Pennsylvania
Related: About this forumKraft Heinz to pay $62M to settle securities violations
Kraft Heinz Co. has agreed to pay the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission a civil penalty of $62 million for what regulators called a multiyear expense management scheme meant to mislead investors about how much cost the company was cutting after its 2015 merger.
The settlement, which the food giant announced in a public filing, also calls out Eduardo Pelleissone, former COO and global head of operations, for his role in the scheme, saying he created a high-pressure environment to show that the company was reaching increasingly unrealistic cost targets. The SEC also said he allowed the reporting of inaccurate financial statements.
Mr. Pelleissone had served as head of operations at Heinz before the merger that combined Pittsburghs H.J. Heinz Co. with Kraft Foods Group. He left the company in 2019 and, according to the settlement, will be fined more than $300,000.
Kraft Heinz, in the run-up to the merger, touted the cost-cutting potential of the deal.
Read more: https://www.post-gazette.com/business/money/2021/09/03/Kraft-Heinz-to-pay-62-million-to-settle-securities-violations-SEC-merger/stories/202109030113
OAITW r.2.0
(28,518 posts)flying_wahini
(8,043 posts)Somehow that doesnt seem like enough of a fine to me.
FakeNoose
(35,901 posts)From the OP:
The SEC said the companys actions artificially inflated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, a metric used by investors to judge operating performance.
The motivation to show drastic year-over-year cost savings was partly personal executives bonuses were heavily reliant on this metric.
They were all in on it because they all got their yearly bonuses.