Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(61,298 posts)
Fri May 17, 2024, 03:36 AM May 2024

Opinion: This Alabama AG won't stop at the state line to prosecute abortion

Opinion | This Alabama AG won’t stop at the state line to prosecute abortion

Steve Marshall is Exhibit A in why leaving abortion to the states is a nightmare.

By Ruth Marcus
Associate editor | May 16, 2024 at 4:07 p.m. EDT



Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall with Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) and Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) on Monday in New York. (Stefan Jeremiah/AP)

Not content to prevent women from obtaining abortions in his own state, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall is doing his best to prevent them from traveling to states where the procedure remains legal. Fortunately, a federal judge just ruled that the Constitution won’t let him. Unfortunately, we might have more of this kind of zealotry heading our way.

Marshall’s antiabortion fervor illustrates one of the many shortcomings of the leave-it-to-the-states approach endorsed by, among others, former president Donald Trump. In Alabama, abortion is prohibited, except where there is a serious risk to maternal health. But in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Marshall threatened to prosecute anyone who helped Alabama women obtain abortions elsewhere, asserting that could amount to a “criminal conspiracy” under state law. … “An elective abortion performed in Alabama would be a criminal offense; thus, a conspiracy formed in the State to have that same act performed outside the State is illegal,” Marshall asserted in court papers.

Just because an abortion might be legal elsewhere, Marshall argued, doesn’t prevent prosecution. “Alabama can criminalize Alabama-based conspiracies to commit abortions elsewhere,” he proclaimed. Marshall didn’t threaten to prosecute the women themselves — Alabama’s abortion law doesn’t criminalize women who obtain the procedure, at least not yet, only those who perform it or otherwise help them. But organizations and individuals who provide funding and advice to women seeking abortions out of state filed suit in federal court, asserting that Marshall’s threat of prosecution was unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Myron H. Thompson, a Jimmy Carter appointee, agreed. In a ruling on May 6, he declined Marshall’s bid to have the case dismissed, saying the threat violated the constitutional rights to travel and to freedom of speech. … “The Attorney General’s characterization of the right to travel as merely a right to move physically between the States contravenes history, precedent, and common sense,” Thompson wrote. Marshall’s “constrained conception of the right to travel,” he said, “would erode the privileges of national citizenship and is inconsistent with the Constitution.”

{snip}

Opinion by Ruth Marcus
Ruth Marcus is an associate editor and columnist for The Post. Twitter https://x.com/RuthMarcus
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinion: This Alabama AG won't stop at the state line to prosecute abortion (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves May 2024 OP
And this is why criminalizing abortion is NOT "states' rights". no_hypocrisy May 2024 #1
The GOP believes they own women's bodies. Irish_Dem May 2024 #2
Remember Alabama Senator Katie (women belong in the kitchen) Britt? Lonestarblue May 2024 #3
"Operation Arrest Me, Sucker" fantasy-- thousands of volunteer women, allies drive through Alabama, TX, with Timeflyer May 2024 #4

no_hypocrisy

(49,038 posts)
1. And this is why criminalizing abortion is NOT "states' rights".
Fri May 17, 2024, 03:52 AM
May 2024

If state AGs are going to close their borders to keep pregnant women from escaping to get an abortion somewhere else (IF they can afford to travel, to leave work, to pay for the procedure), then the laws of Alabama (for example) bleed into blue states.

Lonestarblue

(11,928 posts)
3. Remember Alabama Senator Katie (women belong in the kitchen) Britt?
Fri May 17, 2024, 06:12 AM
May 2024

She has introduced a bill to create a federal database of pregnant women, supposedly to provide information but their personal details go in the database, which would be available to unspecified users. Women who register would be directed only to crisis pregnancy centers in their local areas. As we all know, the goal of crisis pregnancy centers is to lie to women and prevent them from having an abortion. They are not medical providers and they give women dangerous misinformation. The site would not direct women to real medical facilities or to organizations like Planned Parenthood that provide actual medical care.

Now imagine who the unspecified users of such data might be. Perhaps Attorneys General of red states that want to prosecute women and anyone who helps them for obtaining an out-of-state abortion? Staffers at crisis pregnancy centers who call and harass pregnant women to keep them from having abortions?

Red states are well on the way to a police state for women of reproductive age. Republicans just haven’t quite figured out to to position it as a safety measure for women.

Timeflyer

(2,688 posts)
4. "Operation Arrest Me, Sucker" fantasy-- thousands of volunteer women, allies drive through Alabama, TX, with
Fri May 17, 2024, 06:49 AM
May 2024

"on my way out of state for an ABORTION--have a nice day!" signs prominently displayed on their vehicles. Wear t-shirts with slogan at airports. Clog the courts with possible cases.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Opinion: This Alabama AG ...