Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 03:50 PM Nov 2012

More discrimination

This time with medical benefits. My daughter just found out that an Upscale Retail Chain incorporated in NYSE, where Marriage Equality is Legal, requires spouses of GAY couples to have to wait a full year to cover them under their medical insurance, BUT spouses of STRAIGHT couples can cover their spouses IMMEDIATELY.

Yes, I know many places, and states, won't cover legally married gay couples at all, but if they DO, it most certainly should be the same coverage for ALL married couples. Maybe they were waiting for Romney, and the Repukes, to ban Marriage Equality in all the states? Sorry. guys. out of luck on that one.

All this MUST be overturned on the FEDERAL level. Just like with Interracial Marriage, there simply cannot be a hodgepodge of different laws across the states. If you are legally married in one state, you must be legally married in ALL states.



3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More discrimination (Original Post) HockeyMom Nov 2012 OP
A friend in Mass found that covering her wife costs $500 more a month than her straight co-worker peacebird Nov 2012 #1
Wow, I believe in NJ you get immediate and the same coverage under lalalu Nov 2012 #2
SHAMEFUL fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #3

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
1. A friend in Mass found that covering her wife costs $500 more a month than her straight co-worker
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 03:52 PM
Nov 2012

covering HIS wife for same policy.

 

lalalu

(1,663 posts)
2. Wow, I believe in NJ you get immediate and the same coverage under
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 04:20 PM
Nov 2012

civil union laws. Yet New Jersey does not recognize gay marriage. This is too confusing and needs to be straightened out on the federal level. The problem is that so many people fall for the states rights nonsense.

fightthegoodfightnow

(7,042 posts)
3. SHAMEFUL
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 04:48 PM
Nov 2012

You are 100% right.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution DEMANDS it.

Keep the faith. You are fighting the good fight now!




Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»LGBT Civil Rights and Activism»More discrimination