Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The NCGAs New Class-Size Bill Is Loaded With a Bunch of Other Crap Youre Not Going to Like
Basically, the GOP NC Legislature's class-size and pre-k fix are tied to taking the ACP $58M away from Cooper and limiting his power over Elections board . . .
https://www.indyweek.com/news/archives/2018/02/08/the-ncgas-new-class-size-bill-is-loaded-with-a-bunch-of-other-crap-youre-not-going-to-like
. . .See, HB 90 does a lot more than address class sizes. There are also two provisions Governor Cooper and legislative Democrats are almost certain to oppose—which the Republicans can then use as a political cudgel, accusing them of being anti-education.
This is the North Carolina General Assembly, after all. You didn’t think this thing would be neat and tidy, did you?
The first has to do with Cooper’s Atlantic Coast Pipeline mitigation fund—the $58 million the developers of the controversial natural-gas pipeline paid the state to set up a fund to mitigate any environmental damage. The legislature’s bill would essentially take that money out of the governor’s control. No longer would it be used for mitigation; now it would be routed to school systems in the counties through which the ACP runs.
The second—and probably the ultimate poison pill for Democrats—is the latest salvo in Cooper’s war with the legislature over the constitution of the state’s election board. Last month, you’ll recall, the N.C. Supreme Court struck down the legislature’s reconfiguration of the board, preserving Cooper’s control of the body instead of evenly dividing eight seats among Republicans and Democrats, as the legislature wished. Under the old system—which the Supreme Court effectively reinstated—the governor’s party controlled three of the board’s five seats.
This ordeal has gone on since before Cooper took office. Soon after the 2016 election, the legislature—with the lame-duck Pat McCrory still in the governor’s chair—passed a series of laws designed to strip the governor of his power, including a remake of the elections board. Cooper sued, and a state court sided with him. So the legislature quickly tweaked the bill and passed it again. And Cooper sued again. Because of the legal wrangling, and because Cooper refused to appoint members, the legislature’s eight-member Bipartisan Board of Elections & Ethics Enforcement sat vacant.
With the Supreme Court having weighed in against them, Republicans are now taking a third bite at the apple.
The newest rewrite adds a ninth member to the board—an unaffiliated voter—in addition to four Dems and four Republicans. As before, the governor would make the appointments based on lists provided by the state parties, and for the final seat, the board members would give the governor a list of unaffiliated or minor-party options to choose from. And now, according to the legislation: “The Governor shall make all appointments promptly upon receipt of the list of nominees from each nominating entity and in no instance shall appoint later than 30 days after receipt of the list.”
This is the North Carolina General Assembly, after all. You didn’t think this thing would be neat and tidy, did you?
The first has to do with Cooper’s Atlantic Coast Pipeline mitigation fund—the $58 million the developers of the controversial natural-gas pipeline paid the state to set up a fund to mitigate any environmental damage. The legislature’s bill would essentially take that money out of the governor’s control. No longer would it be used for mitigation; now it would be routed to school systems in the counties through which the ACP runs.
The second—and probably the ultimate poison pill for Democrats—is the latest salvo in Cooper’s war with the legislature over the constitution of the state’s election board. Last month, you’ll recall, the N.C. Supreme Court struck down the legislature’s reconfiguration of the board, preserving Cooper’s control of the body instead of evenly dividing eight seats among Republicans and Democrats, as the legislature wished. Under the old system—which the Supreme Court effectively reinstated—the governor’s party controlled three of the board’s five seats.
This ordeal has gone on since before Cooper took office. Soon after the 2016 election, the legislature—with the lame-duck Pat McCrory still in the governor’s chair—passed a series of laws designed to strip the governor of his power, including a remake of the elections board. Cooper sued, and a state court sided with him. So the legislature quickly tweaked the bill and passed it again. And Cooper sued again. Because of the legal wrangling, and because Cooper refused to appoint members, the legislature’s eight-member Bipartisan Board of Elections & Ethics Enforcement sat vacant.
With the Supreme Court having weighed in against them, Republicans are now taking a third bite at the apple.
The newest rewrite adds a ninth member to the board—an unaffiliated voter—in addition to four Dems and four Republicans. As before, the governor would make the appointments based on lists provided by the state parties, and for the final seat, the board members would give the governor a list of unaffiliated or minor-party options to choose from. And now, according to the legislation: “The Governor shall make all appointments promptly upon receipt of the list of nominees from each nominating entity and in no instance shall appoint later than 30 days after receipt of the list.”