Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Congress
Related: About this forumHouse panel approves contempt resolution against Clinton aide Bryan Pagliano
Source: Washington Post
House panel approves contempt resolution against Clinton aide
By Elise Viebeck September 22 at 11:20 AM
A House committee on Thursday began the process of holding a former Hillary Clinton aide in contempt of Congress for his failure to appear before the panel under subpoena.
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee approved a contempt of Congress resolution by a party-line vote of 19 to 15 because the former State Department aide, Bryan Pagliano, did not attend its 10 a.m. hearing to testify about his role in setting up Clintons private email server in 2009.
Subpoenas are not optional, Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) said. This committee cannot perform its duty if subpoenas are ignored, so we are left with no choice but to consider this resolution.
Pagliano failed to attend a related hearing on Sept. 13 to answer questions about Clintons record-keeping, noting he previously invoked his constitutional right against self-incrimination when asked about the same topic by the House Select Committee on Benghazi.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By Elise Viebeck September 22 at 11:20 AM
A House committee on Thursday began the process of holding a former Hillary Clinton aide in contempt of Congress for his failure to appear before the panel under subpoena.
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee approved a contempt of Congress resolution by a party-line vote of 19 to 15 because the former State Department aide, Bryan Pagliano, did not attend its 10 a.m. hearing to testify about his role in setting up Clintons private email server in 2009.
Subpoenas are not optional, Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) said. This committee cannot perform its duty if subpoenas are ignored, so we are left with no choice but to consider this resolution.
Pagliano failed to attend a related hearing on Sept. 13 to answer questions about Clintons record-keeping, noting he previously invoked his constitutional right against self-incrimination when asked about the same topic by the House Select Committee on Benghazi.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/09/21/hosue-panel-expected-to-move-forward-with-contempt-resolution-against-clinton-aide/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1443 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House panel approves contempt resolution against Clinton aide Bryan Pagliano (Original Post)
Eugene
Sep 2016
OP
shraby
(21,946 posts)1. That's strange, the subpoenas WERE optional during the bush II reign of terror. Many never
answered them at all.
unblock
(54,197 posts)2. He said he would only invoke the fifth, so it was all for show
They just wanted the spectacle of someone they could tie to Hillary repeatedly invoking the fifth on tv.
But of course, we can't investigate trump for tax evasion, bribery, fraud, or Rico violations ... That would be "political"
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)3. 78.5% of us have contempt of Congress.
That idiot Chaffetz managed to find one more.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/congressional_job_approval-903.html
I'd vote for the worst 'blue dog Democrat' out there to get rid of Chaffetz and his ilk, and end this psychotic fixation on hounding Hillary!
sinkingfeeling
(53,129 posts)4. Didn't several in the GW Bush administration ignore subpoenas?