Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumA Tale of Two Wildfires, Mercury Releases in an Alaska Peat Fire, Radionuclides in a Chernobyl Exclusion Zone Fire.
Last edited Mon Nov 25, 2024, 06:38 AM - Edit history (1)
The papers I'll discuss in this post each discuss a major wildfire, one in Alaska, the other in the famous Chernobyl Exclusion Zone in Ukraine.
They are these:
Effects of Large-Scale Wildfires on the Redistribution of Radionuclides in the Chornobyl River System Yasunori Igarashi, Valentyn Protsak, Gennady Laptev, Igor Maloshtan, Dmitry Samoilov, Serhii Kirieiev, Yuichi Onda, and Alexei Konoplev Environmental Science & Technology 2024 58 (46), 20630-20641
...and...
Substantial Mercury Releases and Local Deposition from Permafrost Peatland Wildfires in Southwestern Alaska Scott Zolkos, Benjamin M. Geyman, Stefano Potter, Michael Moubarak, Brendan M. Rogers, Natalie Baillargeon, Sharmila Dey, Sarah M. Ludwig, Sierra Melton, Edauri Navarro-Pérez, Ann McElvein, Prentiss H. Balcom, Susan M. Natali, Seeta Sistla, and Elsie M. Sunderland Environmental Science & Technology 2024 58 (46), 20654-20664
The first is open to the public to read; the second requires access to a good scientific library, which, happily, I have, at least until the age of fascism begins in the US beginning in January.
Since the planet is on fire generally because, in my view, right wing rhetoric coupled with antinuclear rhetoric (much of which comes from the political left, although I'm on the left and am pronuclear), these two papers are, again in my view, worthy of consideration.
Both are related to energy production; one of the largest source of anthropogenic mercury releases comes from coal combustion where it is released in an aerosol form, ultimately depositing on soils. (I sometimes muse that the reason for the outbreak of political insanity, expressed as fascism, is mercury and lead toxicology, both of which are notable neurological toxins, and both of which are released as aerosols in coal combustion.) Geothermal energy is also a source of mercury pollution, but is a relatively trivial source. (cf. rock A. Edwards, Peter M. Outridge, Feiyue Wang, Mercury from Icelandic geothermal activity: High enrichments in soils, low emissions to the atmosphere, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Volume 378, 2024, Pages 286-299)
The percentages of anthropogenic mercury emissions are shown in this graphic; it dates from 14 years ago, 2010, but as coal use is increasing worldwide, despite much mythology to the contrary connected with faith based belief that so called "renewable energy" is leading to the decline of coal use, it would be safe to assume that coal generated mercury is as bad or worse in 2024 than it was in 2010. (In Germany, so called "renewable energy" is leading to increases in coal use.)
Source: Mercury Policy at MIT blog. (Accessed 11/23/2024.)
The first paper refers, not to mercury, but to radionuclides released in the much and often discussed explosion of the reactor at Chernobyl, the radioactive residuals of which remain in the environment, although in the case of the discussed radionuclides, 137Cs (one of my personal favorite fission products) and 90Sr, (which I also find intriguing) they have significantly decayed since 1986. However these nuclides are not associated with use, but rather with contamination. As of this writing, 14,091 days have passed since the Chernobyl reactor failure on April 26, 1986, which can be attributed to poor reactor design (a positive void coefficient) and poor operational practice (conducting an unauthorized experiment with a major reactor without sufficient analysis), with much coal and gas burned to power to computers to carry on endlessly about the reactor failures. In "percent talk" 58.8% of the 137Cs has decayed to stable 137Ba, and 60.5% of the 90Sr has decayed to stable 90Zr.
It is notable, in my opinion, that radionuclides are released in bulk from nuclear reactors only in failure modes, whereas mercury, lead, carbon dioxide and particulate matter are released by coal plants continuously in normal operations. This should be an important distinction, but somehow isn't.
