primary.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. We do have a number of "unaffiliated" voters in MA, and that number grows larger every year.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 08:07 AM
Mar 2012

AndyTiedye

(23,533 posts)
2. No. It is a Dangerous Game, and it is Unnecessary
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 03:03 AM
Mar 2012

Obama can beat Mittens or Santorum, as long as the election is not hopelessly rigged — but what if it is?

We all thought dubya was unelectable in 2000, remember?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
6. But Andy, Dubya was "elected" five to four in 2000....we had nothing to do with it.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 08:09 AM
Mar 2012

And some of us still resent that "judicial activism" on the part of those miserable bastards!

AndyTiedye

(23,533 posts)
9. You Think That Couldn't Happen Again?
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 02:45 PM
Mar 2012

The Supreme Court today is far more partisan than the one that selected **.

Yes, we'd resent it, again. We'd protest again. So what?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
10. Well, you said "We thought Dubya was unelectable" and he was.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 06:44 PM
Mar 2012

What he was, was selectable--that's a horse of a different color....

Loudmxr

(1,405 posts)
4. No. There is an old saying...
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 03:33 AM
Mar 2012

It is better to vote for what you want and not get it

Than to vote for what you don't want .. and get it.

I wish I could who the quote is attributed to. I want to say Eugene Debbs but I could be wrong.

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
7. No.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 08:44 AM
Mar 2012

Last edited Thu Mar 1, 2012, 10:42 AM - Edit history (1)

This is a horrible meme floating around, that dems should vote for Santorum because he would be easier to beat. Do you really want to be responsible for a flood of santorum in the White House, should he actually, by some twist of fate, end up winning the general election?

I didn't think so...

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
11. Thought about it...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 10:50 AM
Mar 2012

I'm unaffiliated, so I could have, but there was a bit of drama with the FedEx guy getting stuck out at the end of my driveway and almost knocking over my mailbox, Mr Pipi was out, and I can't drive the pickup with the plow on it.

I wasn't sure I wanted to chance getting stuck myself just for the sake of making a point, so...

oh well

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Should Mass Dems vote for...