Health
Related: About this forumPlastics In Contact with Our Food May Be Making Us Gain Weight: Hormone Disrupting Chemicals
- 'Plastics touching our food may be making us gain weight,' The Guardian, April 8, 2023. Ed.
- Hormone-disrupting chemicals are entering our bodies. - We eat 44lbs of plastic in our lifetimes.
When it comes to keeping off extra pounds, watching what we eat may not be enough we have to keep an eye on our foods packaging, too. Rates of obesity among US adults have increased from 14% in 1980 to 42% today, and half the world is expected to be overweight or obese by 2035, with children and teens facing the sharpest increase in obesity and its consequences. Because data doesnt support the idea that overeating and lack of exercise are squarely to blame, the scientific community is exploring other factors that may contribute including metabolic disruption caused by eating products packaged in plastic.
[The Guardian view on obesity: prevention is as important as cure. Read more].
For a study published last year, researchers at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology set out to determine what chemical compounds exist in 34 common plastic items that touch things we eat, such as yogurt cups, juice bottles, styrofoam meat trays, gummy-candy packages, and plastic wrap used for produce and cheese, as well as items often found in kitchens, like polyurethane placemats and sponges. Of the 55,000 chemicals the researchers found in these items, only 629 were identifiable, with 11 being known metabolic disruptors such as phthalates and bisphenols, which interfere with our bodies ability to regulate weight, among other troubling health effects.
However, when exposed to in vitro human cell cultures (studies have not used human or animal test subjects), far more chemicals than the identified 11 metabolic disruptors triggered adipogenesis the process underlying obesity, in which cells proliferate and accumulate an excess of fat. [W]ere quite certain [that] there are many chemicals in plastic products that disrupt metabolism, but we just couldnt identify all of them, Martin Wagner, a study co-author said. Strikingly, Wagner and his colleagues found that a third of all the common products they tested contain chemicals that trigger the adipogenic process.
Although we are exposed to them daily, most of these mystery chemicals are unknown, unstudied and unregulated.
Plastics are made when chemical compounds from refined fossil fuels are mixed with various other, often toxic, chemicals to promote desired characteristics like flexibility and water resistance. We now understand that chemicals dont just stay put in the material but can leach from packaging into our food.. the FDAs approach to regulating chemicals used in food packaging has been described by experts as woefully outdated...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/07/plastic-packaging-obesity-hormone-disruption
niyad
(120,398 posts)appalachiablue
(42,984 posts)druidity33
(6,574 posts)so take it with a grain of salt. It quotes a study from Norway, but also uses, "The scientists I speak to frequently" to support their argument. Also the author's bio basically says they're a journalist with no other info. All indicators... just saying.
Backseat Driver
(4,636 posts)Abstract
Microplastics are particles smaller than five millimeters deriving from the degradation of plastic objects present in the environment. Microplastics can move from the environment to living organisms, including mammals. In this study, six human placentas, collected from consenting women with physiological pregnancies, were analyzed by Raman Microspectroscopy to evaluate the presence of microplastics. In total, 12 microplastic fragments (ranging from 5 to 10 μm in size), with spheric or irregular shape were found in 4 placentas (5 in the fetal side, 4 in the maternal side and 3 in the chorioamniotic membranes); all microplastics particles were characterized in terms of morphology and chemical composition. All of them were pigmented; three were identified as stained polypropylene a thermoplastic polymer, while for the other nine it was possible to identify only the pigments, which were all used for man-made coatings, paints, adhesives, plasters, finger paints, polymers and cosmetics and personal care products.
Keywords: Human placenta; Microplastics; Raman microspectroscopy.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
druidity33
(6,574 posts)Do you know how big a micrometer is? I'm not saying plastics aren't evil. Just saying that this study you point to, and the OP don't actually prove that. They barely prove that plastics are damaging anyhting. What they do prove is that plastics are utterly ubiquitous and impossible to get rid of.
JudyM
(29,536 posts)Warpy
(113,131 posts)I hate smoking, so I'm rather fond of this one: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41366-018-0039-8
As for plastic, I would think the nutritional content of food would decrease far enough to offset any hormonal mimicry.
And why, oh why, do so many pop science writers want to blame any and all pudge on female hormones? Were that the case, all women over 50 would have trouble putting weight on, not keeping it off.