Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(117,261 posts)
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 05:38 AM Dec 2016

Taking on income inequality with a CEO pay tax

It remains to be seen whether President-elect Donald Trump will make rising income inequality a priority when he takes office in January. At least, his tax plan indirectly aims to ease inequality by making wealthy Americans “pay their fair share.”

In Portland, Oregon, lawmakers aren’t holding their collective breath. In a move that made international headlines, Portland’s City Council voted earlier in December to approve a first-of-its-kind tax on public companies that pay their chief executive officers more 100 times their median workers’ pay.

According to Portland Commissioner Steve Novick, the tax aims to address growing income inequality by targeting “the phenomenon of outrageous CEO pay.” Some economists, said Novick, argue that escalating CEO pay is more than just a symbol of income disparity in the U.S. but has actually contributed to the nagging problem. Novick sponsored the ordinance authorizing the new tax.

“If we can do something to roll back the explosion in CEO pay, then we can do something about the explosion of economic inequality in general,” he said.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/portland-oregon-ceo-tax-takes-on-income-inequality/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
3. Me neither, but in many cases it is the bulk of CEO compensation...
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 06:06 AM
Dec 2016

And there's performance bonuses, where additional taxation could be counter-productive.

At any rate, it's a cool sound bite for a complicated situation that no politician ever feels obligated to explain or put into effect

 

Johnathan146

(141 posts)
4. So if a CEO makes too much, a business ends up paying .2% additional tax
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 07:47 AM
Dec 2016

My predition is that they just raise prices .2%, and instead of the corporation making less the citizens of portland just end up paying more for goods.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Oregon»Taking on income inequali...