African American
Related: About this forumAA Group: What is the significance of the language of "private property rights" re: slavery?
Since (black) slaves, after all, were the property of their white masters, in that early era of (Euro) American history in which "private property rights" were being codified and institutionalized.
Anyone else here have any thoughts on this?
MedusaX
(1,129 posts)states which did not allow slavery
were faced with having to allow slave owners, from other states, access to former slaves who had escaped.... because of 'property rights'
Slave owners used 'property rights' to fight against abolition by demanding that the government compensate them for the 'taking' of their property if slavery was abolished.
Slavery was big business.. 'property rights' protected the enforcement of contractual agreements associated with the purchase/sale of slaves.
'Property Rights' also eliminated any legal action /criminal charges for physical abuse or killing of slaves since there was no law against destroying ones own 'property'.
'Property Rights' also prevented the possibility of a federal tax being levied on slave owners for having slaves.... because that would be considered a 'property tax' which was a state power.
Locutusofborg
(542 posts)From the state of Mississippi's "Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union."
In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.
Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin. That we do not overstate the dangers to our institution, a reference to a few facts will sufficiently prove. {Excerpt}
Utter subjugation awaits us in the Union, if we should consent longer to remain in it. It is not a matter of choice, but of necessity. We must either submit to degradation, and to the loss of property worth four billions of money, or we must secede from the Union framed by our fathers, to secure this as well as every other species of property. For far less cause than this, our fathers separated from the Crown of England.