Proposed bill could allow people to kill without proving self-defense

[xocetaceans]

Proposed bill could allow people to kill without proving self-defense
Xcaret Nunez

JEFFERSON CITY — Legislation that would drastically alter Missouri’s self-defense laws was debated by a Senate committee Tuesday.

Sen. Eric Burlison’s Senate Bill 666 would alter the requirement for someone to prove they used physical or deadly force in self-defense. If passed, the bill would move the burden onto the prosecutor to prove the defendant’s actions were not in self-defense.

Burlison, R-Battlefield, said the purpose of the bill is to strengthen the already existing "castle doctrine," which allows individuals to use force in defense of themselves, their family and their property.

"And yet still, there are those who would seek to prosecute law abiding Missourians whose only "crime" is they were trying to defend themselves and or their family members," he said.

...

(https://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/state_news/proposed-bill-could-allow-people-to-kill-without-proving-self-defense/article_4656e642-83a5-11ec-bb28-23aa50d9e2b5.html)

SB 666
Modifies provisions on self-defense

Sponsor: Burlison
LR Number: 3356S.01I
Committee: Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety
Last Action: 2/1/2022 - Hearing Conducted S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee
Journal Page:
Title:
Calendar Position:
Effective Date: August 28, 2022



Current Bill Summary

SB 666 - PRESUMPTION OF REASONABLENESS (Section 563.031)

Under current law, the defendant has the burden to prove he or she reasonably believed physical or deadly force was necessary to protect him or herself or a third person.

This act provides that there shall be a presumption of reasonableness that the defendant believed such force was necessary to defend him or herself or a third person.

IMMUNITY FROM LIABILITY (Section 563.085)

This act provides that a person who uses or threatens to use force in self-defense is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless such force was used against a law enforcement officer who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the person reasonably knew or should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer.

Additionally, a law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use or threatened use of force, but the agency may not arrest the person for using or threatening to use force unless the agency determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used or threatened was unlawful.

This act provides that the defendant can raise a claim of self-defense during a pre-trial hearing in either a criminal or civil case which shall shift the burden on the party seeking to overcome the immunity by proof of clear and convincing evidence.

Finally, this act repeals provisions relating to civil remedies that are unaffected by criminal provisions of self-defense law.

MARY GRACE PRINGLE

Amendments
No Amendments Found.

(https://www.senate.mo.gov/22info/bts_web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=71259696)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It seems they found an appropriate number for the bill.

[Karadeniz]

1. Jesus!

[I_UndergroundPanther]

2. The irony makes my nose hair burn

Pro murder..SB Bill 666

[cbabe]

3. Until the first black man shoots a white man. As Blacks are actually threatened by whites in reality

[czarjak]

4. Open Season Expansion