Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Labor News & Commentary December 2, NLRB rules that Starbucks' dress code violates labor law & more
https://onlabor.org/december-2-2024/
By Holden Hopkins. Holden Hopkins is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News & Commentary, new reporting on Trump’s Labor Secretary pick and the NLRB rules that Starbucks’ dress code violates labor law.
Otto reported last week that President-elect Trump would be nominating Representative Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-OR), one of the few Republican sponsors of the PRO Act. Her nomination was perceived by some to be a potentially pro-labor move from Trump, who has run repeatedly on populist messaging but delivered a solidly pro-business agenda during his first term.
However, reporting from Josh Eidelson suggests that first appearance may be deceiving. After a number of business groups expressed alarm with the pick of Representative Chavez-DeRemer, members of the transition team reportedly assured them that they would “find Chavez-DeRemer more palatable once the president-elect’s picks for deputy labor secretary and other posts are revealed.” Former Bush-era DoL official Paul DeCamp further pushed the idea that Chavez-DeRemer would serve merely as a symbolic gesture to appease Trump-friendly union leaders like Sean O’Brien, questioning the level of autonomy Secretary Chavez-DeRemer would have. “I really don’t know who is going to be calling the shots,” DeCamp told Eidelson.
Last week, the NLRB ruled against Starbucks’ dress code policy at its New York City Roastery Reserve cafe, finding it violates labor law. The Board panel unanimously determined that the policy—which bans most personal, political, or religious pins and limits workers to the display of just one labor-related pin—is unlawfully broad and limits workers’ rights to organize. The dress code also barred workers from wearing shirts with graphics, including union insignia. In 2022, Starbucks Workers United filed the initial complaint, alleging that managers threatened employees with disciplinary action for wearing union-related apparel.
The Board ordered Starbucks to rescind or revise its dress code and cease other labor law violations.