Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Woman buried as Jane Doe and exhumed for DNA can't be reburied: Loudoun Co. board pushes to change law
Woman buried as Jane Doe and exhumed for DNA can’t be reburied: Loudoun Co. board pushes to change law
Neal Augenstein | naugenstein@wtop.com
November 20, 2024, 8:18 AM
In 1973, the body of a woman in her 20s was discovered in Loudoun County, Virginia. ... At the time, the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office said that she had been killed, but they were not able to identify her body. ... “They did not know who she was,” said Board of Supervisors Chair Phyllis Randall in a Nov. 7 meeting. “She was buried as a Jane Doe, and that was legal to do that 25 years ago, to bury someone as a Jane Doe.”
Recently, the sheriff’s office got the court’s permission to exhume Jane Doe’s remains to use improved DNA technology to attempt identifying her. ... “The medical examiner’s office was able to get viable DNA from her,” said Lt. Col. Christopher Sawyer, of the sheriff’s office. “Obviously, there’s not a direct match sample, since they weren’t taking DNA samples back in 1973, so working through genealogy takes time.” ... However, after changes in the law, it’s now illegal to bury an unidentified person — and Jane Doe’s final resting place, for now, is in limbo.
“She cannot be legally be reinterred — she is now in the regional coroner’s office in Manassas,” said Randall. “They cannot reinter her, although we did exhume her after 25 years.” ... As the sheriff’s department continues their work to find out who Jane Doe was, and ultimately determine who killed her, there are concerns about treating the deceased with respect. ... “In the interim time, before we have her identified, we really don’t feel like it’s an appropriate or respectful situation to just have her body in the morgue,” Sawyer said. “We’ve worked with a funeral home, to have a headstone, a service, and everything else to give her the respectful burial that she deserves.”
However, he continued, “The Chief Medical Examiner said, ‘Well, you can’t have the body, because we don’t have a name.'” ... For now, Randall has asked staff to work on adding a policy statement to the county’s 2025 Legislative Program. Those changes to the law would allow bodies that have been exhumed for the purposes of DNA-gathering or investigation to be reinterred, even if they still can’t be identified. ... The board will vote on this addition to the legislative program in the next few weeks.
Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.
© 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
Neal Augenstein
Neal Augenstein has been a general assignment reporter with WTOP since 1997. He says he looks forward to coming to work every day, even though that means waking up at 3:30 a.m.
naugenstein@wtop.com
@AugensteinWTOP
Neal Augenstein | naugenstein@wtop.com
November 20, 2024, 8:18 AM
In 1973, the body of a woman in her 20s was discovered in Loudoun County, Virginia. ... At the time, the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office said that she had been killed, but they were not able to identify her body. ... “They did not know who she was,” said Board of Supervisors Chair Phyllis Randall in a Nov. 7 meeting. “She was buried as a Jane Doe, and that was legal to do that 25 years ago, to bury someone as a Jane Doe.”
Recently, the sheriff’s office got the court’s permission to exhume Jane Doe’s remains to use improved DNA technology to attempt identifying her. ... “The medical examiner’s office was able to get viable DNA from her,” said Lt. Col. Christopher Sawyer, of the sheriff’s office. “Obviously, there’s not a direct match sample, since they weren’t taking DNA samples back in 1973, so working through genealogy takes time.” ... However, after changes in the law, it’s now illegal to bury an unidentified person — and Jane Doe’s final resting place, for now, is in limbo.
“She cannot be legally be reinterred — she is now in the regional coroner’s office in Manassas,” said Randall. “They cannot reinter her, although we did exhume her after 25 years.” ... As the sheriff’s department continues their work to find out who Jane Doe was, and ultimately determine who killed her, there are concerns about treating the deceased with respect. ... “In the interim time, before we have her identified, we really don’t feel like it’s an appropriate or respectful situation to just have her body in the morgue,” Sawyer said. “We’ve worked with a funeral home, to have a headstone, a service, and everything else to give her the respectful burial that she deserves.”
However, he continued, “The Chief Medical Examiner said, ‘Well, you can’t have the body, because we don’t have a name.'” ... For now, Randall has asked staff to work on adding a policy statement to the county’s 2025 Legislative Program. Those changes to the law would allow bodies that have been exhumed for the purposes of DNA-gathering or investigation to be reinterred, even if they still can’t be identified. ... The board will vote on this addition to the legislative program in the next few weeks.
Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.
© 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
Neal Augenstein
Neal Augenstein has been a general assignment reporter with WTOP since 1997. He says he looks forward to coming to work every day, even though that means waking up at 3:30 a.m.
naugenstein@wtop.com
@AugensteinWTOP
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
