Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Education
Related: About this forumTesting Revolt In Washington State Brings Feds Into Uncharted Waters
http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/07/16/420837531/testing-revolt-in-washington-state-brings-feds-into-uncharted-watersSeattle 11th-grader Elijah Falk added it all up and decided: It made no sense to take the tests.
The Common Core-aligned Smarter Balanced exams, Elijah was told, were grueling but Washington state didn't require this year's juniors to pass them to graduate from high school. In fact, the only thing compelling Elijah to take the tests this past spring was No Child Left Behind, the federal law. And, by federal standards, Elijah's school was all but certain to be labeled "failing" whether he passed the tests or not.
"If there's something you might risk failing but, regardless, you'll learn something or you'll be stronger because of it ... that's great," Elijah said in April as he organized a boycott of the tests at his school. "But if there's not a real benefit to passing or failing, then it's not worth it."
When testing day finally arrived in high schools across Washington, Elijah was one of more than 42,000 11th-graders roughly half of the state's junior class who did not show up for their exams. At least 22,000 of them formally refused to test. Many of the rest were AWOL.
The Common Core-aligned Smarter Balanced exams, Elijah was told, were grueling but Washington state didn't require this year's juniors to pass them to graduate from high school. In fact, the only thing compelling Elijah to take the tests this past spring was No Child Left Behind, the federal law. And, by federal standards, Elijah's school was all but certain to be labeled "failing" whether he passed the tests or not.
"If there's something you might risk failing but, regardless, you'll learn something or you'll be stronger because of it ... that's great," Elijah said in April as he organized a boycott of the tests at his school. "But if there's not a real benefit to passing or failing, then it's not worth it."
When testing day finally arrived in high schools across Washington, Elijah was one of more than 42,000 11th-graders roughly half of the state's junior class who did not show up for their exams. At least 22,000 of them formally refused to test. Many of the rest were AWOL.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Testing Revolt In Washington State Brings Feds Into Uncharted Waters (Original Post)
Recursion
Jul 2015
OP
eridani
(51,907 posts)1. The state Democratic Party passed a resoultion againt Common Core
The presenter made the excellent case that it was so widely hated that it would not do to just give the issue to Republicans.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)2. What does common core have to do with testing? (nt)
Hestia
(3,818 posts)3. Everything - kids have to pass tests K-12, proving they are "learning" no pass, the teacher
then has to justify their existence and teach towards the test instead of educating the kids. The whole Common Core is for the Testing Industry and not about education.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)5. But, I mean, there are no tests that come with Common Core
That's what's so asinine to me: we're pushing a common curriculum, and a common testing framework, and the two aren't related to each other.
roody
(10,849 posts)4. Common snore, bore, oops core
put an end to paper and pencil tests. All is done on line now. Congrats to Bill Gates.