From the second paper, related to mercury (Hg) emissions from tundra wild fires:
Assessing peatland wildfire Hg emissions, transport, and deposition is essential for improving the understanding of ecosystem Hg uptake. Hg emissions from a wildfire event are typically estimated by measuring atmospheric composition (12,18,20,21) or by assessing changes in soil Hg stores before and after fire. (11) Laboratory and field experiments can also help to constrain Hg emissions and speciation. (19,22,23) Assessing wildfire Hg emissions at the regional or continental scale requires information on burned area and potential Hg release per unit area. These can be derived from observations or information on fuel load, fractional Hg loss (i.e., the proportion of fuel that experiences Hg release), and biome-specific emissions factors (the unit mass of Hg released per unit mass of fuel). (13,24) Studies on peatland wildfire Hg emissions often assume complete release of Hg. (19,20) Such an assumption is consistent with Hg release from soils within the temperature range of oxidation reactions observed in smoldering combustion that typify peat fire (300600 °C). (25) Thus, uncertainties associated with Hg emissions at larger scales are primarily from burned area estimates, (26−29) fuel load (i.e., soil Hg stores), and emissions factors.
Smoke plume height and Hg speciation influence the transport and deposition of wildfire Hg emissions. (12,30) Particles and chemical constituents within the planetary boundary layer (PBL) are more likely to deposit at local to regional scales (10s to 100s km), whereas mixing into the free troposphere (FT) promotes hemispheric to global transport. (31,32) Injection of plumes above the PBL requires convective energy, which depends on fire intensity and environmental conditions that influence fire behavior (e.g., moisture content, topography). (31,33,34) The long residence time of Hg0 in the atmosphere (approx. 612 months) facilitates its long-distance transport, whereas HgII species (including HgII sorbed to particles) deposit within days to weeks. (35) In peatlands, relatively high soil moisture reduces fuel availability and fire thermal energy, resulting in primarily smoldering combustion. (36) Consequently, peatland wildfires often have a relatively high particulate fraction, low convective energy, and smoke plumes that mostly remain within the PBL (e.g., greater than80% in boreal regions), (31,37) with important implications for deposition to local and regional ecosystems. However, limited research on the release and fate of Hg from northern peatland wildfires (11,23) hinders a more complete understanding of Hg cycling at northern high latitudes and ecosystem implications.
The main objective of this study was to empirically estimate Hg emissions from wildfires during summer 2015 in permafrost-affected tundra peatland in the YukonKuskokwim Delta (YKD), Alaska, using measured Hg, SOC, and soil organic layer burn depth and environmental indices derived from satellite remote sensing data...
Graphics from the paper:
The caption:
The caption:
Figure 2. Total mercury (Hg) deposition from background sources (brown) and from the IKU fires (blue) over three domains: Alaska (top), the YukonKuskokwim Delta (YKD; middle), and the Izaviknek and Kingaglia Uplands (IKU; bottom). Fire-attributable deposition is only shown for months where deposition occurred. The shaded blue area represents the range of uncertainty for fire-attributable deposition associated with uncertainties in plume injection altitude, Hg emission speciation, and Hg emission magnitude. The left axis shows areal deposition (μg m2 mo1), and the right axis shows cumulative deposition over each domain (kg mo1). Deposition was simulated using the GEOS-Chem global atmospheric Hg model. (38)
The caption:
The caption:
The authors conclude:
Now let's turn to the big bogeyman at Chernobyl:
From the introductory text of the first paper, which again, is open for the public to read, cited in this post, that about Chernobyl:
...Rivers are crucial pathways for 137Cs and 90Sr redistribution from upstream to downstream regions. Even in the absence of wildfires, 0.0152% of 137Cs (10,11) and 1% of 90Sr12 present in the catchment are transported downstream annually by water and sediment movement. Atmospheric redistribution of 137Cs and 90Sr without wildfires is estimated at 0.00140.035%, (13) but it can significantly increase to approximately 4% due to wildfire disturbance. (14) The 137Cs and 90Sr released into the atmosphere will be widely dispersed not only within Ukraine (8) but also throughout Europe. (15) Further, catchment disturbance by wildfires is expected to affect the redistribution of 137Cs and 90Sr through the rivers. If the radionuclide concentration in rivers exceeds the permissible limit for drinking water in Ukraine (2 Bq/L for 137Cs and 90Sr), (16) it raises a significant environmental and public health concern. However, the impact of wildfires on the redistribution of 137Cs and 90Sr in rivers remains unclear.
