Vote Sleuth in NC

[littlemissmartypants]

Snip~~~

About

We had been following @mikefarb1 with great interest on Twitter. He and a crowd-sourced team of crack data analysts have been finding some very interesting peculiarities in precinct-level election statistics from recent elections. His website is here.

https://www.unhackthevote.com

At some point @mikefarb1 posted a link to an article about a statistician’s denied request to audit Kansas voting machines based on some statistically anomalous results she had found when looking at precinct-level election returns vs. precinct size.

This led us to some extremely alarming papers by statisticians who have noticed odd-looking data when they tally precinct-level votes starting with the smallest precincts and moving to the largest.

We found this quite shocking. Their results looked bizarre:
How Trustworthy are Electronic Voting Systems in the US? (Beth Clarkson)
Republican Primary Election 2012 Results – Amazing Statistical Anomalies

So we decided to investigate this ourselves.

This website is a record of our ongoing work.

Many hugs of gratitude to Milena and Jenny for hard work well done, and to erika, for editing.

~~~Snip.

http://www.votesleuth.org/about/

More here:

http://www.votesleuth.org/

For those who love statistical analysis.

♡lmsp

[littlemissmartypants]

1. Thanks for the views and recs ♡ lmsp

[L. Coyote]

2. Vote Sleuth is either a deception or they have no clue about what they are saying.

For those who understand statistical analysis, that domain is ridiculously flawed. They know nothing about statistics.

[littlemissmartypants]

3. Thanks for the reply, L. Coyote.

All facts welcome here.

♡lmsp