Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

United Kingdom

whathehell

(29,845 posts) Sat Jan 29, 2022, 12:57 PM Jan 2022

Prince Andrew & his Teddy bear collection.

Oh my!

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2022/01/prince-andrew-maid-teddy-bear-collection-arranged-very-particular

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Prince Andrew & his Teddy bear collection. (Original Post) whathehell Jan 2022 OP

Odd, but harmless compared to his other alleged transgressions. Ocelot II Jan 2022 #1

Every once in a while I read something that... ret5hd Jan 2022 #2

I know.. whathehell Jan 2022 #3

The fact that a maid has to arrange the teddy bears means that Ocelot II Jan 2022 #4

To be honest.. whathehell Jan 2022 #5

Ocelot II

(121,236 posts)

1. Odd, but harmless compared to his other alleged transgressions.

Reply to whathehell (Original post)

Sat Jan 29, 2022, 01:01 PM

Jan 2022

ret5hd

(21,320 posts)

2. Every once in a while I read something that...

Reply to whathehell (Original post)

Sat Jan 29, 2022, 01:01 PM

Jan 2022

I dunno...just makes me feel more "normal"...like, "at least I don't do THAT!"

whathehell

(29,845 posts)

3. I know..

Reply to ret5hd (Reply #2)

Sat Jan 29, 2022, 01:05 PM

Jan 2022

Isn't it great?

Ocelot II

(121,236 posts)

4. The fact that a maid has to arrange the teddy bears means that

Reply to whathehell (Original post)

Sat Jan 29, 2022, 01:26 PM

Jan 2022

Andy must be doing something with them to disarrange them. That's the weird part.

whathehell

(29,845 posts)

5. To be honest..

Reply to Ocelot II (Reply #4)

Sat Jan 29, 2022, 01:52 PM

Jan 2022

I find ALL of it weird.

Reply to this discussion