Although the fates of 137Cs and 90Sr in charred residues are currently unknown, the dynamics of 137Cs and 90Sr in the environment are similar to those of K and Ca. 137Cs is sorbed onto specific sites in clay minerals through ion exchange, thereby replacing K or NH4. (24,25) However, 90Sr in rivers shows higher mobility than 137Cs. (26) This is because Sr2+ is not sorbed by soils and sediments selectively and is not being fixed. (27) Additionally, wildfires enhanced soil erosion and 137Cs wash-off at plot (28) and catchment (29) scales. Therefore, wildfires in radiologically contaminated areas are thought to affect the concentrations of 137Cs and 90Sr in rivers by supplying sediment, including charred residues, to rivers.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of large-scale wildfires that occurred in Chornobyl in 2020 on the redistribution of radionuclides in the Chornobyl River system, for further understanding of the environmental and public health concern caused by the wildfires, such as the radionuclide concentration in rivers exceeding the permissible limit for drinking water. To achieve this goal, we (1) quantified the concentrations and inventory of 137Cs and 90Sr in charred residues and soil after wildfires, (2) identified the speciation of 137Cs and 90Sr in charred residues and soil affected by wildfires, and (3) analyzed riverine 137Cs and 90Sr concentrations before and after wildfires using long-term observation data. Our findings will provide fundamental information, based on hydrological insights, for assessing of the impact of wildfires on radiation exposure in various populations...
Some discussion of results:
In contrast, wildfires were expected to affect dissolved 90Sr concentrations in the river, with the results indicating a postwildfire increase in 90Sr. Before the wildfires started, four events exceeded the Ukrainian permissible level for 90Sr concentration (2 Bq/L); (16) however, seven such events were observed two years after the wildfire (Figure 4d). Despite a 37% reduction in total 90Sr concentrations due to physical decay between 2001 and 2020, the highest 90Sr concentration (11.0 Bq/L) since 2001 was observed in May 2021 after the wildfire. Human activity in the Sakhan River, within the ChEZ, remains severely restricted. Consequently, the possibility of direct human exposure to levels of 90Sr exceeding 2 Bq/L in drinking water, even after a wildfire, is improbable. Simultaneously, wild animals may directly ingest 90Sr from drinking surface water or river water immediately after wildfires. Aquatic biota, such as freshwater fish, also take up 90Sr following wildfires. In addition, 137Cs and 90Sr in charred residues can be transferred to vegetation. This highlights the importance of continuously investigating the dynamics of long-lived radionuclides at sites after wildfires. Even after the wildfire, the concentrations of dissolved 137Cs and 90Sr in the downstream area of the Pripyat River were several orders of magnitude lower than the Ukrainian permissible levels, and additional human exposure downstream was not expected (SSE Ecocentre, personal communication)...
It is worth noting that the "permissible" level of 90Sr of 2 Bq/L is somewhat lower than the radioactivity associated with 40K (potassium-40) found naturally in seawater, which is generally on the order of 8-12 Bq/L depending on local salinity. 40K has a higher decay energy than 90Sr irrespective of its branching to either 40Ar or 40Ca. (It is thought that the most common isotope of calcium, 40Ca is likely to be radioactive, via double beta decay to ultimately 40Ar. However if it is, the half-life is so long as to escape detection.) However, 90Sr is in secular equilibrium with another radioactive isotope 90Y, and 90Sr, as a congener of calcium, is preferentially deposited in bones. If one were to drink water above the "permissible level" it remains unlikely that one would face health effects, immediately or otherwise, but the overall risk would be slightly higher for say, bone cancer, still vanishingly small, perhaps so small as to not be measurable. That said, better safe than sorry, I guess.
It doesn't appear to be a big health problem, this mobilization after a fire in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.
I'm going to skip reference to the figures in the paper in the interest of time. Again, the paper is open sourced, and if one is inclined to look at the pictures, one is free to do so by use of the link above.
The death toll in Ukraine from the effects of Chernobyl is dwarfed by the death toll associated with the weapons of mass destruction unleased by the Russians. The war in the Ukraine was largely funded by German antinukes, who, after phasing out their nuclear plants, bought huge amounts of dangerous fossil fuels, including but not limited to, coal from Putin's dictatorship.
I trust you are doing your best to enjoy one of the last weekends before the demise of the 250 year old American Democracy in service to an ignorant, criminal, racist, senile fool and his oligarchical ownership.