Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Minnesota
Related: About this forumLawsuit challenges Minnesota abortion access in federal court
But didn't all the Republicans running in Minnesota this past fall tell us it wasn't an issue here?
There is a lot of convoluted reasoning in this & a lot more at the link, that is worth reading.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2024/11/25/lawsuit-challenges-minnesota-abortion-access-in-federal-court
Through prior court rulings and legislative actions, Minnesota has among the most accommodating laws granting access to abortion. A lawsuit filed late last week in federal court seeks to upend those laws.
It was brought by a group of plaintiffs that includes women who have had abortions they say werent voluntary, anti-abortion organizations and crisis pregnancy centers, which counsel clients against having abortions. They argue that Minnesotas process for abortion consent is too loose and that its legal protections for medical providers are too lenient.
For decades, New Jersey-based attorney Harold Cassidy has brought lawsuits on behalf of people who he has said regretted having abortions.
He said Minnesota is in violation of the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitutions 14th Amendment because the state acting in concert with abortion providers illegally terminated the pregnant persons parental rights through involuntary and unwanted abortions...
...ill Hasday, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Minnesota Law School, said during an interview Monday on Minnesota Now that the plaintiffs want abortion to be treated as a termination of parental rights, rather than a medical procedure, and therefore subject to the same rules and regulations.
The plaintiffs in the suit want to argue that the same constitutional requirements have to apply to abortion and that Minnesotas laws legalizing abortion are unconstitutional because they permit the termination of parental rights before a child is born, without a court hearing, and without a court finding clear and convincing evidence of abuse and neglect.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 500 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawsuit challenges Minnesota abortion access in federal court (Original Post)
dflprincess
Nov 26
OP
2naSalit
(93,098 posts)1. FFS!
I hope that one is laughed out of court if it is granted a hearing.
sboatcar
(567 posts)2. I'm not going to diminish anyone's decisions about anything
but just because you did something and then you regret it isn't a reason to prevent anyone else from making the same decision. That logic just doesn't work