Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(123,460 posts)
Tue Sep 5, 2017, 09:24 PM Sep 2017

(in km/hr) Why even a record-breaking hurricane can't hit Category 6

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/technology/hurricane-category-saffir-simpson-1.4275997

"SNIP.......


Irma is currently listed as a Category 5 hurricane, but some articles circulating on the internet claim it could become the first to reach Category 6.

But those articles are fake.

How do we know? Because the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale, which categorizes hurricanes' destructiveness based on their wind speeds, ranges from 1 to 5.

Category 3 hurricanes and above are considered major, and the worst storms are Category 5, encompassing all hurricanes with sustained winds of 252 km/h or more.

When a Category 5 storm hits, you can expect "catastrophic damage," according to a National Hurricane Center backgrounder. "Most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks or months," it says, as the winds will destroy many homes, collapsing roofs, walls, trees and power lines, causing power outages that last for weeks or months.

But why is there no Category 6?

"Because once you say catastrophic and there's near complete damage, why do you need a 6?" says Dennis Feltgen, a spokesperson for the National Hurricane Center.


.......SNIP"
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(in km/hr) Why even a record-breaking hurricane can't hit Category 6 (Original Post) applegrove Sep 2017 OP
Need 6 because a cat 5s destruction is not absolute devastation Iwasthere Sep 2017 #1
Maybe, maybe not. defacto7 Sep 2017 #3
Here's why central scrutinizer Sep 2017 #2

Iwasthere

(3,376 posts)
1. Need 6 because a cat 5s destruction is not absolute devastation
Tue Sep 5, 2017, 09:52 PM
Sep 2017

Concrete buildings will mostly still be standing.

defacto7

(13,628 posts)
3. Maybe, maybe not.
Tue Sep 5, 2017, 10:35 PM
Sep 2017

It depends on the structure and foundation. Since those are unknown, the term near maximum damage is still the most logical. There are brick and concrete buildings that could stand 350 mph, there are those that you can push over by hand. They mostly determine damage by what happens to things that have tolerances that don't change much or don't vary.
With tornadoes EF5, maximum damage, is any tornado over 200 mph, with hurricanes it's anything with sustained winds over 156. A 300 mph tornado doesn't do more damage than a 200 mph one does.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Canada»(in km/hr) Why even a re...