Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,736 posts)
Fri Jan 11, 2019, 05:57 PM Jan 2019

Lab revokes honors for controversial DNA scientist Watson

Source: Associated Press

Lab revokes honors for controversial DNA scientist Watson

By MALCOLM RITTER
January 11, 2019

NEW YORK (AP) — James Watson, the Nobel Prize-winning DNA scientist who lost his job in 2007 for expressing racist views, was stripped of several honorary titles Friday by the New York lab he once headed.

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory said it was reacting to Watson’s remarks in a television documentary aired earlier this month.

In the film, Watson said his views about intelligence and race had not changed since 2007, when he told a magazine that he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours — where all the testing says not really.”

In the 2007 interview, Watson said that while he hopes everyone is equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this is not true.”

In this month’s documentary, he said genes cause a difference on average between blacks and whites on IQ tests.

-snip-


Read more: https://apnews.com/5b40e363ddc54d3c96f520fd52345917

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lab revokes honors for controversial DNA scientist Watson (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2019 OP
Bookmarking backtoblue Jun 2019 #1

backtoblue

(11,699 posts)
1. Bookmarking
Sat Jun 1, 2019, 01:25 PM
Jun 2019
“My dad’s statements might make him out to be a bigot and discriminatory,” he said, but that’s not true. “They just represent his rather narrow interpretation of genetic destiny.”


This is a statement from his son.

This article is great for my research into eugenics and modern DNA testing.

"Narrow interpretation"... Sounds like a Barr quote...


Bookmarking and thanks!
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Race & Ethnicity»Lab revokes honors for co...