Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(117,261 posts)
Sun Feb 10, 2019, 07:35 AM Feb 2019

Now or later? Disagreements emerge over how quickly to act on new North Dakota ethics rules

BISMARCK — Lobbyists who opposed adding anti-corruption language to the North Dakota constitution are urging lawmakers to quickly define the new rules to clear up any confusion about proper Capitol conduct, while the ballot measure’s supporters seek a slower approach.

The stark differences over implementing Measure 1 have been on display in the initial hearings convened at the state Capitol, where lawmakers have wrestled with clarifying the terms that voters recently carved into the state constitution.

“There’s great consternation about this,” said Fargo Democratic Sen. Tim Mathern, the sponsor of an implementation bill introduced with the support of Measure 1 backers. “And the best way to deal with that is to give people an opportunity to vent and to express their views.”

While Mathern maintains legislators should deliberate during the interim period between sessions because some constitutional provisions don’t go into effect right away, others said acting this session will give more immediate clarity to the public and policymakers.

Read more: https://www.inforum.com/news/government-and-politics/966676-Now-or-later-Disagreements-emerge-over-how-quickly-to-act-on-new-North-Dakota-ethics-rules

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»North Dakota»Now or later? Disagreemen...