Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
Related: About this forumU.S. Supreme Court poised to give companies new power to sue over strikes
Hat tip, SCOTUSblog
WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Friday, Oct. 21
By SCOTUSblog
on Oct 21, 2022 at 9:49 am
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.
Heres the Friday morning read:
Should Supreme Court Justices Have Term Limits? That Would Be Fine, Breyer Says at Harvard IOP Forum (Emily L. Ding, Azusa M. Lippit, and Thomas J. Mete, The Harvard Crimson)
The Chief Justice Who Isnt (Matt Ford, The New Republic)
Activists push for disclosure of clients and income of judges spouses (Hailey Fuchs, Politico)
ACLU asks supreme court to overturn Arkansas anti-boycott law against Israel (Chris McGreal, The Guardian)
U.S. Supreme Court poised to give companies new power to sue over strikes (Hassan Kanu, Reuters)
{snip}
Recommended Citation: SCOTUSblog , The morning read for Friday, Oct. 21, SCOTUSblog (Oct. 21, 2022, 9:49 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/10/the-morning-read-for-friday-oct-21/
The morning read for Friday, Oct. 21
By SCOTUSblog
on Oct 21, 2022 at 9:49 am
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.
Heres the Friday morning read:
Should Supreme Court Justices Have Term Limits? That Would Be Fine, Breyer Says at Harvard IOP Forum (Emily L. Ding, Azusa M. Lippit, and Thomas J. Mete, The Harvard Crimson)
The Chief Justice Who Isnt (Matt Ford, The New Republic)
Activists push for disclosure of clients and income of judges spouses (Hailey Fuchs, Politico)
ACLU asks supreme court to overturn Arkansas anti-boycott law against Israel (Chris McGreal, The Guardian)
U.S. Supreme Court poised to give companies new power to sue over strikes (Hassan Kanu, Reuters)
{snip}
Recommended Citation: SCOTUSblog , The morning read for Friday, Oct. 21, SCOTUSblog (Oct. 21, 2022, 9:49 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/10/the-morning-read-for-friday-oct-21/
6 minute read | October 20, 2022 | 1:36 PM EDT | Last Updated 4 days ago
U.S. Supreme Court poised to give companies new power to sue over strikes
By Hassan Kanu
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court appears set to deliver on another longstanding conservative policy goal in its first major labor law case this term, with a ruling that could hobble workers right to strike, amid a resurgence of worker organizing and a cost-of-living crisis.
The justices decided on Oct. 4 to consider whether businesses can sue unions in state court for the economic consequences of strikes and other employee protests, like spoiled products.
{snip}
U.S. Supreme Court poised to give companies new power to sue over strikes
By Hassan Kanu
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court appears set to deliver on another longstanding conservative policy goal in its first major labor law case this term, with a ruling that could hobble workers right to strike, amid a resurgence of worker organizing and a cost-of-living crisis.
The justices decided on Oct. 4 to consider whether businesses can sue unions in state court for the economic consequences of strikes and other employee protests, like spoiled products.
{snip}
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court poised to give companies new power to sue over strikes (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2022
OP
Bluethroughu
(5,869 posts)1. Let's be clear the fascists are trying to bring back indentured servitude.
Workers striking is a First Amendment right.
They don't have to work for less pay, poor working conditions or safety concerns. They make their grievances known to the employer and they negotiate the terms of employment. If the employer is unreasonable they strike. They notify that employer before the strike happens, if the employer chooses not to rectify the issue, it's on them!
Any other way, will be a lead up to indentured servitude.
Bev54
(11,921 posts)2. Corporate interests are the interest of the Supreme court rw judges.